Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SWA 737-800 orders ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2010, 09:58 AM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737
Posts: 5
Default SWA 737-800 orders ?

I have read that both the Pilots and the Flight Attendants have passed agreements to allow SWA to operate the 737-800. I was told that SWA had converted 23 of their -700 options to -800s with deliveries beginning in 2012 but I have not read it anywhere in the media/print.

Any links or truth to this ? Thanks.
walkerpiercejen is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 05:14 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Marvin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B-737 Right
Posts: 243
Default

For what it's worth, this is from "Dallas" magazine, Nov 2010:

The decision to add the larger Boeings became even more appropriate following the AirTran deal. Southwest currently flies 547 Boeing 737-700s, and all but 25 have a 137-seat configuration requiring three flight attendants. The Boeing 737-800 has 175 seats (“with little more cost,” Kelly says) and necessitates a fourth flight attendant. But Kelly says the -800 is a better long-haul aircraft than the 737-700—so long as customer demand fills those additional 38 seats.

“We feel like we have the opportunity within the domestic U.S. route map that we operate to deploy somewhere around 70 737-800s,” Kelly says. “The purpose ... is to operate those flights more effectively and therefore more profitably.”

Besides Mexico and the Caribbean, Southwest also plans to expand to Hawaii, when the economics are right. “The -800 becomes not really an alternative aircraft, it almost becomes mandatory in those markets,” Kelly says. “The 737-700 is just not competitive enough, in my opinion, for those markets.”


D CEO : CEO of the Year (Again!): Gary Kelly of Southwest Airlines
Marvin is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 06:22 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 548
Default

When Kelly says they need the -800 for Hawaii with 175 seats, he better hire some people who know what they are talking about.

It will not do it most of the time form west coast WN cities.

Oak - would usually work.

LAX - will work the majority of time.

LAS - rarely, + will have limitations in the summer domestically.

PHX - almost never
Whale Driver is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 07:15 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Agreed Whale. Despite what you're hearing in the media reports, I predict when/if SWA ever serves HI, it won't be with -800s.
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:31 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 89
Default

Doesn't Alaska use primarily the 800 to go to Hawaii?
cole is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:34 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Alighted's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by cole View Post
Doesn't Alaska use primarily the 800 to go to Hawaii?

Yes...only the 800.
Alighted is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 01:04 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 548
Default

Not with 175 seats.
Whale Driver is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 08:28 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

The -800 will also really help in slot controlled airports on the east coast. Places like LGA and BOS.

I beleive SWA is also getting ETOPS capable -700's.

Very little is known about where they plan to do Hawaii out of. But Alaska does is out of the same common bases:

SEA, OAK, SJC, LAX, SAC, SAN, PDX
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 10:19 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Navy8n's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Whale Driver View Post
When Kelly says they need the -800 for Hawaii with 175 seats, he better hire some people who know what they are talking about.
I can't help but infer by your statement that you believe he hires people who don't know what they are talking bout. Hard for me to take that comment seriously. I'm quite certain Southwest will not announce service to HI unless it is profitable or serves another purpose, such as to compete in one market to improve service in others. With a point and shoot network the company prolly doesn't need to fly it from LAS or PHX to make it worth-while. I'm not a bean counter so I won't pretend to understand the numbers but stating that GK is in need of hiring people who know what they are talking about is pretty funny.
Navy8n is offline  
Old 12-06-2010, 01:52 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly Gal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 737 right
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by Whale Driver View Post
Not with 175 seats.
Other airlines have blocked out seats for operational needs. I am sure it will still have a cost advantage over the -700.
Fly Gal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
edik
Major
1
04-28-2006 02:44 PM
fireman0174
Major
8
04-22-2006 10:01 PM
Linebacker35
Major
122
03-26-2006 10:14 AM
SWAjet
Major
2
07-22-2005 04:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices