Delta LAX base question
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Sadly your not going to get a real idea of when you could hold LAX. Things change rapidly. Marketing makes a switch in equipment and the entire system changes. LAX has traditionally been a junior senior base. Meaning at the top end its senior and the bottom end can be junior because of the cost of living.
Your reserve availability can be measured to any airport your equipment flies into. That means that you don't have to be within 2 hours of LAX if you are within two hours of another airport used such as SNA or ONT.
Your reserve availability can be measured to any airport your equipment flies into. That means that you don't have to be within 2 hours of LAX if you are within two hours of another airport used such as SNA or ONT.
#12
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Thanks again.
Is there any substance to this rumor I've heard about Delta buying Alaska?
FWIW, I saw this article online: A Bon-Bon for Richard: Why Delta Should Buy Alaska ASAP . . . - >> The Cranky Flier
Is it even do-able/sustainable/realistic for Delta at this point?
Thanks!
Is there any substance to this rumor I've heard about Delta buying Alaska?
FWIW, I saw this article online: A Bon-Bon for Richard: Why Delta Should Buy Alaska ASAP . . . - >> The Cranky Flier
Is it even do-able/sustainable/realistic for Delta at this point?
Thanks!
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Just happy to be here Boss!
Thanks again.
Is there any substance to this rumor I've heard about Delta buying Alaska?
FWIW, I saw this article online: A Bon-Bon for Richard: Why Delta Should Buy Alaska ASAP . . . - >> The Cranky Flier
Is it even do-able/sustainable/realistic for Delta at this point?
Thanks!
Is there any substance to this rumor I've heard about Delta buying Alaska?
FWIW, I saw this article online: A Bon-Bon for Richard: Why Delta Should Buy Alaska ASAP . . . - >> The Cranky Flier
Is it even do-able/sustainable/realistic for Delta at this point?
Thanks!
General consensus seems to be it would in fact be a great move for DAL...whether it would be good or bad for the current DAL pilot group is still very much debateable.
Almost all believe it is not in the immediate plans because of the following:
- Focus is on getting slot swap in New York...trying to get DOT/DOJ approval for that and a merger at the same time would be a big challenge.
- Just committed copious amounts of money to the JFK terminal.
- It would be expensive...AK is profitable and growing, and everyone in the industry would do all they could to make it cost DAL plenty.
- The Airline is getting many of the benefits of a merger through the code share (of course pilots only get a minimal indirect benefit of the extra feed allowing for more WB flying out of SEA and LAX..much rather be operating those codeshare flights, and getting the WB flying).
Some say DAL is slowly moving toward a merger:
- Codeshare language which incrementally makes it more and more expensive for AK to terminate the agreement
- syncing of computer systems for reservations and tix
- Moving AK into T-6 at LAX (which I believe DAL has partially funded??)
Other things to consider:
- American buys JB, DAL would probably make a play for AK.
- Any other carrier bids on AK, DAL would get in on that.
- Slot swap at LGA/DCA gets denied (again), DAL might need to consider moving on to building the West Coast to Asia.
Bottom Line: Don't look for anything to happen in the next few years absent a bold move from another carrier. Long term, likely merger but not certain.
Last edited by ITSALLGOOD; 12-13-2010 at 03:55 PM.
#14
Thank you for some good info there, much appreciated.
If I may, an 11/07 hire has how many guys below him on the list? It seems that hiring at DL has been stagnant for most of those last years.
Just trying to get an idea of IF LAX stays the same, size-wise/seniority-wise, and IF DL hires an average of 300/year (?? rumor mill/retirements/wag), what is a realistic timeframe?
Not that I wouldn't be happy anyway, just splittin' hairs...
Thanks!
If I may, an 11/07 hire has how many guys below him on the list? It seems that hiring at DL has been stagnant for most of those last years.
Just trying to get an idea of IF LAX stays the same, size-wise/seniority-wise, and IF DL hires an average of 300/year (?? rumor mill/retirements/wag), what is a realistic timeframe?
Not that I wouldn't be happy anyway, just splittin' hairs...
Thanks!
Denny
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 06:11 PM



