Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   US Airways Captain Escorted From Airport (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/60897-us-airways-captain-escorted-airport.html)

Zapata 07-26-2011 05:49 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 1027688)
30-year A330 CA? At Airways?


Originally Posted by CommutR4Life (Post 1027797)
That's what I was thinking. That can't be right, she has to be an FO


On June 16, captain Valerie Wells, a 30-year-pilot, was scheduled to fly an Airbus A330, which can carry nearly 300 passengers, on a flight from Philadelphia to Rome.


Okay Detectives, She's - been - a - pilot - for - over - 30 - years - AND - she - is - an - A330 - Captain. Capiche?

wrxpilot 07-26-2011 05:56 AM


Originally Posted by Zapata (Post 1028719)
Okay Detectives, She's - been - a - pilot - for - over - 30 - years - AND - she - is - an - A330 - Captain. Capiche?

Uh, I think you missed a bit of sarcasm there! :)

Sliceback 07-26-2011 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1028680)
My opinion is that she had a DUTY to do exactly what she did. The FAR's mandate that any PIC has a DUTY to report and make authorities aware of any issues of safety. Telling the passengers on and off the airplane EXACTLY what happened is the best way to have handled it. It's my experience that passengers can handle most anything if they're told the truth. Even if it's ugly or embarrassing - tell the truth. She did that. She was right every step of the way IMO. USAirways stands no chance in hurting her in any way. Her time off will be at the very least a paid vacation. And possibly, a very nice payout indeed.

Carl

Missed that. What did she say?

XtremeF150 07-26-2011 12:28 PM

In my years as a Captain I found it to be more respected by the passengers to tell them the truth and explain why you need that system fixed. In my short time at DAL I have seen several Captains do just that with an excellent outcome every time.

I also must have missed an FAR's that require an airline pilot to LIE to the passengers that are aboard their flight about any decision the Captain has made for whatever reason.

I do think it is sad that the company feels this decison was made over union disagreements and even went as far as to tell the rest of the employees that the pilots are basically squabbling little brats that are hurting the whole airline. I bet they would feel differently if they were sifting through twisted metal and bodies.

Don't forget those Colgan pilots were Legal to fly too. Legal is not always safe!

GQpilot 07-27-2011 01:18 PM

If I was on the outside looking in, I too would probably commend the captain on what she did. I don't think many of you though know what is going on internally at US. Just as an example: Not long after the seniority list came out I was flying on final to PHX when an east aircraft was cleared to depart in front of us. He proceeded to pull into position and sit. While the tower repeatedly told him cleared to take off, finally yelling at him he replied with, "roger." Tower finally told us to go around. After the flight I went into the chief pilot's office and was told even though there wasn't much they could do, to fill out a report because that was not the first time that the same thing had happened in the last several days. AND these are the people that are on a safety campaign. Yeah, if you believe that I've got some waterfront property to sell ya in Arizona.

Old UCAL CA 07-30-2011 05:50 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1031110)
...You should be fighting this WITH the east pilots. Wake up man!

Carl

Mr Spackler,

Since pilot support is rarely like some types of canine or human love...unconditional or blind, respectively, perhaps Cactus Mike simply isn't able to support a pilot who, by most accounts, acted in a very unprofessional manner, likely contrary to written material in the USAir ops manual? One could throw in a lack of personal maturity and a spoiled child analogy, but no sense in piling on.

My own phone inquiries to PSTAN sources indicate that the incident in question was quite public, loud and in clear conflict with written prohibitions regarding such behavior.

The following is written in the United/Continental ops manual...

"...At no time shall a pilot discuss in the presence of customers or outsiders any matter which would cast doubt on the safety of the operation of a flight...

...Pilots are expected to conduct all matters in the vicinity of the aircraft in a business-like manner...

...Our company’s image and its success depend to a large degree on the conduct of our employees. Employees are expected to act at all times in accordance with the highest moral and ethical standards.


An employee must perform no act which is detrimental to the welfare or reflects unfavorably on the company or its employees. Public statements or displays by employees which are adverse to the business interest of the company are prohibited..."



The above language exists in a similar form in most ops manuals.

Carl Spackler 07-30-2011 01:34 PM


Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA (Post 1031134)
Since pilot support is rarely like some types of canine or human love...unconditional or blind, respectively, perhaps Cactus Mike simply isn't able to support a pilot who, by most accounts, acted in a very unprofessional manner, likely contrary to written material in the USAir ops manual? One could throw in a lack of personal maturity and a spoiled child analogy, but no sense in piling on.

You don't know any of this. None! You should be ashamed of your reaction to a fellow professional airman with only second hand information. I would expect this kind of knee-jerk reaction from management, but from another pilot?! Shameful. Just like Cactusmike, your blind hatred of east pilots is clouding your judgment. You should be fighting with the east pilots to defend this fellow airman!


Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA (Post 1031134)
My own phone inquiries to PSTAN sources indicate that the incident in question was quite public, loud and in clear conflict with written prohibitions regarding such behavior.

You are lying! I've worked many, many PSTAN issues in my time and NONE OF US would EVER talk about the incident to somebody who called on the phone or even asked us in person. NEVER.


Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA (Post 1031134)
The following is written in the United/Continental ops manual...

"...At no time shall a pilot discuss in the presence of customers or outsiders any matter which would cast doubt on the safety of the operation of a flight...

...Pilots are expected to conduct all matters in the vicinity of the aircraft in a business-like manner...

...Our company’s image and its success depend to a large degree on the conduct of our employees. Employees are expected to act at all times in accordance with the highest moral and ethical standards.

An employee must perform no act which is detrimental to the welfare or reflects unfavorably on the company or its employees. Public statements or displays by employees which are adverse to the business interest of the company are prohibited..."



The above language exists in a similar form in most ops manuals.


Again, you haven't a clue as to whether any of this happened. But you seem to be implying that all of us are in violation of our company manuals everytime we give a PA telling passengers of a mechanical difficulty.

You west guys need to put the hatred aside and wake the hell up on this.

Carl

Old UCAL CA 07-30-2011 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1031331)
...You are lying! I've worked many, many PSTAN issues in my time and NONE OF US would EVER talk about the incident to somebody who called on the phone or even asked us in person. NEVER...

Easy sport. I've done a few also. Confidences are never, ever compromised and were not compromised in this particular instance. However, it was public. It didn't happen solely behind a hardened door.

Seek, and ye shall find...especially when it's public.

Ciao :)

Sliceback 07-30-2011 02:50 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1031331)
You don't know any of this. None! You should be ashamed of your reaction to a fellow professional airman with only second hand information..

Carl

You stated that the Captain told the passengers the truth. What were the passengers told?

TonyWilliams 07-30-2011 03:00 PM

Unless we have some first hand accounts of how this captain presented the information, we can jibber jabber all day about it.

Did she yell over the PA, "US Air is dangerous, sending out faulty planes", or calmly mention that the APU was inop, and hopefully this airplane would get fixed, or another airplane would be sent over?

The delivery is just as important as what was said.

I also agree that many views here have as much to do with East/West hatred, as any facts associated with the actual event.

Let's all take a break from this one.

Thread closed.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands