Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   DAL Top End Scope (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/67230-dal-top-end-scope.html)

PinnacleFO 05-10-2012 05:34 PM

The. C series 100 model has 100-124seats and mtow of 132000 I think this would be a delta order not dci: the emb 195 has a weight of 115000 and the crj 1000 is 92000 I think

johnso29 05-10-2012 06:33 PM


Originally Posted by dtfeld (Post 1185581)
Its not just 50 and 76 seaters Delta wants. They are pushing hard to put 86 seaters and up to 11500 lbs MTOW at DCI (read Bombardier C-Series). I think the early and hard push is to get scope relief in exchange for $$$$ and put large RJ's at the bottom feeders.

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...-proposal.html


Bombardier CSeries Gets Deal While Qatar Goes on Hold - Bloomberg

Bombardier list a "major network carrier" as the launch customer for the C-series with a firm order for 10 airframes and a delivery date of 2013

This is pure conjecture on my part but seems to me where this whole mess is going.


How will they fit 86 seats in a 11,500 lbs airplane!?! :eek:

The smallest C-Series weighs MORE then 115,000 LBS. No dice on your speculation. ;)

gloopy 05-10-2012 08:07 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1185898)
That is the way it sounded yesterday. It also sounded retroactive.

As in the entire CHQ air group is fired? Didn't we just sign on some new leases from them though? I'd like to see it.

acl65pilot 05-11-2012 03:00 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1186041)
As in the entire CHQ air group is fired? Didn't we just sign on some new leases from them though? I'd like to see it.

Just repeating what was said. We may see soon enough.

dtfeld 05-11-2012 05:12 AM

You guys are correct that the smallest CSeries will be more than 115500 lbs. so that is not a likely aircraft. My bad.

However, the issue is and remains DAL Scope (and the scope at all majors). You guys give up scope for $$$, the bottom will drop out at the regionals now and the majors will get squeezed from the bottom by the DCI carriers and Emirates et al from the top. It won't be immediate but the end result will not be good for anyone if you want to live and work from a US base.

I hope you guys can hold the line. Otherwise, might as well sign up at Emirates before everyone else realizes we're all screwed. Never want to be at the back of the line!

Bucking Bar 05-11-2012 05:40 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1186087)
Just repeating what was said. We may see soon enough.

Understood, but they say a lot of silly things ... recall this is from the same political body which sold "Comair pilots will get date of hire" to justify allowing Delta to operate three 121 carriers in the Delta network and furlough Delta pilots while hiring street Captains at the Company's own subsidiaries flying the same routes.

Bucking Bar 05-11-2012 05:42 AM

See how the thread "DAL top end scope" returned to the moral center of gravity of the issue?

Our top end scope sucks because our bottom end scope sucks. The problem is a lack of a coherent strategy.

TSioux55 05-11-2012 06:39 AM


Originally Posted by dtfeld (Post 1185581)
Its not just 50 and 76 seaters Delta wants. They are pushing hard to put 86 seaters and up to 11500 lbs MTOW at DCI (read Bombardier C-Series). I think the early and hard push is to get scope relief in exchange for $$$$ and put large RJ's at the bottom feeders.

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...-proposal.html


Bombardier CSeries Gets Deal While Qatar Goes on Hold - Bloomberg

Bombardier list a "major network carrier" as the launch customer for the C-series with a firm order for 10 airframes and a delivery date of 2013

This is pure conjecture on my part but seems to me where this whole mess is going.

It seems that way. A lot of us over here are wondering what is going on with this 86 seat rumor. Except for some of the senior captains, most people want nothing to do with them.

In this awful proposal we got a couple days ago, it said every FO would have a virtual seat lock until upgrade. Soooooo, (God forbid) these 86 seaters come over and they're gonna have junior FO's at $26/hr fly these things? That's what it looks like, if this were to actually happen.

Of course there's the rumor that we'd fly them for American...

But anyway, please don't give in to any more scope. The thought of seeing bigger RJs and spending more and more years at a regional sickens me.

gloopy 05-11-2012 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1186143)
See how the thread "DAL top end scope" returned to the moral center of gravity of the issue?

Our top end scope sucks because our bottom end scope sucks. The problem is a lack of a coherent strategy.

Well you see, its all about the production balance, really. Who cares how big the RJ's are as long as the total number of block hours is less than it is today, right?

Ok, I almost threw up a little in my mouth just typing that in jest. I can't believe we're about to fall for it in real life.

JungleBus 05-11-2012 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1186143)
See how the thread "DAL top end scope" returned to the moral center of gravity of the issue?

Our top end scope sucks because our bottom end scope sucks. The problem is a lack of a coherent strategy.

That's a big part of it, at both the DALPA and national levels. There's also a pretty big contingent at both levels that refuses to even acknowledge a problem exists, that there's anything inherently wrong about the two-tier apartheid system we have, or that there's anything wrong about trading away some members jobs into the outsourcing maw to make other jobs more lucrative.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands