![]() |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1215419)
88 717s. Then subtract 200+ RJs, then add back 70 more. A net reduction of 148 RJs. Passing this TA will do that. Those additional 70 76 seat RJs and 102 70 seaters will undoubtably cover most of those 50 seaters leaving. But 88 717s coming to the fleet would be a good thing, and they could recapture a lot of the old 737-200 and 727 routes that were given away after 9-11 and the BK.
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1215454)
In 3 years, I doubt anyone will think this scope change was worth the money. "we didn't think they would do that".
|
Here's an idea, let the company decide what airplane flies where. We should be flying them. All 70+ seat airplanes.
I know this is not a new idea but the simplicity is good for the company and us as pilots. This TA is similar to the tax code in being entirely too complex; hence inefficient for both parties. |
Originally Posted by contrails
(Post 1215496)
Then older mainline jets will be parked, and you'll be left with a massive fleet of 325 outsourced jets with lots of range and a two-class cabin.
|
Originally Posted by FL370
(Post 1215511)
Here's an idea, let the company decide what airplane flies where. We should be flying them. All 70+ seat airplanes.
I know this is not a new idea but the simplicity is good for the company and us as pilots. This TA is similar to the tax code in being entirely too complex; hence inefficient for both parties. |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1215523)
Plese explain that 70+ seat mainline operation. Will there be only mainline pilots, and DCI FAs and mechanics? How about the ramp? Mainline usually pays a lot more with benefits. That would be cost prohibitive compared to the cheap regional feed we have today. Again, explain how you would do it please.
How again do you justify not outsourcing the 717? Imagine your profit sharing check with that one? |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1215530)
So you're okay with DCI being paid less?
How again do you justify not outsourcing the 717? Imagine your profit sharing check with that one? |
Originally Posted by contrails
(Post 1215496)
Then older mainline jets will be parked, and you'll be left with a massive fleet of 325 outsourced jets with lots of range and a two-class cabin.
|
You know maybe we should have a clause that says if we have pay rates established for an aircraft model then those rates apply to any outsourced airline operating on behalf of Delta Air Lines.
Let's raise the bar... for Bar. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1215530)
How again do you justify not outsourcing the 717? Imagine your profit sharing check with that one?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands