Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   More planes added.... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/68261-more-planes-added.html)

contrails 06-20-2012 07:19 AM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 1215419)
88 717s. Then subtract 200+ RJs, then add back 70 more. A net reduction of 148 RJs. Passing this TA will do that. Those additional 70 76 seat RJs and 102 70 seaters will undoubtably cover most of those 50 seaters leaving. But 88 717s coming to the fleet would be a good thing, and they could recapture a lot of the old 737-200 and 727 routes that were given away after 9-11 and the BK.

Then older mainline jets will be parked, and you'll be left with a massive fleet of 325 outsourced jets with lots of range and a two-class cabin.

Bill Lumberg 06-20-2012 07:44 AM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 1215454)
In 3 years, I doubt anyone will think this scope change was worth the money. "we didn't think they would do that".

You mean parking a lot more RJs than are coming over? You guys seem to forget that something will replace the 200+ RJs that will leave. Many of their routes will stay, but now those 102 70 seaters will take the vacant 50 seater routes, essentially upguaging the route. Then you forget about the 717s. Yes, 21 DC9s will be replaced, but that means an additional 67 717s will takeover plenty of current CR9 and E175 routes that are doing well. Again, that is upguaging. So, we finally get that "mythical" 100 seater to recapture those routes that were lost after our BKs, along with a ratio that favors mainline. Throw in a 19.7% raise for a short 3 year contract, and that's pretty good. Better than a "hunch" of supposed leverage.

FL370 06-20-2012 07:49 AM

Here's an idea, let the company decide what airplane flies where. We should be flying them. All 70+ seat airplanes.

I know this is not a new idea but the simplicity is good for the company and us as pilots. This TA is similar to the tax code in being entirely too complex; hence inefficient for both parties.

Bill Lumberg 06-20-2012 08:00 AM


Originally Posted by contrails (Post 1215496)
Then older mainline jets will be parked, and you'll be left with a massive fleet of 325 outsourced jets with lots of range and a two-class cabin.

And there will never be replacements? We will only downsize and keep 325 large RJs? MD90s are coming, and eventually there could be 737 Max or A320 NEOs orders. Is that a hunch? Just like you saying older mainline will be parked someday, but not knowing when. Eventually there will probably be 3 total legacies and a few LCCs. There will be pressure to keep domestic flying a priority to compete with the other legacies. Obviously we are interested in smaller markets if DL is interested in 717s.

Bill Lumberg 06-20-2012 08:06 AM


Originally Posted by FL370 (Post 1215511)
Here's an idea, let the company decide what airplane flies where. We should be flying them. All 70+ seat airplanes.

I know this is not a new idea but the simplicity is good for the company and us as pilots. This TA is similar to the tax code in being entirely too complex; hence inefficient for both parties.

Plese explain that 70+ seat mainline operation. Will there be only mainline pilots, and DCI FAs and mechanics? How about the ramp? Mainline usually pays a lot more with benefits. That would be cost prohibitive compared to the cheap regional feed we have today. Again, explain how you would do it please.

forgot to bid 06-20-2012 08:17 AM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 1215523)
Plese explain that 70+ seat mainline operation. Will there be only mainline pilots, and DCI FAs and mechanics? How about the ramp? Mainline usually pays a lot more with benefits. That would be cost prohibitive compared to the cheap regional feed we have today. Again, explain how you would do it please.

So you're okay with DCI being paid less?

How again do you justify not outsourcing the 717? Imagine your profit sharing check with that one?

Columbia 06-20-2012 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1215530)
So you're okay with DCI being paid less?

How again do you justify not outsourcing the 717? Imagine your profit sharing check with that one?

Unregard........

Lifeisgood 06-20-2012 09:53 AM


Originally Posted by contrails (Post 1215496)
Then older mainline jets will be parked, and you'll be left with a massive fleet of 325 outsourced jets with lots of range and a two-class cabin.

Exactly. If large RJ's are so needed Delta pilots should fly them.

forgot to bid 06-20-2012 11:16 AM

You know maybe we should have a clause that says if we have pay rates established for an aircraft model then those rates apply to any outsourced airline operating on behalf of Delta Air Lines.

Let's raise the bar... for Bar.

beeker 06-20-2012 11:23 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1215530)
How again do you justify not outsourcing the 717? Imagine your profit sharing check with that one?

Don't get to far ahead. That will happen 3 years from now at the next contract. Something will have to pay for the payraise 3 years from now.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands