O'Malley's rebuttal letter to C20
06-23-2012 | 02:45 PM
#11
Thread Starter
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Tucker's letter was not posted because he specifically forbade public posting. That is not in the Letter from Capt. O'Malley. There have been many letters posted from union officials with no problem. You can't erase the post unless there is objection from the author. It seems to me that you are abusing your position as Moderator to erase content you don't like.
I'll go look at the actual wording of his letter before I allow it on here.
No abuse- trying to be fair.
06-23-2012 | 03:37 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
O'Malley's letter states:
I'm getting further interpretation on whether to allow this. Reading this earlier today is what gave me the impression that it should not be posted on the forums. My current interpretation is if he wants fair play, he will get that by it also not being posted on here.
I'm waiting for the other powers that be to get back to me.
I would have preferred to address them with Captain Tucker in a more private manner, but since his update was widely distributed, it is necessary to give my response the same distribution, if only in the name of fair play.
I'm waiting for the other powers that be to get back to me.
06-23-2012 | 03:47 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
The heading of his letter is to council 20 pilots.
06-23-2012 | 04:09 PM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
O'Malley's letter states:
I'm getting further interpretation on whether to allow this. Reading this earlier today is what gave me the impression that it should not be posted on the forums. My current interpretation is if he wants fair play, he will get that by it also not being posted on here.
I'm waiting for the other powers that be to get back to me.
I'm getting further interpretation on whether to allow this. Reading this earlier today is what gave me the impression that it should not be posted on the forums. My current interpretation is if he wants fair play, he will get that by it also not being posted on here.
I'm waiting for the other powers that be to get back to me.
06-23-2012 | 06:05 PM
#15
Line Holder
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
I was initially bothered by some of the contentions that the end game was rushed and MAYBE dominated by a few individuals. TO's letter was well written and I thought, covered most of the inflamatory allegations. I respect TT and all his work but feel TO's letter answers most of his "issues".
As I have stated elsewhere, it comes down to two things for me. I believe our NC and reps are honest, honorable men who are motivated to deliver the best contract for the Delta pilots. They have been "knee deep" in this TA (and the NC had over 100 face to face negot sessions with mgmt) for the past several months. Add in the lawyers/advisers who have been integral to this process, and you have the vast majority of our "insiders" supporting the TA. This is compelling to me. I believe this TA largely maximizes our leverage and delivers a good contract. I think the risk of turning this down is great while the reward is minimul.
As I have stated elsewhere, it comes down to two things for me. I believe our NC and reps are honest, honorable men who are motivated to deliver the best contract for the Delta pilots. They have been "knee deep" in this TA (and the NC had over 100 face to face negot sessions with mgmt) for the past several months. Add in the lawyers/advisers who have been integral to this process, and you have the vast majority of our "insiders" supporting the TA. This is compelling to me. I believe this TA largely maximizes our leverage and delivers a good contract. I think the risk of turning this down is great while the reward is minimul.
06-23-2012 | 06:34 PM
#16
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Tucker's letter was not posted because he specifically forbade public posting. That is not in the Letter from Capt. O'Malley. There have been many letters posted from union officials with no problem. You can't erase the post unless there is objection from the author. It seems to me that you are abusing your position as Moderator to erase content you don't like.
Can't you just contact both men and ask permission to post both letters and send that to 80?
FWIW, it would be odd to post and comment about TO's letter without TT's first and TT's letter made it clear it wasn't supposed to be posted. So nobody posted it. Good on them.
06-23-2012 | 06:40 PM
#17
Thread Starter
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
I've contacted TT... awaiting his response. 
06-23-2012 | 07:00 PM
#18
The Brown Dot +1
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
06-23-2012 | 07:05 PM
#19
Thread Starter
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
06-23-2012 | 07:17 PM
#20
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
