Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Operating Loss?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2012 | 04:15 AM
  #31  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

We are buying corvettes and saving puppies? If that is the case I found the image for C2012 ...

Old 06-27-2012 | 07:04 AM
  #32  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
You got that right. It'll be Xmas everyday I am flying that thing, at $195 an hour by 2015.....
Hey Bill, can you hold A now on the 88 or 9?
Old 06-27-2012 | 07:29 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Hey Bill, can you hold A now on the 88 or 9?
If he can't, by the time a yes on this TA plays out the joke will be on him, 'cause he ain't gonna be able to hold it on the 717 either.

Santa has a lump of coal for him.

Last edited by texavia; 06-27-2012 at 07:58 AM.
Old 06-27-2012 | 07:34 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Per the PWA, 0 additional 76-seaters are allowed until Delta increases the mainline fleet from where it is right now.

The TA allows them to increase 76-seaters by 70 airframes without increasing the mainline fleet from where it is right now.

That is a win... just not for us.





I'd rather ask for protection from substitute airplanes and airlines.
FTB, IMHO this post should be on every thread in this subforum. I wish hardcopies could be put in the VFiles.

We are starting to see how the company fooled us, and it hasn't even passed yet. Gotta love the information age.
Old 06-27-2012 | 08:21 AM
  #35  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Carl, this TA will create 2900 newhires, bill will make 717A, and every puppy without a home in the US will get a good home. Geez.

80,

I think you are being a little disingenuous here. Alpa is saying without the TA they predict about 1800 new hires (thru 2016) and with the TA they predict 2900 new hires (thru 2016). So I see them predicting about 1100 new hires with the TA. Take a look at the last 2 slides of the Touch and Go. Not saying I agree or disagree with the numbers just that you need to look at the whole document.

Denny
Old 06-27-2012 | 09:45 AM
  #36  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
80,

I think you are being a little disingenuous here. Alpa is saying without the TA they predict about 1800 new hires (thru 2016) and with the TA they predict 2900 new hires (thru 2016). So I see them predicting about 1100 new hires with the TA. Take a look at the last 2 slides of the Touch and Go. Not saying I agree or disagree with the numbers just that you need to look at the whole document.

Denny
I was being sarcastic/facetious, Denny. I was making fun of the sell job on this thing.
Old 06-27-2012 | 10:10 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Maybe someday you will understand that what this TA does is track inflation by selling 2 more viable Compass sized airlines out from under the DAL pilots.

Plus it is concessionary for workrules.

Plus the company was going to do the other things anyway - like buy the airplane you are covetting.
Can't hit a homerun when the other teams can't get out of the dugout. No pattern bargaining with our peers means get the deal done with as many improvements as we can get, keep it short in duration, and get a good raise, which 19.7% in 3 years accomplishes. Going the longer section six way won't give us anything better, and it will take longer. Supposed leverage is a hunch at best, and RA already warned about plan B. Do you think he would come back with a better offer after the other unions were voted off the property? Heck no. It's not that hard to understand.
Old 06-27-2012 | 10:14 AM
  #38  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Can't hit a homerun when the other teams can't get out of the dugout. No pattern bargaining with our peers means get the deal done with as many improvements as we can get, keep it short in duration, and get a good raise, which 19.7% in 3 years accomplishes. Going the longer section six way won't give us anything better, and it will take longer. Supposed leverage is a hunch at best, and RA already warned about plan B. It's not that hard to understand.
With constructive engagement you shouldn't have to fear that a no vote causes immediate vindictive retribution.

Or it's not engagement, it's infringement.
Old 06-27-2012 | 01:44 PM
  #39  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
80,

I think you are being a little disingenuous here. Alpa is saying without the TA they predict about 1800 new hires (thru 2016) and with the TA they predict 2900 new hires (thru 2016). So I see them predicting about 1100 new hires with the TA. Take a look at the last 2 slides of the Touch and Go. Not saying I agree or disagree with the numbers just that you need to look at the whole document.

Denny
Denny,

We had ACTUAL scope language that we thought disallowed a RAH style holding company abuse. We were wrong because the company said they'd found a loophole and our "union" agreed with management. That's with ACTUAL language. Now we have "predictions" from people, not contract language, but "predictions"...and we're giving that credence? Really?

Alfaromeo (a member of our MEC administration) has posted here that "this TA includes an additional 1,000 mainline jobs." That's not only completely incorrect, but it's an example of why some of us are referring to this as a sales job. The 88 717's are NOWHERE in this TA. They are only in a press release from management, and that's just one example. Personal predictions, emails from management, and press releases from management are NOT contract language.

Carl
Old 06-27-2012 | 01:53 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
With constructive engagement you shouldn't have to fear that a no vote causes immediate vindictive retribution.

Or it's not engagement, it's infringement.
Sometimes a good deal comes up early that can help both parties. If you don't want to be a part of that at that time, you may lose out. You may want to re-read RA's message, it doesn't seem vindictive, rather matter of fact. Roll the dice....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Major
82
04-30-2011 06:36 PM
Airfix
Regional
110
01-22-2009 06:45 PM
SkyHigh
Major
3
10-31-2005 08:27 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-19-2005 12:46 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-25-2005 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices