So I guess the last question I have is why cant carriers use Flag operations for flights between places like JFK-LAX?
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 1262833)
So I guess the last question I have is why cant carriers use Flag operations for flights between places like JFK-LAX?
Example: Let's say an extra crewmember costs $100/hr for a transcon. turn. That's roughly $1100 give or take. What does it cost to keep it at a crew of 2 and pay for their hotel room and per diem - maybe $500? Crews lose out on QOL, but it saves companies money in this type of scenario, in my opinion. Plus I believe you'd have type the FO's if you wanted to do any kind of FO/FO crew relief. Not a big deal, but more work (read: more money). |
You can operate a 3 person crew domestically beyond 8 hours if you're Jetblue.
|
Originally Posted by ExpectDirect
(Post 1262931)
My guess is that you probably could augment the crews if you got the Ops Spec for it. It's likely just cheaper for them to build unproductive trips than carry extra crew.
Example: Let's say an extra crewmember costs $100/hr for a transcon. turn. That's roughly $1100 give or take. What does it cost to keep it at a crew of 2 and pay for their hotel room and per diem - maybe $500? Crews lose out on QOL, but it saves companies money in this type of scenario, in my opinion. Plus I believe you'd have type the FO's if you wanted to do any kind of FO/FO crew relief. Not a big deal, but more work (read: more money). FWIW, the regional carrier I used to fly for is giving PIC types to all FOs because the company expects the FAA to require PIC types as part of the new training/experience regulations. |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 1262947)
I definitely agree, but I was thinking as it stands now we need 2 crews (CA/FO + CA/FO) for the trip. If it was augmented it could be a 3-pilot crew CA/FO/FO and avoid hiring another person. Not having to pay the initial training costs, and expense of employee benefits, as well as not having to pay another CA for the trip. Who knows.
It will be interesting to see the differences in trip construction once the new duty/flight time/rest rules go into effect. In the end, the more pilots, the merrier! |
Perhaps because "Flag" means International and JFK-LAX is within the 48 states.
GF |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 1262947)
I definitely agree, but I was thinking as it stands now we need 2 crews (CA/FO + CA/FO) for the trip. If it was augmented it could be a 3-pilot crew CA/FO/FO and avoid hiring another person. Not having to pay the initial training costs, and expense of employee benefits, as well as not having to pay another CA for the trip. Who knows.
FWIW, the regional carrier I used to fly for is giving PIC types to all FOs because the company expects the FAA to require PIC types as part of the new training/experience regulations. Denny |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 1263194)
Perhaps because "Flag" means International and JFK-LAX is within the 48 states.
GF |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1263208)
You have lost me on this one. Say you have a trip that is JFK-LAX-JFK. A three person crew might be able to do both legs in a turn so it takes 3 pilots to fly both legs. The two pilot crew does the trip in two days with 2 pilots. What am I missing?
Denny |
I will take a side bet on those "new FAR rules" from the FAA being delayed instead of implemented in January 2014 due to a myriad of reasons. Airlines crying they can't hire enough pilots, or it will cost them too much, or the general vacuum left at the regionals as pilots get hired up to majors and the FAA cites safety reasons.
Trying not to be a Negative Nancy, just stating the obvious. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands