Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Augmented Crew operations (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/70106-augmented-crew-operations.html)

Flyby1206 09-18-2012 06:45 AM

So I guess the last question I have is why cant carriers use Flag operations for flights between places like JFK-LAX?

ExpectDirect 09-18-2012 09:44 AM


Originally Posted by Flyby1206 (Post 1262833)
So I guess the last question I have is why cant carriers use Flag operations for flights between places like JFK-LAX?

My guess is that you probably could augment the crews if you got the Ops Spec for it. It's likely just cheaper for them to build unproductive trips than carry extra crew.

Example: Let's say an extra crewmember costs $100/hr for a transcon. turn. That's roughly $1100 give or take. What does it cost to keep it at a crew of 2 and pay for their hotel room and per diem - maybe $500?

Crews lose out on QOL, but it saves companies money in this type of scenario, in my opinion. Plus I believe you'd have type the FO's if you wanted to do any kind of FO/FO crew relief. Not a big deal, but more work (read: more money).

lolwut 09-18-2012 10:11 AM

You can operate a 3 person crew domestically beyond 8 hours if you're Jetblue.

Flyby1206 09-18-2012 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by ExpectDirect (Post 1262931)
My guess is that you probably could augment the crews if you got the Ops Spec for it. It's likely just cheaper for them to build unproductive trips than carry extra crew.

Example: Let's say an extra crewmember costs $100/hr for a transcon. turn. That's roughly $1100 give or take. What does it cost to keep it at a crew of 2 and pay for their hotel room and per diem - maybe $500?

Crews lose out on QOL, but it saves companies money in this type of scenario, in my opinion. Plus I believe you'd have type the FO's if you wanted to do any kind of FO/FO crew relief. Not a big deal, but more work (read: more money).

I definitely agree, but I was thinking as it stands now we need 2 crews (CA/FO + CA/FO) for the trip. If it was augmented it could be a 3-pilot crew CA/FO/FO and avoid hiring another person. Not having to pay the initial training costs, and expense of employee benefits, as well as not having to pay another CA for the trip. Who knows.

FWIW, the regional carrier I used to fly for is giving PIC types to all FOs because the company expects the FAA to require PIC types as part of the new training/experience regulations.

ExpectDirect 09-18-2012 12:10 PM


Originally Posted by Flyby1206 (Post 1262947)
I definitely agree, but I was thinking as it stands now we need 2 crews (CA/FO + CA/FO) for the trip. If it was augmented it could be a 3-pilot crew CA/FO/FO and avoid hiring another person. Not having to pay the initial training costs, and expense of employee benefits, as well as not having to pay another CA for the trip. Who knows.

Good point.

It will be interesting to see the differences in trip construction once the new duty/flight time/rest rules go into effect. In the end, the more pilots, the merrier!

galaxy flyer 09-18-2012 07:14 PM

Perhaps because "Flag" means International and JFK-LAX is within the 48 states.

GF

Denny Crane 09-18-2012 07:54 PM


Originally Posted by Flyby1206 (Post 1262947)
I definitely agree, but I was thinking as it stands now we need 2 crews (CA/FO + CA/FO) for the trip. If it was augmented it could be a 3-pilot crew CA/FO/FO and avoid hiring another person. Not having to pay the initial training costs, and expense of employee benefits, as well as not having to pay another CA for the trip. Who knows.

FWIW, the regional carrier I used to fly for is giving PIC types to all FOs because the company expects the FAA to require PIC types as part of the new training/experience regulations.

You have lost me on this one. Say you have a trip that is JFK-LAX-JFK. A three person crew might be able to do both legs in a turn so it takes 3 pilots to fly both legs. The two pilot crew does the trip in two days with 2 pilots. What am I missing?

Denny

Flyby1206 09-19-2012 05:12 AM


Originally Posted by galaxy flyer (Post 1263194)
Perhaps because "Flag" means International and JFK-LAX is within the 48 states.

GF

Well we fly "Domestic" rules to several destinations that sure as hell arent in the 48 states. I didnt know if Flag rules could be applied to routes that are within the US.

Flyby1206 09-19-2012 05:14 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1263208)
You have lost me on this one. Say you have a trip that is JFK-LAX-JFK. A three person crew might be able to do both legs in a turn so it takes 3 pilots to fly both legs. The two pilot crew does the trip in two days with 2 pilots. What am I missing?

Denny

Right, but each day the aircraft is going JFK-LAX-JFK. The same 3 man crew could operate that turn on both days, doing the work it would normally take 4 pilots.

Free Flyer 09-19-2012 05:56 AM

I will take a side bet on those "new FAR rules" from the FAA being delayed instead of implemented in January 2014 due to a myriad of reasons. Airlines crying they can't hire enough pilots, or it will cost them too much, or the general vacuum left at the regionals as pilots get hired up to majors and the FAA cites safety reasons.

Trying not to be a Negative Nancy, just stating the obvious.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands