Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
"To upgrade or not, that is the question" >

"To upgrade or not, that is the question"

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

"To upgrade or not, that is the question"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2013, 03:21 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
T6 Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 256
Default "To upgrade or not, that is the question"

Good day -- career military guy here trying to understand the system.

I recently came across this post someone offered up:

The 777 FO's at DFW are dominated by guys who could be flying CA 10 or 15 years ago.

This strikes me as odd. I'm trying to wrap my hands around the fact of the career FO mindset. The mentality that I've grown accustomed to in the military is to seek upgrade in your airframe (wingman, 2 ship FL, AC, IP, etc) at the earliest possible moment assuming your skillset/timing allowed.

My question is to those who 'aspire' to remain in the FO position -- why *not* seek upgrade. I can see the 777 FO payscale at 12 yrs just as well as the next person (145 vs 231 CA @ AA for example)...am I missing something here? Why not seek the CA position and higher pay scales/more responsibility...?
T6 Pilot is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:23 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by T6 Pilot View Post
Good day -- career military guy here trying to understand the system.

I recently came across this post someone offered up:

The 777 FO's at DFW are dominated by guys who could be flying CA 10 or 15 years ago.

This strikes me as odd. I'm trying to wrap my hands around the fact of the career FO mindset. The mentality that I've grown accustomed to in the military is to seek upgrade in your airframe (wingman, 2 ship FL, AC, IP, etc) at the earliest possible moment assuming your skillset/timing allowed.

My question is to those who 'aspire' to remain in the FO position -- why *not* seek upgrade. I can see the 777 FO payscale at 12 yrs just as well as the next person (145 vs 231 CA @ AA for example)...am I missing something here? Why not seek the CA position and higher pay scales/more responsibility...?
QOL.....most likely. Being able to be based where you live, having a good amount of seniority to be able to bid whatever you want from trips to vacations to holidays off. Just my guess.
WARich is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:26 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
T6 Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 256
Default

I guess I don't understand how the seniority system works in the airline with regards to bidding, airframe, QOL, etc....

Time to start reading more.
T6 Pilot is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:35 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by T6 Pilot View Post
I guess I don't understand how the seniority system works in the airline with regards to bidding, airframe, QOL, etc....

Time to start reading more.
Your seniority number is everything in the airline world. Looks like your a T-6 dude. Easiest thing, walk down to the reserve office and talk to any of the TR airline guys, they'll be able to explain it better in person.
WARich is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:39 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 777 Cap
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by T6 Pilot View Post
I guess I don't understand how the seniority system works in the airline with regards to bidding, airframe, QOL, etc....

Time to start reading more.
If you are junior, you will have a poor quality of life.

Reserve means you are on call.
Waiting for the crew desk to call and assign you a trip.
They can call in the middle of the night and take away your days off.
You work all holidays, birthdays, anniversaries, etc.
Difficult to commute to reserve, so burn precious days off.
It sucks.

If you are senior you get the time off you want, you never have to talk to anyone, and you are buying the quality of life by taking less pay.

Worth it imho.

I sat reserve 25 years ago, and was abused so bad that i downbid and have been senior ever since.

Working 28 days in a row, all international, 136 hrs credit, yet paid 70. Yes it was legal, and yes it sucked.

senior flap
flap is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:47 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

It's a quality of life thing like War said.

To keep it simple, imagine an airline has only 777s. The most senior first officer has his pick of trips. Let's say for this particular airline that's things like Rome, or Paris or maybe something that's worth alot of pay time vs how many days you work. He also gets all the holidays and weekends off - all of them. Matter of fact, he(she) can get any day off that they need because he's choosing his schedule first. (graduations, weddings, birthdays etc.) He also can be first in line for premium paying trips (those that pay 150%, 200% of regular pay etc.) The specifics vary from airline to airline, but often very senior FO's can make up the pay differential to CA in premium paying trips.

Now the guy 1 number senior to him, the most junior captain, is sitting reserve with little to no control over his schedule. He's on call every holiday and many if not all weekends. He also is making reserve guarantee every month and that's it.

One example I can think of here at DAL: The desirability of trips on any fleet of a/c varies from good to bad, but the difference is usually gradual. You know, this trip is a little worse than this one, which is a little worse than this one, and so on. Except often there are a handful of VERY good trips that the most senior will bid for. The 737 in ATL has some trips they call "dinner and a movie" trips. You fly to some Caribbean/Latin American city, pretty long leg: say 4.5 hours. You're not legal to fly back, so they have deadheaded another crew with you, who flies it back while you deadhead. At the end of the day, you've done a 9:15 day trip and for half of that, you were sitting in business class eating the meal and watching movies.....or sleeping. You bid nothing but those and you end up with a full pay month (half of which was riding in business), you were in your own bed every night and you worked 8 days (off 22) to get it. As a result (and if I remember correctly) you've got 737 FO's who could hold widebody captain if they wanted. If I'm wrong on that, suffice it to say they are very senior for their seat.

This is an obviously simplified explanation, but I think you can get the gist.

Last edited by Jay5150; 11-15-2013 at 04:08 AM.
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 04:31 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

The other thing is (and I'm guessing here but) they won't have gone to the left seat in the 777. They would have gone from the top of the list as a 777 FO (see all the above about seniority) to the bottom of the list on a MD or 737. So you're not looking at as much of a pay jump. And they would go from international to multi-leg trips out of LGA.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 04:52 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
The other thing is (and I'm guessing here but) they won't have gone to the left seat in the 777. They would have gone from the top of the list as a 777 FO (see all the above about seniority) to the bottom of the list on a MD or 737. So you're not looking at as much of a pay jump. And they would go from international to multi-leg trips out of LGA.
This is a huge reason. Long haul Asia (or maybe even Europe from the West Coast) flying on a wide body means schedules with 18-20 days off a month that are commutable on one or both ends of the trip, meaning one or two nights more at home each trip. The pay differential for the "Big Three" is only 10-15% between wide body FO and narrow body captain and a line holding WB FO can easily make more than a reserve NB captain. Throw in the ease of wide body trips compared to pushing a 737 around the system and it's obvious why the choice to upgrade is far from cut and dried. I live in base and retired from the reserves, so I upgraded to reserve NB Captain from line holding WB FO as soon as I could (at the time the pay differential at CAL between WB FO and 737 CA was over 20%), but if I was a commuter, there's no way I would have done so. I tell people my take home pay went up when I upgraded, but my hourly rate in terms of time away from base actually went down. If you're commuting, don't need the extra money, or have a job on the side, WB FO is often a better deal than NB captain.
XHooker is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 05:56 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
T6 Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 256
Default

Jay5150, and others...

Perfectly clear now....different mentality but in the end I know that QOL is what counts.

Thanks!
T6 Pilot is offline  
Old 11-15-2013, 05:58 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: A320 right
Posts: 87
Default

Just had a 24 yr 777 UAL FO on my jumpseat. He said his QOL rocks and the upgrade is always there for the taking when he wants it.

Not a bad place to be.


T
Trent900 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Corporate
1
01-20-2013 06:09 AM
EZBW
Foreign
31
02-18-2012 03:29 AM
Duksrule
Regional
8
06-30-2011 04:40 PM
molson247
Regional
2
03-26-2007 04:15 AM
ERJ135
Regional
4
10-31-2005 07:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices