Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Northwest-Delta Antitrust Exemption Rejected by U.S. >

Northwest-Delta Antitrust Exemption Rejected by U.S.

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Northwest-Delta Antitrust Exemption Rejected by U.S.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2006, 12:10 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NGINEWHOISWHAT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 423
Default Northwest-Delta Antitrust Exemption Rejected by U.S.

Someone with a big brain let me know if this article was even worth posting and what your take is. Thanks in advance. Merry Christmas,

Tom



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aChxZxQssMN8

By John Hughes

Dec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Transportation Department rejected an antitrust exemption to let bankrupt carriers Northwest Airlines Corp. and Delta Air Lines Inc. collaborate on international flights, citing a lack of benefit to the public.

Northwest sought the waiver over the objection of its biggest U.S. rivals to work with Delta, Air France-KLM and Alitalia SpA in SkyTeam, the world's second-largest airline alliance. The request was the first time two major U.S. carriers sought antitrust immunity to collaborate.

The department instead proposed letting the six SkyTeam carriers sell tickets for one another's flights, a practice known as code sharing. Northwest, the No. 4 U.S. airline, plans to ask the department to reverse the decision, which the carrier today said hinders its efforts to exit bankruptcy.

The exemption would have let Eagan, Minnesota-based Northwest boost the $1 billion in annual revenue it takes in through an existing agreement with KLM. Northwest would have joined the other carriers in funneling passengers to each other's networks and operating more like a single entity by cooperating on route planning, marketing and setting prices.

``Antitrust immunity is tantamount to a merger in competitive terms,'' said Michael Roach of San Francisco-based Roach & Sbarra Consulting. ``It's not surprising to me those guys were unable to convince the government. The government is going to continue to be very cautious. The goal always is competition.''
NGINEWHOISWHAT is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 07:40 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RightSeatDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 161
Default

My only question is the standard they appeared to have set, "lack of benefit to the consumer". This may be splitting hairs, but shouldn't the standard be that the consumer isn't harmed?
RightSeatDude is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 09:43 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Check the link - story dated 12/22/2005.

Yawn....
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 10:19 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NGINEWHOISWHAT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire View Post
Check the link - story dated 12/22/2005.

Yawn....
I'm aware that it's old now, but I'm asking if the DOT suggested a code share vs. actually selling seats, and the wording about
the merger, how does that play on the merger now?
NGINEWHOISWHAT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM
RockBottom
Major
10
03-28-2006 11:46 AM
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM
1900Driver
Major
5
09-18-2005 10:00 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices