![]() |
Originally Posted by jimf15e
(Post 1862204)
Sorry to offend, I thought I made it clear I had no such assumptions when I stated "if I'm lucky enough to be given [an offer]." I feel this thread is causing more trouble than I would have liked. I'll ask the mods to delete. Thanks for the data though :).
|
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 1862223)
Maybe you better rethink that.
The military "guys" sacrificed their comfortable way of life so that you can sit here and enjoy all the freedoms they have fought for. They deserve, more than A-N-Y-O-N-E, to have multiple offers from the top companies. If I were a recruiter, I would offer employment to all these heros FIRST! I am glad they come on here expecting multiple offers. They deserve it.:) TEN |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 1862621)
As far as military guys giving away acomfortable way of life- maybe all the military guys I know and have flown with have downplayed their sacrifice but most of them painted life in the military as pretty cush except for the time away from family on deployments (I agree, that is a huge sacrifice), but otherwise they never really had much to worry about. Then they come out with a lifetime pension, healthcare, and multiple employment offers. Pretty good for 20 years. "never had much to worry about" you, sir, are a horse's ass. |
I knew my comments might ruffle a few feathers but I'll stand by them. I'm sure my choice of words could have been better but it is what it is.
I respect those that choose to serve in our volunteer military. Do I think it's fair to be given special treatment for a second career when also having a life pension and full medical after only 20years? No, but life's not fair. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 1862846)
...also having a life pension and full medical after only 20years? No, but life's not fair.
Don't like it? Talk to your congressmen/representatives and convince them to drive a change. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 1862846)
Do I think it's fair to be given special treatment for a second career when also having a life pension and full medical after only 20years? No, but life's not fair. Good luck with your inferiority complex. |
Nothing will ever beat the "golden children" that joined the ANG out of high school, went to local college for two years, went to cadets, back flying heavies or fighters for a time... bingo, airlines at 23-24.
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 1862182)
I love the mil guys that come on here and just assume they will have multiple offers to choose from. Meanwhile you have tens of thousands of current airline guys with thousands of hours of 121 experience just hoping to get a call by one legacy carrier.
Arrogance much? You'll fit right in a delta. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 1862846)
I knew my comments might ruffle a few feathers but I'll stand by them. I'm sure my choice of words could have been better but it is what it is.
I respect those that choose to serve in our volunteer military. Do I think it's fair to be given special treatment for a second career when also having a life pension and full medical after only 20years? No, but life's not fair. You do realize that that is the carrot that keeps just some into 20 at all right. In your world, everyone would do what, just the minimum and get out after enlistment? If so, how you compensate for those that spend their youth defending the country? If there is no pension, no 401K matching, no medical, are they just supposed to do the duty and move along? All I can tell you is that if that is the deal you propose it will actually cost ALOT $$$ more to get people to reenlist/commit to risk their life for the defense of the country. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 1862846)
Do I think it's fair to be given special treatment for a second career when also having a life pension and full medical after only 20years? No, but life's not fair.
By the time an active duty military pilot can resign, he (or she) already has 10+ years of service. I say military pilot, but that is secondary to our main role. The main role is military officer. That job entails several leadership positions. After 10 years, that is quite a bit of experience leading, something that any corporation might desire. If a service member does 20+ years, well, that is more leadership experience with greater responsibilities. Every so often, we get to go fly a plane. That flight could be obtaining a new qualification, upgrading one of our peers, teaching a student military aviator, combat support, combat, etc. Before any of that happened, we had to become a military pilot. That is a long and tough path, where a decent amount attrite early on. It is no hidden secret what that training entails. My guess is that many airlines are aware of the above. Leadership traits in the air and on the ground. Not only that, but successfully completed military flight training (~18-24 months). It is not a civilian pilot verse military debate. We are all pilots, and the airlines hire future Captains. Since we all meet the minimums, then how does an employer rack and stack? Go for the pilot with the most hours or the most well-rounded pilot? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:20 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands