Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Former FA wife sues SWA over dead husband... >

Former FA wife sues SWA over dead husband...


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Former FA wife sues SWA over dead husband...

Old 04-22-2015 | 10:27 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Flies for Fun
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: CE-172 Heavy
Default Former FA wife sues SWA over dead husband...

Flight attendant files wrongful death suit against Southwest Airlines | Road Warrior Voices

Richard Ilczyszyn, a financial analyst and contributor to CNBC’s “Futures Now”, was on a Southwest flight last September when he fell ill, suffering what was later determined to be a fatal pulmonary embolism. He collapsed in the plane’s bathroom about 10 minutes before the flight was scheduled to land at John Wayne Airport in Orange County, California, and according to the Sheriff’s report, the flight crew discovered him “slumped over,” “groaning” and “crying.”

When the flight landed, a crew member called the police, allegedly believing that Ilczyszyn was a disruptive passenger. In a phone call, a Southwest employee told the dispatcher:
Apparently there’s a passenger in – locked himself in the lav and is screaming and yelling
All of the passengers were instructed to leave the plane before the officers boarded the aircraft, discovering an “unresponsive” Ilczyszyn in the bathroom. The paramedics were then called to the scene.

That delayed response to Ilczyszyn’s condition – and the fact that Southwest crew members called the Sheriff instead of an ambulance – is why his widow, Kelly Ilczyszyn has filed a wrongful death suit against the airline. Ilczyszyn, who has worked as a Southwest flight attendant for 16 years, believes that her husband would have survived if he had received immediate medical attention. She told CBS News:
One flight attendant said she opened the door and she saw the top of my husband’s head and his head was down and he was just whimpering, and [she] left him there […] Somebody that’s head is down and there’s no communication is somebody that’s in distress, that needs help. That doesn’t need a police officer. They need paramedics.
In a statement, representatives for Southwest said that the crew acted “appropriately and professionally” when handling the “unfortunate medical event.”

Sara Nelson, the International President of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO, told CBS that flight crews are trained to treat any kind of disruption during a flight as a potential threat to security – or as a diversion to distract crews while a more dangerous incident takes place. She said:
It’s possible that they could not determine that there was not a serious security risk to the flight.
Kelly Ilczyszyn believes otherwise. “They dropped the ball,” she told the Los Angeles Times.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 01:42 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Default

He had a PE. There was nothing the crew could have done to save his life. I've seen people IN THE ER, have a PE, and not make it.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 01:55 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 1
Default

Ilczyszyn, who has worked as a Southwest flight attendant for 16 years,



Does she still work there?
So she collected on his life insurance and now wants more from her employer?
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 03:08 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Airbus F/O
Default

I think she has merit specially when the F/A stated that she opened the Lav and saw the man with his head down. We weren't there to see what took place, but the fact that they waited to get to him will be enough to get some type of settlement from the airline, never mind whether or not he would have made it.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 03:20 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

This doesn't make it sound very good for SWA: Financial analyst Richard Ilczyszyn's widow files wrongful death lawsuit against Southwest Airlines - CBS News
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 03:20 PM
  #6  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

You can't disregard a pax in distress because he "might" be part of a diversion.

But as deadstick pointed out he wasnt going to make it anyway.

Last edited by rickair7777; 04-22-2015 at 03:55 PM.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 03:34 PM
  #7  
TonyC's Avatar
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

It's not the FA's job to decide whether the passenger will make it or not. Other passengers should have been kept in their seats while the passenger in distress received medical assistance as quickly as possible. Deboarding the airplane and then calling the Sherrif for an unruly passenger was inexcusable.


The widow is not a former FA; she is an FA on leave. She might have some idea of what the proper procedures are.





.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 03:37 PM
  #8  
Beaver Hunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Default

Non of you know if those minutes would have made a difference or not. However the FA's on this were dead wrong (no pun intended).
The world keeps filling itself with more and more sheep.
Use your dam brains folks.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 03:52 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

This is where our national paranoia has taken us.

Pathetic.
Reply
Old 04-22-2015 | 05:09 PM
  #10  
Max Relax Roll's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
30
07-22-2007 08:36 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
10
06-29-2006 06:08 AM
corl737
Major
7
01-22-2006 10:05 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM
KiloAlpha
Major
16
11-23-2005 01:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices