Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
All this talk of pilot shortage... >

All this talk of pilot shortage...

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

All this talk of pilot shortage...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2018, 05:06 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 745
Default All this talk of pilot shortage...

I keep hearing that the military is short on pilots. If that is true why wouldn’t they consider creating a program for older and experienced airline pilots? Surely you can teach a 40 year old airline guy to fly a tanker or transport. Coupled with some sort of officers program tailored to people who won’t/can’t go full time do you think it’s viable?
Joachim is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 07:54 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

No.

40 y/o going through UPT. Yikes
Sputnik is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 08:53 AM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

The military is not short of entry level pilots, plenty of applicants.

The military system builds experience FAST... a pilot who completes his initial ten-year obligation is vastly more experienced and capable than a noob. A 20-year vet even more so. The issue isn't replacing the ones who leave faster, it's retaining MORE of the experienced pilots for flying and non-flying leadership jobs, as well as non-flying staff jobs.

They don't need 40 year-old O1's. A a 40 year old will most likely be too old and worn out for senior leadership roles at age 60, especially involving tactical flying. There are so people who can do military tactical ops over age 50, but the majority can't.

As Sputnik said, older people don't learn as fast and military training tends to push you to your max.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 09:31 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 745
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
No.

40 y/o going through UPT. Yikes
That was my point, to come up with a system that draws on the experience pool in the airlines. Do you really need to send an Allegiant capt. through upt or could you simply do a 6mo transition course and put him in the reserves?
Joachim is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 09:36 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
That was my point, to come up with a system that draws on the experience pool in the airlines. Do you really need to send an Allegiant capt. through upt or could you simply do a 6mo transition course and put him in the reserves?
You probably are not a prior service pilot. Even the simplest mission is more complicated than an Allegiant PIE-BUF flight. C-130s do a great deal of formation, low level, airdrop, NVG work. Hurricane Hunters, anyone. C-17s refuel relatively frequently and do NVG missions into hostile fire areas. Leading a cell of tankers to a flight of fighters in mid-ocean. It’s rarely like airlines.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 11:55 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
That was my point, to come up with a system that draws on the experience pool in the airlines. Do you really need to send an Allegiant capt. through upt or could you simply do a 6mo transition course and put him in the reserves?
We already have that for the type of flying for which airline experience is directly relevant, it's called CRAF. Except you don't join the reserves, you just do it while working for your airline employer. The military typically contracts out most "airline style" flying missions.

Tactical flying, as GF described, is quite a bit more involved. Point A-to-B airline flying is probably only about 5% of what a fighter pilot needs to concern himself with (especially since all fighter pilots today are actually multi-mission fighter/attack pilots). Mobility pilots have a closer correlation to airline flying but it's still a big delta.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 01:55 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 745
Default

Where is the greatest need currently? What type of flying?
Joachim is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 02:33 PM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
Where is the greatest need currently? What type of flying?
Fighters.
.......
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 02:55 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

And considering the considerable learning curve, it will be ever thus. Add in the fact that mobility pilots can’t be sent over to become tacair pilots, your idea won’t solve the problem by freeing up mobility crew dogs.

I’ve done everything from bank checks at night, tactical air, mobility air, airline, corporate. Airline was the simplest and most organized for success. As it should be, but the experience doesn’t transfer to more, shall we say, demanding or disorganized ops. There’s also the whole “Officer” thing going on, which isn’t remotely like being a captain.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 03:09 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
Where is the greatest need currently? What type of flying?
There isn't one.
It is a team getting the job done.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
Career Questions
39
07-14-2018 12:05 PM
SayAlt
Major
51
05-12-2015 04:56 AM
iahflyr
Regional
98
12-06-2014 08:44 AM
Lear45driver
Hangar Talk
110
06-13-2013 07:38 AM
jelloy683
Regional
3
08-02-2007 04:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices