Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

C17 question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2021 | 05:44 AM
  #1  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default C17 question.

I’ve noticed lately in the coverage of Afghanistan failure, that the thrust reversers are deployed while aircraft are parked. Personnel are loading. Can’t tell for sure if engines are running. Why?
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 07:23 AM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,864
Likes: 658
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Probably keep the engines running while minimize idle thrust in the loading area.
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 10:51 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 565
Likes: 6
From: Poolside
Default

That would be a “hot” on-load. Pretty typical for that kind of hostile environment. Get ‘em on and GTHOT!
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 11:49 AM
  #4  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default

They didn't seem to be in a hurry in the pics. I understand keeping the engines running so you can get out quickly, but FOD and other injury might seem to be a concern. Besides, the thrust blockers only block the fan not the core. But, whatever ya'll say.
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 12:24 PM
  #5  
HoursHore's Avatar
Thx Age 65
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 21
From: MD11CAP
Default

Considering they’re at Kabul with no Maint and no huffers, they probably left them running to avoid the slight possibility that they wouldn’t start again.
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 02:52 PM
  #6  
maxing the min/Moderator
20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 15
From: 757
Default

Originally Posted by HoursHore
Considering they’re at Kabul with no Maint and no huffers, they probably left them running to avoid the slight possibility that they wouldn’t start again.

Yes procedures for engine running off/onload is to have the engines in reverse idle. This directs the exhaust upward so as to not hurt anyone.
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 03:12 PM
  #7  
Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 712
Likes: 100
From: Airline Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
They didn't seem to be in a hurry in the pics. I understand keeping the engines running so you can get out quickly, but FOD and other injury might seem to be a concern. Besides, the thrust blockers only block the fan not the core. But, whatever ya'll say.
Incorrect.

yb18cmuxlfn11.jpg
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
MooseAg03's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Default

Yep, and a core TR disagree was a reason to pull the fire handle. No way to know if hydraulics were leaking into the core, I had it happen twice. Once at Al Asad and the other at home station.

EROs are the best way to keep ground time to a minimum. I would imagine they had crews doing double or triple shuttles in a single duty day to get as many people out as possible. Part of me is really glad to no longer be active duty, but part of me wishes I had been there to help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 04:31 PM
  #9  
MoosePileit's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: The IPA EB speaks for me
Default

Technically, the plane is more reliable if you don't shut down.

Burn is only about 1000 #/hr/motor.

A T/R issue is the risk, but worth the gains. 4 childbirths on these fllights I heard.
Reply
Old 08-31-2021 | 06:48 PM
  #10  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by MooseAg03
Yep, and a core TR disagree was a reason to pull the fire handle. No way to know if hydraulics were leaking into the core, I had it happen twice. Once at Al Asad and the other at home station.

EROs are the best way to keep ground time to a minimum. I would imagine they had crews doing double or triple shuttles in a single duty day to get as many people out as possible. Part of me is really glad to no longer be active duty, but part of me wishes I had been there to help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moose -

I'm going to guess the latter half of your statement.
This is probably a HIGHLIGHT of anyone's career in strat lift I'd imagine.
Humanitarian lift - especially under such conditions as these - has to be high on the list of major career satisfaction and something that I bet those crews will be telling their grandkids about.

LIVES SAVED PERIOD.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Horizon513
Hangar Talk
5
08-08-2010 10:27 AM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices