![]() |
So I've had an interesting turn of events over the last week in regards to retention. Basically, I'm trying to work a deal to get what I wanted in the first place- don't PCS me and let me fly. I've been talking with my commander about withdrawing my 7-day opt voluntary separation and staying as a free agent with no ADSC. My base's flying squadrons are losing FGOs in droves (surprise) so AFPC might actually go for it. I'm still doing research and waiting on some answers to make sure there are no loopholes in the AFI they can get me with, but it's looking promising. My intent is to keep building hours and drop applications as soon as I hit the mins for the majors, then punch when I want on my own terms. I feel like this is smart if I can pull it off, but please tell me if I'm an idiot.
|
Originally Posted by DirtyPurple
(Post 3357455)
They do acknowledge a pending FGO shortage in the screenshot…if it’s the best situation for your family, it doesn’t hurt to ask. |
I have no sympathy for a bunch of government idiots who force pilots out of the cockpits as they make rank. The Chair Force creates their own problems.
|
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
(Post 3358118)
I have no sympathy for a bunch of government idiots who force pilots out of the cockpits as they make rank. The Chair Force creates their own problems.
|
Prior active duty and long time Reservist here. Currently sitting as a SQ/CC.
One problem I’m having is my manning document, specifically that I’m limited in size. I only have so many slots I can hire to and pit overages against. I would hire more, but I only have so many flight hours and simulator periods to allocate. If they plus up my manning document, I can hire more folks from active duty. We are turning away some high quality pilots because insimolybdont have the room. Im at 125% manned as it is. I just pushed the retirement button. I just saw the headline that POTUS is considering sending 50,000 troops. Looked like there’s a a chance I will be stop-lossed. What a fitting end to a 26 year career.. |
Originally Posted by RustyShacklford
(Post 3357751)
So I've had an interesting turn of events over the last week in regards to retention. Basically, I'm trying to work a deal to get what I wanted in the first place- don't PCS me and let me fly. I've been talking with my commander about withdrawing my 7-day opt voluntary separation and staying as a free agent with no ADSC. My base's flying squadrons are losing FGOs in droves (surprise) so AFPC might actually go for it. I'm still doing research and waiting on some answers to make sure there are no loopholes in the AFI they can get me with, but it's looking promising. My intent is to keep building hours and drop applications as soon as I hit the mins for the majors, then punch when I want on my own terms. I feel like this is smart if I can pull it off, but please tell me if I'm an idiot.
|
Originally Posted by Av8tr1
(Post 3358821)
If the Ukraine situation pops off, you may be an idiot. (Unless you want to trade kinetic insults with people showing the wrong gage signs) If it doesn't now is as good a time as any to punch out.
|
Get your ducks in a row and get out ASAP. Seniority, seniority, seniority. Russia/China/Ukraine/Iran, whatever...if any of it pops off, we're all getting stop-lossed, activated, recalled, and for others...probably drafted. Flying hub turns one day will be the least of our worries. But, if you get out and get hired now, you'll have that line number waiting for you after we win. Good luck.
|
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3359100)
Get your ducks in a row and get out ASAP. Seniority, seniority, seniority. Russia/China/Ukraine/Iran, whatever...if any of it pops off, we're all getting stop-lossed, activated, recalled, and for others...probably drafted. Flying hub turns one day will be the least of our worries. But, if you get out and get hired now, you'll have that line number waiting for you after we win. Good luck.
I guess it needs to be said - if the fireworks over Kiev spread to a NATO country or if anything happens that leads to a Cold War style great power rivalry on European soil again, expect that the WARNORD's will not spare you even if you're recently retired. Retirement orders usually state that you are subject to recall and mobilization even AFTER retirement (from AD or the SELRES); remember, retiring is NOT the same as resigning your commission. If you retire, your commission is still in effect and you absolutely can be recalled and sent to whatever circle jerk we're in. This even happened to some retirees during OIF/OEF though it wasn't common. Either way, if you're under 65 and either retired, planning to retire soon or AD/SELRES, you are fair game if the **** really starts to go off over there. In a real conflict, the canary in the coal mine is definitely to what extent they stop loss discharges/retirees and recall the IRR. That being said, it's unlikely it'll get to the point imo. |
It is what it is…
10 U.S. Code § 688 - Retired members: authority to order to active duty; dutiesprev | next (a)Authority.— Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, a member described in subsection (b) may be ordered to active dutyby the Secretary of the military department concerned at any time. (b)Covered Members.—Except as provided in subsection (d), subsection (a) applies to the following members of the armed forces: (1) A retired member of the Regular Army,RegularNavy,Regular Air Force, or RegularMarine Corps. (2) A member of the Retired Reserve who was retired under section 1293, 7311, 7314, 8323, 9311, or 9314 of this title. (3) A member of the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine CorpsReserve. https://i.ibb.co/h10GCsG/EC17-A11-E-...2-BF23-BE1.jpg |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3359805)
It is what it is…
FWIW, if they ever do invade, it'll be over so fast I doubt we'll ever get to stop loss or retiree recalls. Putin has everything east of the Dnieper surrounded on three sides, and this terrain is Rommel's wet dream for an armored invasion because it's completely flat and frozen this time of year. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3359795)
^^^^ This. Exactly this.
I guess it needs to be said - if the fireworks over Kiev spread to a NATO country or if anything happens that leads to a Cold War style great power rivalry on European soil again, expect that the WARNORD's will not spare you even if you're recently retired. Retirement orders usually state that you are subject to recall and mobilization even AFTER retirement (from AD or the SELRES); remember, retiring is NOT the same as resigning your commission. If you retire, your commission is still in effect and you absolutely can be recalled and sent to whatever circle jerk we're in. This even happened to some retirees during OIF/OEF though it wasn't common. Either way, if you're under 65 and either retired, planning to retire soon or AD/SELRES, you are fair game if the **** really starts to go off over there. In a real conflict, the canary in the coal mine is definitely to what extent they stop loss discharges/retirees and recall the IRR. That being said, it's unlikely it'll get to the point imo. |
Originally Posted by JTwift
(Post 3359828)
mid I got recalled to AD, they better not expect me to pass a PT test, I’ll tell you that much.
|
Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
(Post 3358776)
Prior active duty and long time Reservist here. Currently sitting as a SQ/CC.
One problem I’m having is my manning document, specifically that I’m limited in size. I only have so many slots I can hire to and pit overages against. I would hire more, but I only have so many flight hours and simulator periods to allocate. If they plus up my manning document, I can hire more folks from active duty. We are turning away some high quality pilots because insimolybdont have the room. Im at 125% manned as it is. I just pushed the retirement button. I just saw the headline that POTUS is considering sending 50,000 troops. Looked like there’s a a chance I will be stop-lossed. What a fitting end to a 26 year career.. For anyone out there reading this thread, don't think the USAF has 2000 cockpits sitting empty. It's staff wiener positions that are sitting empty, not jets. Get rid of half the GO's, and their bloated staffs and you can cut 75% of that pilot shortage. Stop cutting flight hours and let dudes actually stay in the jet and the problem is solved. Want to put on O-6, then play the game. Want to stay in the jet and fly your whole career, terminal O-3/4 at 20. Better yet let the AD guys follow a ANG/AFR construct and never PCS and have stable family lives. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3359824)
FWIW, if they ever do invade, it'll be over so fast I doubt we'll ever get to stop loss or retiree recalls. Putin has everything east of the Dnieper surrounded on three sides, and this terrain is Rommel's wet dream for an armored invasion because it's completely flat and frozen this time of year.
Question is do we go in and dig him out? That's a pretty far bridge. But at the very likely we'd at build up forces in and around Western Europe to look tough... sounds like ideal utilization for over-the-hill IRR and retirees. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3360027)
Yes. No real question about preventing an invasion unless we first build up forces in UK.
Question is do we go in and dig him out? That's a pretty far bridge. But at the very likely we'd at build up forces in and around Western Europe to look tough... sounds like ideal utilization for over-the-hill IRR and retirees. https://youtu.be/bJaSIUCPZKc ‘Twas ever thus…’ |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3360027)
Yes. No real question about preventing an invasion unless we first build up forces in UK.
Question is do we go in and dig him out? That's a pretty far bridge. But at the very likely we'd at build up forces in and around Western Europe to look tough... sounds like ideal utilization for over-the-hill IRR and retirees. https://media1.tenor.com/images/a01d...temid=13360691 |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3360027)
Yes. No real question about preventing an invasion unless we first build up forces in UK.
Question is do we go in and dig him out? That's a pretty far bridge. But at the very likely we'd at build up forces in and around Western Europe to look tough... sounds like ideal utilization for over-the-hill IRR and retirees. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3359805)
It is what it is…
For that matter, even if you’ve never served you might be in the frag pattern…. https://i.ibb.co/h10GCsG/EC17-A11-E-...2-BF23-BE1.jpg |
Originally Posted by Av8tr1
(Post 3360625)
It has occasionally crossed my mind if I could be called back. Due to injuries sustained in the line of duty I lost my flight status and was sent home. Hold a 90% rating (nothing that the FAA is worried about before anyone starts). I can still shoot a gun, carry a ruck and make a helicopter dance on the head of a pin (and am current). Think there is ever a snowballs chance in hell they would call me back short of armed militia guarding what is left of the country?
|
For the COIN conflicts of the last decade they were very concerned with medical fitness when recalling reserves (even SELRES/TR), that was because they did not want to bring in someone who could claim an pre-existing condition to angle for a medical retirement upon exiting AD. It doesn't matter if it was pre-existing, you can still claim benefits once on AD (especially if the condition was aggravated or got worse).
IMO if the pop really hits the fan the DoD will be far less concerned with medical fitness for older, experienced personnel (especially staff qualified senior O's). I suspect there will be different medical policies for junior rifle carriers than those with other specific skills. I've seen those kinds of waivers for high-demand low-density skillsets, even during GWOT. The hypothetical long-term potential cost of dealing with medical issues would pale in comparison to the requirements to conduct (or constrain) a ground war in Europe. Politically it would be much easier to incur costs (that's what DoD does best!) then to deal with the political repercussions of a draft. Especially since the draft gets you mostly junior rifle carriers, not experienced leadership. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3359805)
It is what it is…
For that matter, even if you’ve never served you might be in the frag pattern…. https://i.ibb.co/h10GCsG/EC17-A11-E-...2-BF23-BE1.jpg |
They try to drag me back they better come with a lot of friends.
Its not me they have to worry about. Its my wife. She's a far better shot than I am. Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3361017)
They try to drag me back they better come with a lot of friends.
Its not me they have to worry about. Its my wife. She's a far better shot than I am. Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk |
Ya. Just like the zero approved waivers out of 716ish applied for at my NOSC.
Fun fact. Got a call from the nosc demanding I show proof of vaccination. And my motorcycle safety course as it expired in November. I've been retired since December 1st. Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3361313)
Ya. Just like the zero approved waivers out of 716ish applied for at my NOSC.
Fun fact. Got a call from the nosc demanding I show proof of vaccination. And my motorcycle safety course as it expired in November. I've been retired since December 1st. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands