![]() |
USAF tackles pilot shortage:
Air Force Strategies Chipping Away at Pilot Shortfall. Ramped-up retention efforts and new training programs are helping, slowly:
https://www.flyingmag.com/air-force-...lot-shortfall/ |
Big Blue is tone-deaf when it come to retention. The only play they have is offering mediocre money on terms no one wants.
"I want to stay at my base and keep flying. I want to instruct at the schoolhouse. I want a stable life for my family." "Oh, ok. You want a bonus and want to commit to more ADSC. Well you're not eligible yet." "No, I just want to stay here and keep flying, I want a stable life for my family." "Oooooh. Well how 'bout we non'vol you to UPT then. A big, disruptive move will be good for your family." "Goodbye." "Well in that case, here's a 6 month non-flying deployment you ungrateful bastard." |
Originally Posted by RustyShacklford
(Post 3354455)
Big Blue is tone-deaf when it come to retention. The only play they have is offering mediocre money on terms no one wants.
"I want to stay at my base and keep flying. I want to instruct at the schoolhouse. I want a stable life for my family." "Oh, ok. You want a bonus and want to commit to more ADSC. Well you're not eligible yet." "No, I just want to stay here and keep flying, I want a stable life for my family." "Oooooh. Well how 'bout we non'vol you to UPT then. A big, disruptive move will be good for your family." "Goodbye." "Well in that case, here's a 6 month non-flying deployment you ungrateful bastard." |
Originally Posted by 52Flyer
(Post 3354461)
This, so much this ∆∆∆
(this one actually happened at my squadron) |
I love to see that all the branches hate their pilots equally. The moment you aren't the solution they want regardless of your work ethic, prior history, and contributions, you are immediately considered part of the problem.
On the Army side the helo guys were told this exact quote by the senior warrant officer of the aviation branch; "If the Air Force loses its pilots, it's not the Air Force. If the Army loses its pilots, it's still the Army." That was three years ago and the bleeding hasn't stopped...so they instituted a 10 year obligation POST flight school. It had been six. Hope the Army guys don't share their brilliant ideas to fix the problem with your people. |
Originally Posted by new guy
(Post 3354506)
I love to see that all the branches hate their pilots equally. The moment you aren't the solution they want regardless of your work ethic, prior history, and contributions, you are immediately considered part of the problem.
On the Army side the helo guys were told this exact quote by the senior warrant officer of the aviation branch; "If the Air Force loses its pilots, it's not the Air Force. If the Army loses its pilots, it's still the Army." That was three years ago and the bleeding hasn't stopped...so they instituted a 10 year obligation POST flight school. It had been six. Hope the Army guys don't share their brilliant ideas to fix the problem with your people. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3354513)
..., but NOBODY is staying especially not for the 35K/yr bonus to sign away 10 more yrs of their lives.
|
Originally Posted by new guy
(Post 3354506)
I love to see that all the branches hate their pilots equally. The moment you aren't the solution they want regardless of your work ethic, prior history, and contributions, you are immediately considered part of the problem.
On the Army side the helo guys were told this exact quote by the senior warrant officer of the aviation branch; "If the Air Force loses its pilots, it's not the Air Force. If the Army loses its pilots, it's still the Army." That was three years ago and the bleeding hasn't stopped...so they instituted a 10 year obligation POST flight school. It had been six. Hope the Army guys don't share their brilliant ideas to fix the problem with your people. The Army has one advantage over the other branches that will always ensure a ready supply of pilots - it doesn't require a college degree and will literally train pilots straight out of high school. Never underestimate the recruiting potential of giving an 18 year old the prospect of flying an Apache; it's an endless, bottomless pit of willing recruits who don't care about QOL, family concerns, pay/incentives or how often they have to PCS. |
Originally Posted by new guy
(Post 3354517)
That's it?! 35k a year for you guys with your ratings/ certs? Versus your pay scale outside? They are impressively out of touch. Did that program I read annoy in 2017/2018 every go through? It was to offer two paths; one being the traditional move up, hold command positions, staff, blah both blah traditional route and the other was geared to letting the flyers be flyers over the course of their career. It seemed like a real way to address the issue seen in your industry is moving up means moving away from hit flight line.
As always, take this with a large grain of salt. My info came a long way down through the grapevine. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3354536)
The Army literally treats their pilots like they are ground pounders who also happen to know how to fly.
And that statement is exactly right. Sergeant Majors hated flight suits and finally convinced the brass to get rid of it. You're just like everyone else in the Army Soldier, with the exception of the cost of your training literally quadrupling any other field that WE actually train. Sorry to have hijacked the thread. I genuinely feel worse for the AF guys because when you come into the Army, they let you know you're a garbage person day one. The AF always had the globo-gym feel for QOL. "Here at Air Force, we're better than you, and we know it." Now it looks like even that's going away for the pilots. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3354536)
The Army literally treats their pilots like they are ground pounders who also happen to know how to fly. 20 years ago, army aviators could at least wear flight suits. Now even the FW army pilots wear ACU's or whatever they're called now, which is ridiculous. I can't imagine wearing NWU's in the cockpit - they're already hot and uncomfortable, definitely not designed for that on a humid summer day. I still can't believe the army took away your flight suits - it's like it bothered them too much that you weren't as miserable in some facet of your lives as the rest of them.
The Army has one advantage over the other branches that will always ensure a ready supply of pilots - it doesn't require a college degree and will literally train pilots straight out of high school. Never underestimate the recruiting potential of giving an 18 year old the prospect of flying an Apache; it's an endless, bottomless pit of willing recruits who don't care about QOL, family concerns, pay/incentives or how often they have to PCS. |
Originally Posted by new guy
(Post 3354544)
The year was 2007. I remember it well. It didn't effect me as much because I was in year two of flight school, but all the instructors lost their minds.
And that statement is exactly right. Sergeant Majors hated flight suits and finally convinced the brass to get rid of it. You're just like everyone else in the Army Soldier, with the exception of the cost of your training literally quadrupling any other field that WE actually train. Sorry to have hijacked the thread. I genuinely feel worse for the AF guys because when you come into the Army, they let you know you're a garbage person day one. The AF always had the globo-gym feel for QOL. "Here at Air Force, we're better than you, and we know it." Now it looks like even that's going away for the pilots. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Av8tr1
(Post 3354545)
To be fair the flight suits sucked too. Never warm enough in the winter and too hot in the summer. But I’d rather have that then what is issued now.
|
Originally Posted by new guy
(Post 3354517)
That's it?! 35k a year for you guys with your ratings/ certs? Versus your pay scale outside? They are impressively out of touch. Did that program I read annoy in 2017/2018 every go through? It was to offer two paths; one being the traditional move up, hold command positions, staff, blah both blah traditional route and the other was geared to letting the flyers be flyers over the course of their career. It seemed like a real way to address the issue seen in your industry is moving up means moving away from hit flight line.
|
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3354559)
To be faaaaaair, everything is relative I guess. I love my flight suit, wish I could wear it in the 121 world. Show me something better. The Navy has some pretty decent accoutrements for cold weather flying, so I've got no complaints.
I’ve got one and love it. I can layer up under it or take a layer off if it’s hot. Easier to put on or take off. So much better then the old adult onesie. Makes pooping soooooo much easier. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3354632)
And that's the high end. Some AFSCs were offered as low as 10K/yr. The offer was/is a total joke. Any worthwhile idea guys have sent up of course is shot down. The stars in DC want to divest the force badly; not just because we need to since all of our jets are falling apart, but also it will artificially solve the pilot shortage. Don't need that many pilots when you barely have any airworthy jets.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3354667)
Guess they shouldn't have gooned up Space so badly that it got taken away from them.
|
I guess this is unpatriotic of me....but I just really struggle to take the "Space Force" seriously....I know what they do, and I have friends that were in AFSPC and I'm not saying it's not important.....but "Space Force"?
I just can't wrap my head around this being anything but a Steve Carrell show on Netflix.... |
Originally Posted by Av8tr1
(Post 3354684)
right???? Air Force has “airmen”. Navy has “seamen” so what does space force go with? “Guardian” some quality leadership there. or big fans of some quality Saturday sci-fi cartoons. JFC……
I guess this is unpatriotic of me....but I just really struggle to take the "Space Force" seriously....I know what they do, and I have friends that were in AFSPC and I'm not saying it's not important.....but "Space Force"? I just can't wrap my head around this being anything but a Steve Carrell show on Netflix.... |
Originally Posted by TipTanks
(Post 3354708)
I guess this is unpatriotic of me....but I just really struggle to take the "Space Force" seriously....I know what they do, and I have friends that were in AFSPC and I'm not saying it's not important.....but "Space Force"?
I just can't wrap my head around this being anything but a Steve Carrell show on Netflix.... They've been planning this since the 80's... if the Soviet Union hadn't collapsed I'm sure this would have come to fruition by the mid 90's at least. The US govt even funded a pretty badass propaganda animation series for kids about it. It's like GI Joe in space with anime: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKZfwih-3dM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starco...S._Space_Force |
Originally Posted by new guy
(Post 3354517)
Did that program I read annoy in 2017/2018 every go through? It was to offer two paths; one being the traditional move up, hold command positions, staff, blah both blah traditional route and the other was geared to letting the flyers be flyers over the course of their career. It seemed like a real way to address the issue seen in your industry is moving up means moving away from hit flight line.
|
Originally Posted by Av8tr1
(Post 3354666)
the newer two piece flight suits. https://www.uspatriottactical.com/ma...hoC7hgQAvD_BwE
I’ve got one and love it. I can layer up under it or take a layer off if it’s hot. Easier to put on or take off. So much better then the old adult onesie. Makes pooping soooooo much easier. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3354863)
In Army digital camo, no doubt. I've seen something similar to this on our end, but I'll pass and stick with my olive green onesie that my father and my father's father wore, thanks :)
But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear. Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast. |
Originally Posted by kaputt
(Post 3354834)
A space focused force is not a bad idea. I’ve sat in on some of the briefs of what our near peer competitors (especially one in particular) are doing or want to do in space. The space dudes are nerds, but important nerds, and getting out of the shadow of the Air Force has helped and will help them focus on their mission. Totally agree on the name being a miss though. Pulling from the RUMINT wheel again, but apparently Space Corps was under heavy consideration, but the Marines threw a fit over the possibility of the word Corps being added to the end of Space.
"YOU'RE joining the Corps after graduation??? How many pullups can you do?" "None. How many DDoS attacks can you execute in 90 seconds?" You could have made the same argument for a Cyber Force, perhaps with more urgency. Although we kind of already have a national cyber force comprised of NSA and their not-so-loose affiliation with cybercom and it's subordinate elements. |
Military Uniform stupidity is ingrained in the culture. Once upon a time NORAD - in a fit of concern over midair’s - painted all their tip tanks day-glo orange. Then yo up the ante, got day-glo orange flight suits. When the squadrons eventually rotated to SEA and got shot down, they found a real dearth of day-glo orange vegetation to hide in.
Later on a USAF Chief of staff was also uniform obsessed. Came up with a number of different uniforms - that no one but he liked. https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0109uniform/ Fortunately, he only held that position for three years and the institution slow-rolled his idiocy until someone more reasonable replaced him. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-3ab085817d68/ I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3355024)
I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer.
|
Meh. I like the blue.
|
Originally Posted by hydrostream
(Post 3355188)
Meh. I like the blue.
|
Originally Posted by Hobbit64
(Post 3354963)
back in the late 90’s when the AVN BDU’s came out, their cost was 4 times what a one piece flight suit cost. And they wore out much faster. Stupid!
But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear. Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast. The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3355251)
You're right but I think there' s a distinct difference between how the navy treats aviation versus how the army treats aviation. Naval aviation is given its own priority and isn't competing with the air force - we've got our own C130's, our own 737 transports, etc., and aviators in VP, VR and VQ squadrons (P-8, C-37. C-40, C-130, EP-3, E-6) never touch the blue water navy, never have to do underway cruises, never get to find their sea legs, pretty much don't touch water at all their entire careers in the navy unless they request a non-flying u/w tour which is pretty much just to get the sea service ribbon. Even in the USMC, where every marine is a rifleman and marine pilots still get infantry training in TBS, there is no one size fits all "you better blend in" aviator envy with the rest of their branch the way that the army tries to make their aviators lose their own identities. The way the army treats its aviators is definitely unique among the branches.
The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right. If I remember correctly, the Army COS gave the -27's away in exchange for another ground Combat Brigade, that I am sure has since been stood down. Meh!, no longer my problem or fight. As I type, my retirement paperwork is making its way through the 7 layers of the candy-cane forest. Due to the bureaucratic delays in processing said freedom packet, I have made it clear that I myself already 'identify' as a retired soul. |
Originally Posted by Hobbit64
(Post 3355287)
PREACH!!!
If I remember correctly, the Army COS gave the -27's away in exchange for another ground Combat Brigade, that I am sure has since been stood down. Meh!, no longer my problem or fight. As I type, my retirement paperwork is making its way through the 7 layers of the candy-cane forest. Due to the bureaucratic delays in processing said freedom packet, I have made it clear that I myself already 'identify' as a retired soul. |
Originally Posted by Hobbit64
(Post 3355287)
PREACH!!!
If I remember correctly, the Army COS gave the -27's away in exchange for another ground Combat Brigade, that I am sure has since been stood down. Meh!, no longer my problem or fight. As I type, my retirement paperwork is making its way through the 7 layers of the candy-cane forest. Due to the bureaucratic delays in processing said freedom packet, I have made it clear that I myself already 'identify' as a retired soul. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3355347)
Congratulations on making it and thank you for your service.
I will miss the People. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3355366)
Congrats brother, and TYFYS! I'll be joining you shortly if my next reserve billet isn't at least in my time zone. One of my ex-squadron mates who is retired specifically bids MCO layovers for every Nov 11th so he can get his free bloomin' onion at the airport Outback there - can't wait until that's the highlight of my retiree life! :D
I can't wait until the pronoun people echelons above reality produce the retirement paperwork and their view of my status matches my view of the world. |
Originally Posted by paulcg77
(Post 3354536)
The Army literally treats their pilots like they are ground pounders who also happen to know how to fly.
20 years ago, army aviators could at least wear flight suits. Now even the FW army pilots wear ACU's or whatever they're called now, which is ridiculous... Second part, CSM or MAJ Butthurt/Good Idea Fairy (or whoever the f came up with it) got upset that pilots didn't look like everyone else with their flight suits, so we got the A2CU so we can look like everyone else yet have a functional flight suit. However... during any big formations we couldn't wear our A2CUs because they still look different from normal ACUs. Well what was the whole point of going to the A2CU from the one piece flight suit if we still couldn't wear them? Good Idea Fairy struck again. I know you're an adult (20s, 30s, 40s with many years of adulting) and an officer, but if you want to go somewhere on your own time you need to put in for a pass. Go see the kid straight out of college to get approval for your pass to have a life outside of the Army. By the way, did you have someone do a personal vehicle inspection for you? I know they're not a qualified mechanic, but they still need to sign this paper saying your vehicle - which you know and they don't - is safe for you to travel in. The Army went to a 10 year commitment after flight school?? |
Originally Posted by RustyShacklford
(Post 3354845)
From what I understand only two C-17 guys took the "fly only" track deal. They were only offering it to the folks who were at the stay in/get out decision point in their careers anyway, and most had already made up their mind or feared it as just another bait-and-switch trap. They should've offered it to senior captains and junior majors. I know a lot of guys who probably would've jumped right on.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3355193)
Honestly it was the cut more than the color... might be OK if you have a good personal tailor.
Anyways, I looked at my time in the Army as a service I was doing not a career. I joined to learn to fly and go to war, then move on with my life. I enjoyed most of my time in the Army but I’m not sure any amount of money would have kept me around. |
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3354441)
Air Force Strategies Chipping Away at Pilot Shortfall. Ramped-up retention efforts and new training programs are helping, slowly:
https://www.flyingmag.com/air-force-...lot-shortfall/ |
Originally Posted by Duffman
(Post 3357476)
During COVID, with zero attrition, they were only able to decrease the shortage by 300 pilots? How long have the Majors been hiring? 6 Months? It takes time to leave the military, even without a service commitment. With AA, DAL, and UAL each hiring 200+ a month, I'm betting there are tons of guys who are "still on the books" with the AF even though they're out the door. The AF only produces 1200 pilots a year, or roughly 2 months of legacy hiring numbers. If they really don't see these numbers as a Master Warning, they're dangerously out of touch. They might be on glideslope, but their descent rate is about to be 2000 fpm.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands