Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Army aviation cuts…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2025 | 07:42 AM
  #1  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,187
Likes: 239
Default Army aviation cuts…

Army cutting 6,500 aviation jobs in overhaul toward drones

The service will hold "talent panels" to retain aviation officers and warrant officers as pilots or to reassign them to other roles in the Army.PATTY NIEBERG

PUBLISHED SEP 19, 2025 10:41 AM EDT

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army...usands-pilots/

​​​​​The Army is slashing thousands of active duty pilots, flight crews, and helicopter maintenance jobs as the service begins a fundamental pivot towards unmanned drones for modern wars, officials told Task & Purpose.

The service will begin cutting nearly 6,500 active duty aviation jobs in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 as part of the Army’s broader transformation initiative.


The Army currently has around 30,000 aviation branch soldiers, but “talent panels” scheduled for October will decide which officers and warrant officers will be retained and which will transfer to a different branch within the Army. The service will also decide whether to hold similar talent panels for its enlisted aviation soldiers, which includes most flight crew and nearly all mechanics and maintenance troops, Army officials said.

“The use of airspace for maneuver that was once unique to our formations is now becoming accessible to soldiers in multiple formations via drone technology,” Maj. Montrell Russell, an Army spokesperson, told Task & Purpose. “The Army is rapidly transforming to meet the changing character of war and leverage these technological advancements, which is inducing changes in both ground and air formations to optimize our collective force structure.”

The strategy to cut aviators is a switch from the Army’s efforts to fill out its pilot force less than a decade ago. In 2019, the service offered pay raises and promotion opportunities to meet a warrant officer shortage of almost 700 soldiers.


​​
Reply
Old 09-19-2025 | 05:06 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog

Army cutting 6,500 aviation jobs in overhaul toward drones

Warfare is changing quite rapidly

http://youtube.com/shorts/thDYPXVXhkw

$16,000,000 helicopter downed by a $600 OTS drone
Reply
Old 09-19-2025 | 07:35 PM
  #3  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,187
Likes: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbit64
Warfare is changing quite rapidly

http://youtube.com/shorts/thDYPXVXhkw

$16,000,000 helicopter downed by a $600 OTS drone
Nothing like a war to spur technical innovation - not just on both sides but even among neutrals nd other non participants.
Reply
Old 09-20-2025 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Nothing like a war to spur technical innovation - not just on both sides but even among neutrals nd other non participants.
This transformation goes back to Armenia vs Azerbaijan; for those paying attention at least. RU vs UK solidified the issue.

The USMC was leaning forward in the foxhole on this.
Reply
Old 09-21-2025 | 03:07 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 565
Likes: 6
From: Poolside
Default

It’s sad to see as I have so many current and former Army aviator friends. However, I would not be surprised if drones (and the next unannounced weapon of the future) make Army (Navy, and even conventional Air Force) aviation as obsolete as the aircraft carrier did to battleships in WWII.
Reply
Old 09-21-2025 | 06:10 AM
  #6  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,187
Likes: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Peabody17
It’s sad to see as I have so many current and former Army aviator friends. However, I would not be surprised if drones (and the next unannounced weapon of the future) make Army (Navy, and even conventional Air Force) aviation as obsolete as the aircraft carrier did to battleships in WWII.
We talked for years about high-low mix, but the money and hence the lobbying always went to the high mix, as did the jobs - parceled out to various states and countries to assure maximum political support which - unfortunately - always drives the cost of the high mix higher while increasing supply chain vulnerabilities. Then as if we didn’t already know what this does to the economics and time schedule for weapons procurement, Congress adds investigates and adds new paperwork and oversight requirements to further complicate the process. Then “saves” money by decreasing the numbers of the high mix items (driving up their unit costs) quietly dropping the low mix (and arguably more cost effective) items altogether.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CleeIB
Hangar Talk
10459
03-23-2026 03:17 PM
JCPearce8
Flight Schools and Training
8
10-14-2019 09:13 AM
Fetzervalve
Part 135
43
02-04-2016 09:46 AM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
aileronjam
Hiring News
17
11-11-2008 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices