Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

SAC is back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2009 | 05:50 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Default SAC is back

When the TAC hostile takeover occurred back in 92, most SAC guys I knew where saying Strategic Air Command (SAC) would be back. It only took 17 years.

AF Global Strike Command Activated
Reply
Old 08-16-2009 | 05:55 PM
  #2  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 51
From: Legacy FO
Default

Wow that is really cool. I heard about this at the school I am attending, but I thought they meant just missiles. I wonder if they will acquire some tankers???
Reply
Old 08-16-2009 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

In name only - there is no leadership left that could bring the real mission-first SAC back.
Reply
Old 08-16-2009 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Talking Remember this one?

"To err is human,
to forgive, divine.
Neither one is SAC policy."
Reply
Old 08-16-2009 | 10:26 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

At least they weren't failing nuke surety inspections as often as they are now, 5 in 2008 alone according to this: Washington Times - EXCLUSIVE: Air Force fails new nuclear reviews .

Also: 5th Bomb Wing flunks nuclear inspection - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times and 341st Missile Wing fails nuke inspection - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times

I'd be happy if we could just get back to where mission accomplishment takes precedent over political correctness.
Reply
Old 08-16-2009 | 11:32 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Default

I read a study years ago where the author concluded it was statistically impossible to handle as many Nukes as SAC did and not have an accident which resulted in a significant yield. The only way they accomplished this is by using the quote below. I think America is glad SAC was unwilling to accept negligence, error and incompetence when it came to Nukes.


Originally Posted by tomgoodman
"To err is human,
to forgive, divine.
Neither one is SAC policy."
Reply
Old 08-17-2009 | 03:00 AM
  #7  
cficpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LivingInMEM
I'd be happy if we could just get back to where mission accomplishment takes precedent over political correctness.
The real problem is some actually think PC is the mission. All in all however still the best in the world thanks to the men and women who have served and at times made the un-popular choice of mission accomplishement over PC.
Reply
Old 08-17-2009 | 04:31 AM
  #8  
III Corps's Avatar
No one's home
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Default

We used to say, "A suck for SAC is a blow for freedom." The other was "Peace is our profession. War is our hobby." It was definitely a different culture.

I don't remember the year but in the middle of the night, the Sq Commander called and said, "Start the regeneration." I figured it was an exercise but he said it was the real deal. So, we repositioned all the airplanes; all the BUFs were repositioned and loaded with nukes. The BUF crews lived on the airplanes for about 3 days before we stood down. Interesting. Reportedly it was an incident with North Korea. We never got a full briefing on it.

But seeing all the nukes trotted out for real was a bit of an attention getter.
Reply
Old 08-17-2009 | 04:36 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

In military speak, maybe this administration will name it Force Air Global
Reply
Old 08-17-2009 | 10:37 AM
  #10  
TankerBob's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: KC-135T
Default

One thing we need to remember is that an organization is only as good as its leadership. Lets hope the new commander understands the importance of this, and revives the correct traditions and not the incorrect.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XSive
Regional
25
06-18-2009 04:10 PM
Badgeman
Aviation Law
10
05-11-2009 06:45 PM
Mitragorz
Your Photos and Videos
6
03-10-2009 04:20 AM
JetFlyer06
Pilot Health
0
08-23-2008 05:30 PM
shadow95
Military
17
08-22-2008 11:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices