SAC is back
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
SAC is back
When the TAC hostile takeover occurred back in 92, most SAC guys I knew where saying Strategic Air Command (SAC) would be back. It only took 17 years.
AF Global Strike Command Activated
AF Global Strike Command Activated
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
At least they weren't failing nuke surety inspections as often as they are now, 5 in 2008 alone according to this: Washington Times - EXCLUSIVE: Air Force fails new nuclear reviews .
Also: 5th Bomb Wing flunks nuclear inspection - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times and 341st Missile Wing fails nuke inspection - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times
I'd be happy if we could just get back to where mission accomplishment takes precedent over political correctness.
Also: 5th Bomb Wing flunks nuclear inspection - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times and 341st Missile Wing fails nuke inspection - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times
I'd be happy if we could just get back to where mission accomplishment takes precedent over political correctness.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
I read a study years ago where the author concluded it was statistically impossible to handle as many Nukes as SAC did and not have an accident which resulted in a significant yield. The only way they accomplished this is by using the quote below. I think America is glad SAC was unwilling to accept negligence, error and incompetence when it came to Nukes.
#7
The real problem is some actually think PC is the mission. All in all however still the best in the world thanks to the men and women who have served and at times made the un-popular choice of mission accomplishement over PC.
#8
We used to say, "A suck for SAC is a blow for freedom." The other was "Peace is our profession. War is our hobby." It was definitely a different culture.
I don't remember the year but in the middle of the night, the Sq Commander called and said, "Start the regeneration." I figured it was an exercise but he said it was the real deal. So, we repositioned all the airplanes; all the BUFs were repositioned and loaded with nukes. The BUF crews lived on the airplanes for about 3 days before we stood down. Interesting. Reportedly it was an incident with North Korea. We never got a full briefing on it.
But seeing all the nukes trotted out for real was a bit of an attention getter.
I don't remember the year but in the middle of the night, the Sq Commander called and said, "Start the regeneration." I figured it was an exercise but he said it was the real deal. So, we repositioned all the airplanes; all the BUFs were repositioned and loaded with nukes. The BUF crews lived on the airplanes for about 3 days before we stood down. Interesting. Reportedly it was an incident with North Korea. We never got a full briefing on it.
But seeing all the nukes trotted out for real was a bit of an attention getter.
#10
One thing we need to remember is that an organization is only as good as its leadership. Lets hope the new commander understands the importance of this, and revives the correct traditions and not the incorrect.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post