Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Air Force buying Ipads >

Air Force buying Ipads

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Air Force buying Ipads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2012, 04:41 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default Air Force buying Ipads

The Air Force is Buying iPads To Replace Pilots' Books and Maps | Popular Science
iceman49 is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 12:40 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Ogie Ogilthorpe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: 2 Min for Roughing
Posts: 33
Default

Let me guess, we'll get the IpadA
Ogie Ogilthorpe is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 01:43 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

No, what will happen is this:

1) The AF will award a contract for 18,000 iPads for AMC.
2) Acer, Asus, or Sony (or whoever) will file a complaint saying they're weren't given a fair shake.
3) The AF will cancel the iPad order
4) Capt _____ will still have to haul his 120 lb world-wide FLIP kit to the jet tomorrow.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 10:05 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirGunner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: King of somewhere hot....
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by CAFB 04-12 View Post
No, what will happen is this:

1) The AF will award a contract for 18,000 iPads for AMC.
2) Acer, Asus, or Sony (or whoever) will file a complaint saying they're weren't given a fair shake.
3) The AF will cancel the iPad order
4) Capt _____ will still have to haul his 120 lb world-wide FLIP kit to the jet tomorrow.
True statement...But you forgot to add that JWOD will complain for not being the "prime supplier."
AirGunner is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 01:15 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LowSlowT2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Default

Or do like AFSOC did - disable everything and turn the iPad into a very expensive e-reader...
LowSlowT2 is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 01:18 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

Making a Chinese built electronic product a key part of military infrastructure sounds like a great idea to me.
lolwut is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 01:23 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
Making a Chinese built electronic product a key part of military infrastructure sounds like a great idea to me.
Exactly. Countdown to comm squad panic meltdown tantrum just like the thumb drives.
surfnski is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 04:54 PM
  #8  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Power-Point Briefs and Foamy Picture-Boards

They were briefing a Two-Star today in my squadron. Guy doing the brief is a bro; I like him, and he does good work. I asked what he thought. "Great! No more paper!"

I asked if he, or anyone else, had tried flying with it in a fighter-type cockpit. I asked if anyone had tried it in bright sunlight, or dark night. I asked if it had been flown under high-g-load.

Nope.

But that is how these decisions are made.

The Air Force made a decision to put a new ejection seat in the T-38, at a cost of 1 million per jet. Sounded good on paper....but no one tried it as a prototype. Turns out you can't see squat from the back seat.

I think the ipads will not be that handy in a fighter-type airplane.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 06:23 PM
  #9  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
They were briefing a Two-Star today in my squadron. Guy doing the brief is a bro; I like him, and he does good work. I asked what he thought. "Great! No more paper!"

I asked if he, or anyone else, had tried flying with it in a fighter-type cockpit. I asked if anyone had tried it in bright sunlight, or dark night. I asked if it had been flown under high-g-load.

Nope.

But that is how these decisions are made.

The Air Force made a decision to put a new ejection seat in the T-38, at a cost of 1 million per jet. Sounded good on paper....but no one tried it as a prototype. Turns out you can't see squat from the back seat.

I think the ipads will not be that handy in a fighter-type airplane.
Given my druthers, I would prefer a single frequency GCA or a well integrated GPS/INS NAV system that already has all of the required information. The Ipad is just a poor substitute for what should already be part of an integrated nav system.
jungle is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 06:29 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirGunner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: King of somewhere hot....
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
I think the ipads will not be that handy in a fighter-type airplane.
Nor would they be to useful in a helicopter as well, especially flying with doors off like we do in the HH-60. Additionally, just think of the possible OPSEC repurcussions from losing one of those things.
AirGunner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing 777-300
Flight Schools and Training
67
12-22-2021 05:46 AM
Kirok
Major
18
10-04-2009 12:20 AM
SongMan
Military
10
08-18-2009 01:44 PM
HerkDriver
Military
56
06-19-2009 01:25 AM
ghilis101
Military
36
04-11-2008 06:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices