Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

ATAC jet down, KNFL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2012 | 02:01 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 110
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
I don't think it was a public use aircraft. ATSI is a private contractor doing gov't work. As such, I don't believe they qualify as 'public use'.
My understanding is that since it has an "N" number, and operates under the guise of the FAR's and NTSB 830, it falls on the NTSB to investigate. The only thing the Navy had to do with it was the point of origin/destination.

It was a bad situation, they got painted into a corner before anyone knew what happened, and he just happened to be flying the jet with no gas. There are a million "what if's" with this one, none of which will change anything.
Reply
Old 05-05-2012 | 03:04 AM
  #22  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
I don't think it was a public use aircraft. ATSI is a private contractor doing gov't work. As such, I don't believe they qualify as 'public use'.
Originally Posted by Grumble
My understanding is that since it has an "N" number, and operates under the guise of the FAR's and NTSB 830, it falls on the NTSB to investigate. The only thing the Navy had to do with it was the point of origin/destination.

It was a bad situation, they got painted into a corner before anyone knew what happened, and he just happened to be flying the jet with no gas. There are a million "what if's" with this one, none of which will change anything.
Huggy. Different company - ATAC -vs- ATSI, but in any case they do operate under 'public use'. The name may be misleading but it is a different set of rules.


Section 40102(a)(37) of title 49, United States Code,

is amended to read as follows:



"(37) 'public aircraft' means an aircraft operated

by or on behalf of the United States Government, a

State, the District of Columbia, a territory or

possession of the United States, or a political

subdivision of one of these governments, but only when

operated under the conditions specified by sections

40125(b) or 40125(c) of this title, or as described in

section 40125(d) of this title.".
Grumble: It is an 'N' registered aircraft, but since it operates under those rules we are mentioning above then the NTSB usually doesn't investigate. Remember the July '10 mishap? Neither the NTSB nor the military investigated that mishap for example.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 05-05-2012 | 11:53 AM
  #23  
HuggyU2's Avatar
Get me outta here...
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Default

Good to know. Thanks, USMCFLYR.
Reply
Old 05-05-2012 | 05:34 PM
  #24  
FlightGear's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Journo by night, irrigator by day
Default

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
We will remember them.
Lest We Forget.
Reply
Old 07-30-2012 | 06:43 AM
  #25  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Not really any NEW information for those that have been following this mishap, but it does make mention that the NTSB Preliminary report was released last week.

NTSB: Pilot was low on gas before Fallon crash - Navy News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Navy Times

USMCFLYR
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
HSLD
Regional
26
01-22-2008 06:48 AM
Islandhopper
Major
17
09-21-2006 07:32 AM
Islandhopper
Regional
19
09-19-2006 03:16 PM
TripleSeven
Flight Schools and Training
9
09-13-2006 04:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices