Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Two more AF jets down! >

Two more AF jets down!

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Two more AF jets down!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2012 | 03:14 AM
  #11  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERJF15
That's the second Strike this year.
At least the pilots are ok!
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 05:36 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by block30
What's going on?
If a af jet crashes, the first thing to get locked down are the forms and then the Crew Chief. If it was a MX error and the Crew Chief was at fault, that individual goes to jail. If it kills the operator, negligent homicide. Crew Dawgs job is a b!@ch.
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 05:47 AM
  #13  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by ERJF15
If a af jet crashes, the first thing to get locked down are the forms and then the Crew Chief. If it was a MX error and the Crew Chief was at fault, that individual goes to jail. If it kills the operator, negligent homicide. Crew Dawgs job is a b!@ch.
Have you seen incidents like this in the USAF?

Since most mishaps have some factor of human error whether it be the common 'pilot error' or maintenance factor, I would expect to see more than a few courts cases and at least through my years of service and involvement with safety in Naval Aviation I never once saw these types of charges brought against a pilot (remember the mishap in San Diego that killed 4 of the Korean family), and this particular mishap had some maintenance culpability too.

Recently the USCG tried to bring charges against a helo co-pilot and the charges were eventually dropped.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 06:44 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Have you seen incidents like this in the USAF?

Since most mishaps have some factor of human error whether it be the common 'pilot error' or maintenance factor, I would expect to see more than a few courts cases and at least through my years of service and involvement with safety in Naval Aviation I never once saw these types of charges brought against a pilot (remember the mishap in San Diego that killed 4 of the Korean family), and this particular mishap had some maintenance culpability too.

Recently the USCG tried to bring charges against a helo co-pilot and the charges were eventually dropped.

USMCFLYR
Yes sir, I have. One mishap in Spangdalem, a mx crew had taken over a job to reinstall the mixer assembly on the F-15. The mixer would take 1ea lateral and longitudinal input and turn it into 6 outputs. It was RARELY an area that we worked. And at the time, the mixer assm was painted 1 color, zinc blue green. Lateral rods are the same color, but long rods are white (I could have that backwards) and the mixer was one color.

Long story short, the flight controls got crossed. They missed it on their ops check. The pilot missed it on his flight control check. The crew chief launching the jet missed it. The pilot missed the cross control again at EOR.

He was number 2 in a 2 ship t/o.

Rotate, started applying lateral inputs to the stick and the jet would roll opposite. The pilot would apply the input to stop the roll, but made it worse because of the cross control. The jet ended up upside down. He was alive when first responders arrived with a portion of his head gone.

2 Crew Chief's charged with negligent homicide. One committed suicide. Charges finally dropped. This was right around the time of the blackhawk shoot down in Iraq.
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 06:47 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

I had a buddy lose a jet after a horizontal stab actuator slid out of its cylinder. He had installed the actuator, but the defect was at the depot level. They hammered him before the investigation started.
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 06:50 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

We had another jet to not rotate because the nose strut wasn't serviced properly. At 200kts, the pilot aborted the t/o. Saved the jet, but both brakes burned. They had every right to punch out. That crew chief lost some stripes.
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 07:00 AM
  #17  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by ERJF15
This was right around the time of the blackhawk shoot down in Iraq.
Ah yes...the Blackhawk shootdown.
Remember the ONLY person they went after in that debacle?
Punitive measures taken that result in CRIMINAL charges for *mistakes/errors* made in the performance of duties is a slippery slope and one that I'm glad I did not see in my career then. The Prowler mishap in Italy probably being one of the biggest examples. The NSC didn't even investigate that mishap due the 'Concept of Privilege' coming under fire IIRC.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 07:29 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

T/SGT THOMAS MUELLER

MUELLER v. U.S. DEPT. OF AIR FORCE - September 16, 1999.

Blackhawk


Court-Martial Nears in Case of Helicopters Shot Down - NYTimes.com
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 08:29 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERJF15
If a af jet crashes, the first thing to get locked down are the forms and then the Crew Chief. If it was a MX error and the Crew Chief was at fault, that individual goes to jail. If it kills the operator, negligent homicide. Crew Dawgs job is a b!@ch.
The above doesn't do much toward establishing a "just culture" - something that is generally considered the foundation of an effective safety program.

As USMC said, in the Navy the mishap investigation and the JAG investigation (the legal guys) are two very different things, and one must be careful not to "cross the streams". One attempts to find the cause of the mishap and implement steps toward prevention of future occurrence. The other, unfortunately, tries to affix individual blame and defend the service itself from any wrongdoing. The safety investigators should be viewed as the "white hat" guys. The JAG investigation...? Well, get yourself a good lawyer.

To the guy on the receiving end of either of these investigations, it's probably hard to tell the difference.
Reply
Old 05-06-2012 | 09:00 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mink
The above doesn't do much toward establishing a "just culture" - something that is generally considered the foundation of an effective safety program.

As USMC said, in the Navy the mishap investigation and the JAG investigation (the legal guys) are two very different things, and one must be careful not to "cross the streams". One attempts to find the cause of the mishap and implement steps toward prevention of future occurrence. The other, unfortunately, tries to affix individual blame and defend the service itself from any wrongdoing. The safety investigators should be viewed as the "white hat" guys. The JAG investigation...? Well, get yourself a good lawyer.

To the guy on the receiving end of either of these investigations, it's probably hard to tell the difference.
Oh I 100% agree. It's just that it's understood that you are gonna get hammered if your jet was involved in an accident. It was a guilty till proven innocent thing. As a matter of fact, the SP's would come and get you to take you to get drug tested and one of your commanders would start asking questions.

Slippery slope indeed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel payne
Fractional
1
03-11-2011 05:53 AM
jelloy683
Regional
13
08-14-2007 02:54 PM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
Lbell911
Regional
10
07-06-2007 03:17 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices