Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
For the 111 crusties >

For the 111 crusties

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

For the 111 crusties

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2012 | 06:17 AM
  #11  
HuggyU2's Avatar
Get me outta here...
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Default

I'm pretty sure the U-2 was also never given an official callsign.
"Dragon Lady" has stuck over the years, but it was from a character from the cartoon series Terry and the Pirates.
Reply
Old 11-06-2012 | 06:28 AM
  #12  
alarkyokie's Avatar
Weekends off? HA!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Default

I think we had two at SJAFB hangered of the end of the runway for Soviet bomber interdiction in the mid-70's...
Reply
Old 11-07-2012 | 04:25 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I'm unfamiliar with the E-111s KC, or do you mean the F-111E model?

USMCFLYR
Sorry for the confusion. Yes, the F-111E.
Reply
Old 11-07-2012 | 04:45 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

I do believe the 111 was officially called the Aardvark when it retired from the US inventory.

The EF-111(Raven) had similar capabilities as the EA-6, but the Raven was not capable of carrier operations and did not carry any weapon like the Prowler can.

The 111 was originally designed for the Navy for fleet defense but due to it's weight, high landing speed and side by side cockpit (among other reasons), the Navy backed out of it's development.
Reply
Old 11-07-2012 | 05:05 PM
  #15  
JethroFDX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: B767 Capt.
Default A civilian's perspective

Thank God McNamara didn't get the F-111B and the Navy got their Tomcats. The political fighting involved must have been ugly.
Reply
Old 11-07-2012 | 05:46 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

McNamara was all about the "one weapon for all services" concept. After all the different modifications to the 111 to make it work for both the AF and the Navy, they were 2 totally different planes. As a fighter, the 111 was not manueverable enough. As a low level penetration bomber, nothing could beat it. (In my opinion)
Reply
Old 11-07-2012 | 07:10 PM
  #17  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default

Originally Posted by KC135guy
McNamara was all about the "one weapon for all services" concept. After all the different modifications to the 111 to make it work for both the AF and the Navy, they were 2 totally different planes.....
The current iteration of that ill-conceived notion is called the F-35.......

Back to topic: the F-111F was the best of the bunch. It wasn't a fighter, but it was a great interdiction bomber.

Ironically, it killed more tanks in Desert Storm than the A-10...by "plinking" them with LGBs (only the 111F and Strike Eagle could do that in the USAF at the time).
Reply
Old 11-08-2012 | 01:38 PM
  #18  
JethroFDX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: B767 Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
The current iteration of that ill-conceived notion is called the F-35.......

Back to topic: the F-111F was the best of the bunch. It wasn't a fighter, but it was a great interdiction bomber.

Ironically, it killed more tanks in Desert Storm than the A-10...by "plinking" them with LGBs (only the 111F and Strike Eagle could do that in the USAF at the time).
Plus the F-111B was too dang heavy. But I could go on all day about that and then there's McNamara...

I remember seeing the 'home movies' during Destern Storm showing highlights from some of the sorties the F-111 flew.

Thanks to all of you in our military for doing the job so well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
173
07-11-2008 03:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices