![]() |
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
(Post 1334224)
I posted what I did to have a little fun. Sorry that it made folks feel the need to spin-up and re-engage.
I know Meat also,... and the first section landing he ever accomplished was with me in a T-38. I guess they didn't do them in the Tomcat,... but what do I know? |
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
(Post 1334224)
I posted what I did to have a little fun. Sorry that it made folks feel the need to spin-up and re-engage.
|
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
(Post 1333270)
So, the Navy jets got most of the kills during the Gulf War? Kosovo? And they are getting how much comparative combat time in Afghanistan?
Originally Posted by BDGERJMN
Did you really just open your fly and talk about kills in combat?? I have an idea, let's total up all the ordnance expended from USAF jets vs USN/USMC jets in OIF/OEF/Kosovo/Gulf War and then we'll talk. |
Originally Posted by satpak77
(Post 1334118)
curious, but who gets more flight time, ANG or AD ?
I would imagine that ANG with (my understanding) the role of "mostly flying" versus AD with the role of (my understanding) of "fly", "collateral duty" "leadership development" , "other BS" that the ANG guy might actually fly more. Just wondering |
Originally Posted by voodiloquist
(Post 1334239)
What's up Huggy -- yeah, we did plenty of them in the Turkey.
Did you shave that Unabomber-looking scruff off yet? Or are you going to keep it and scare the passengers?? Hope you killed enough to fill the freezer. ALCON: I retract the "you guys don't do section landings" comment. My apologies. Let's move on to the "Navy visual signals suck, and should be standardized with the rest of the aviation world" comments. |
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
(Post 1334616)
Hey, Voodoo. Pure assumption on my part, based on a limited, incomplete, and... apparently... inaccurate picture.
Did you shave that Unabomber-looking scruff off yet? Or are you going to keep it and scare the passengers?? Hope you killed enough to fill the freezer. ALCON: I retract the "you guys don't do section landings" comment. My apologies. Let's move on to the "Navy visual signals suck, and should be standardized with the rest of the aviation world" comments. |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 1334479)
I seem to fly more than my AD friends. We, still have other jobs in the sq (weapons, scheduling, Stan/eval, etc...), that take away from flying. But we have much less additional bs to waste our time (planning the Xmas party, getting your masters, exec job, etc...).
I've also never met a ANG/Reserve guy regret not being AD. However, I think the pay and retirement is better AD. |
Originally Posted by FlyFastLiveSlow
(Post 1335271)
AD USAF, there tends to be a broad range in flight times depending on how much time you spend working on your career. I hit 5,000 hours in 13 years, but there's not a lot of 5,000 hour guys around AD.
Originally Posted by FlyFastLiveSlow
(Post 1335271)
However, I think the pay and retirement is better AD.
Have you seen this little gem? Military News, benefits, careers, photos, discussions - Military Times HOME |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 1335287)
Have you seen this little gem? Military News, benefits, careers, photos, discussions - Military Times HOME |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 1335287)
Have you seen this little gem?
Military News, benefits, careers, photos, discussions - Military Times HOME Good Lord. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands