Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

OV-10 vs ISIS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2016 | 09:14 PM
  #11  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 61
Default

Thanks for all the info guys, I'd love to fly one of these.
Reply
Old 03-12-2016 | 11:27 PM
  #12  
Albief15's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 1
Default

Everyone loves the Bronco. It looks cool. Its fun to watch at airshows. Watching jumpers tumble out the back of one that does a low pass over the runway then pulls up into the vertical is fun.

Combat? Well....I think Desert Storm answered that. One squadron deployed, and had two planes lost to MANPADs. Three POWs, and 1 KIA. Yep...the plane is cheaper to operate than an A-10, but at what price? Remember the parade of bruised and beaten faces on TV during Desert Storm? That's what we will see a lot of when you put slow moving antiques into a battle against a capable threat.

I flew the OV10 for two years. Loved it, and was a bitter man when we got deployed as Ground FACS vice Air FACs to Desert Storm. The after action review indicates maybe that was a smart choice after all. The Marine Ds were more capable than our As, but were still shot down.

Had a friend who bailed out of when he lost an engine while in New Mexico. As T-38 above mentioned, the single engine ceiling is pretty much N/A. The airplane is not build to ditch, and while it is STOL that performance comes from engines pushing air over the wings. Its a miserable glider, and off airport landings were not recommended.

Would I enjoy shooting rockets with flechettes at ISIS positions? Who wouldn't? The reality, however is that canopy is plexiglass, and history has proven getting into gunfights with AAA kills attack pilots. The Air Force removed the guns from the sponsons for this very reason.

There is an aircraft well suited for a FAC-A mission. It also has a "10" in its name. The NAIL FACS also lost at least 2 in Desert Storm, but they were in position to do some pretty good damage to the bad guys. The OV-10 might be suitable, but eventually an SA-7 or -16 is going to show up and ruin someone's day. And then we'll be sending in bigger iron and trying to rescue a POW somewhere.

If someone wants to resurrect a past plane, then go find some Skyraiders. Google Bernie Fisher for a profile of a man's man....
Reply
Old 03-13-2016 | 06:17 AM
  #13  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Gees, what are you guys tell gonna me next? The Iowas aren't coming back?


So riddle me this, what makes the Super Tucano viable and the OV-10 not?
Reply
Old 03-13-2016 | 07:03 AM
  #14  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Gees, what are you guys tell gonna me next? The Iowas aren't coming back?


So riddle me this, what makes the Super Tucano viable and the OV-10 not?
They aren't in comparable threat environments.

Just came across this article:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ight-isis.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
SayAlt
Major
112
07-29-2019 08:46 AM
CGfalconHerc
Major
120
11-14-2015 03:50 PM
rickair7777
Military
10
12-27-2014 06:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices