Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Overflights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2016 | 03:25 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Ahhh, an isolationist. Good luck with that.
Uh no one is talking about isolationism
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 03:26 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Packrat
Every nation has the freedom to navigate the seas of the world outside of territorial waters. What do you think the whole Spratley Islands debate is about?
Naaw... if the Russian government had the most advanced warship in the world parked off the US coast we wouldn't think a thing about it. We definitely wouldn't consider it threatening or hostile.
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 05:34 PM
  #43  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
Every nation has the freedom to navigate the seas of the world outside of territorial waters. What do you think the whole Spratley Islands debate is about?
The one I've always enjoyed is "due regard."
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 05:57 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
Naaw... if the Russian government had the most advanced warship in the world parked off the US coast we wouldn't think a thing about it. We definitely wouldn't consider it threatening or hostile.
You obviously have no idea what the Navy is all about. Perhaps you should TRY to educate yourself before you comment on such topics.
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 06:32 PM
  #45  
HuggyU2's Avatar
Get me outta here...
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Default

Bottom line: irrespective of "whose airspace it is", the Russians do not respect us, nor our resolve to stand up to them. Not that I believe it warrants a shoot down... But Putin certainly knows how to make a statement... Especially after the Turkish embarrassment.

The two Russian pilots are yucking it up in their squadron bar and are not buying a single round. There is a gigantic 4' x 8' color glossy photo of the flyby picture plastered in their bar... in their Maintenance squadron,... in their Intel squadron.... and in the "I love me room" in the apartment that each pilot lives in.

They are laughing at us and calling us ****

I'd be doing the same thing if the role was reversed.
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 07:22 PM
  #46  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
Naaw... if the Russian government had the most advanced warship in the world parked off the US coast we wouldn't think a thing about it. We definitely wouldn't consider it threatening or hostile.

They actually do that, you just don't read about it in the media much. But we don't make aggressive simulated attacks when they visit. Not in this day and age. Fly-by look-see, perhaps.
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 07:25 PM
  #47  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BDGERJMN
What AOR are you talking about? CENTCOM? PACOM? No chance, Paddles!
Where the batpoop crazy people are. The russians you can sort of assume aren't actually going to shoot you or kamikaze...you cannot in good conscience make that assumption about certain other potential adversaries.
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 07:32 PM
  #48  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Nope, not really at all. This really isn't unexpected or unusual when you look at how our interactions have been with the Russians in recent history.

There was virtually no danger of those aircraft getting shot down by the ship. Foreign powers attempt to force overreactions from our crews all the time (aka charge the ships in an attempt to get it to shoot at them so the ship gets pulled from theater and were too ashamed politically to send a replacement). Is it annoying? Yes. Is it exciting? Yes but a lot of our training and qualifications these days goes into when to not shoot a guy, and these incidents were one of those times. Other countries do this to us all of the time because they know how restrained our reactions will be.

Makes good for CNN headlines though.
It was safer during the cold war, when everybody knew the game and the rules. More uncertainty today. The reaction is tailored to the adversary, so hopefully there's no confusion about whose airplane it is.
Reply
Old 04-14-2016 | 09:44 PM
  #49  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 51
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by jgcotter
Could have locked on with the ship's Phalanx or other defensive system, he'd see that in the cockpit, message sent, message received...
I'd be surprised if a CWIS wasn't locked on to it. I think THAT (painting inbounds) would probably be standard practice.
Reply
Old 04-15-2016 | 02:36 AM
  #50  
BDGERJMN's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Walmart Greeter
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Where the batpoop crazy people are. The russians you can sort of assume aren't actually going to shoot you or kamikaze...you cannot in good conscience make that assumption about certain other potential adversaries.
Disagree completely. We're not operating in a culture or environment to shoot down anything in that part of the world. Our ROE and risk aversion mindset will force that interaction to be one where we take the first blow, as sad as that is. FAC/FIAC is a classic example of that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
41
11-28-2007 01:28 PM
Ftrooppilot
Your Photos and Videos
63
06-16-2007 04:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices