Search

Notices
Money Talk Your hard-earned money

Government Plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009 | 08:36 AM
  #1  
Winged Wheeler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Libertarian Resistance
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: 757 FO
Default Government Plans

I don't know or understand all the nuts and bolts of the housing/financial crisis, but I understand enough of it to pose what I think is a good question.

Putting aside the issue of whether the gov't should be involved here at all (they shouldn't), look at where they've put the money. It is all in buying POS notes, injecting liquidity, and other esoterica.

What if they had used the money to buy the actual real estate? A property is in foreclosure? The gov't chartered corp would pay off the note to the bank, take title to the property, and throw the tenants out.

This would have let the air out of the financial balloon a lot slower, it would take properties off the market and preserve values for those that remain, and the taxpayers would have something to show for their investments.

If prospective buyers wanted the gov't properties they could buy them later for what ther gov't paid.

This is to simple not to have a major flaw. Tell me what the flaw is.

WW
Reply
Old 02-25-2009 | 09:12 AM
  #2  
jungle's Avatar
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Government funded and directed entities got us into this mess by forcing banks to make loans with very high risk borrowers. Further government intervention to prop up highly inflated real estate prices in the hope of helping a minority of citizens at the cost of the majority is poor practice and amounts to rewarding bad behavior, both by the citizens and by the government.
The only real solution is to let the prices continue to fall, with defaults, and write offs until a reasonable market price is reached in free markets for the assets in question.
The situation is very much the same in the stock market. Buyers are not coming into a market that is threatened with intervention, rising tax rates, government manipulation and poor management.

At this point the most useful help we could get would be a massive reduction in government spending, which would direct more capital to the private sector and a massive reduction in corporate and private taxation, which would empower the free markets to regain upward momentum.

Allowing government to spend without restraint has put every man, woman and child in this country into debt to the tune of about $400,000 dollars. We, as a country are awash in debt, and more is not going to help. There is a finite amount of capital available and we have reached or exceeded the limit.
Reply
Old 02-26-2009 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
SKYKN6's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: B777 Capt(retired)
Default

SHACK! BULLSEYE! Perfect mushoom cloud rangeing round! Sadly, I do not believe those currently running the show will follow your suggestions. P.T. Barnham comes to mind as I watch the speeches...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
2
01-25-2009 10:38 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
0
12-05-2008 08:27 PM
jungle
Money Talk
8
11-20-2008 07:41 PM
ryan1234
Money Talk
21
09-23-2008 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices