Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Money Talk
Could you live on Social Security? >

Could you live on Social Security?

Search

Notices
Money Talk Your hard-earned money

Could you live on Social Security?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2012 | 07:11 PM
  #1  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default Could you live on Social Security?

Best to think about it before you get there, way before you get there.
Many don't understand what it really means.


Could You Live On Social Security? | ZeroHedge
Reply
Old 11-15-2012 | 05:45 AM
  #2  
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 0
From: whale wrangler
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Best to think about it before you get there, way before you get there.
Many don't understand what it really means.


Could You Live On Social Security? | ZeroHedge
Unfortunately the tragedy is that many will wait till the last minute or until it's too late and this is where educating ones self on economics is of such vital importance .
Difficult times ahead await those who are not prepared .
The replies on this piece were an eye opener as to some peoples mental state.

Thanks for posting this my friend.

Ally
Reply
Old 11-16-2012 | 10:02 AM
  #3  
Adlerdriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 37
From: 767 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Best to think about it before you get there, way before you get there.
Many don't understand what it really means.


Could You Live On Social Security? | ZeroHedge
Jungle,
Do you really think there are people out there under the age of 50(probably older but I'll be conservative) who think they can live on it or are even planning on doing so? I'm not even planning that SS will be available to me by the time I reach that age - never mind whether it'll be enough.

I'm not talking about those who have life circumstances that result in being forced to to live on SS or continue work well past "normal" retirement age.

In this current age of IRAs, 401Ks, etc. there's no excuse for not planning for retirement. If you can't fund such plans, then I contend you fall into the group I mentioned above and you have no choice.

We all get a yearly SS statement that lays out the ugly truth, so there shouldn't be any surprises. The only thing the government might be able to do better is stop pretending that SS is anything other than a meager supplement to either continued employment or a real retirement plan consisting of IRAs, 401Ks and other pensions.

If someone gets to SS collection age and actually had that as their plan A, they deserve what they get (or don't get as the case may be).
Reply
Old 11-16-2012 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Jungle,
Do you really think there are people out there under the age of 50(probably older but I'll be conservative) who think they can live on it or are even planning on doing so? I'm not even planning that SS will be available to me by the time I reach that age - never mind whether it'll be enough.

I'm not talking about those who have life circumstances that result in being forced to to live on SS or continue work well past "normal" retirement age.

In this current age of IRAs, 401Ks, etc. there's no excuse for not planning for retirement. If you can't fund such plans, then I contend you fall into the group I mentioned above and you have no choice.

We all get a yearly SS statement that lays out the ugly truth, so there shouldn't be any surprises. The only thing the government might be able to do better is stop pretending that SS is anything other than a meager supplement to either continued employment or a real retirement plan consisting of IRAs, 401Ks and other pensions.

If someone gets to SS collection age and actually had that as their plan A, they deserve what they get (or don't get as the case may be).
You are quite correct, the article merely points out that a large number of people are going to have to rely on SS. It does not make any qualitative judgement on their lives or the program.

Most of us understand that if any firm tried to sell such a program in the private sector they would be jailed.
Reply
Old 11-20-2012 | 03:42 AM
  #5  
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 0
From: whale wrangler
Default

As I look into my crystal ball I foresee the inevitable cuts in payments .
I'm just saying so plan accordingly.
Reply
Old 12-08-2012 | 08:34 PM
  #6  
11Fan's Avatar
Working Class Dog
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: Spares Pusher
Default

I'm not even planning that SS will be available to me by the time I reach that age - never mind whether it'll be enough.
I'm no longer considering SS as a source of retirement income. If it is still there by the time I'm eligible, it will be a bonus.
Reply
Old 12-09-2012 | 02:50 AM
  #7  
usmc-sgt's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,077
Likes: 40
Default

If its around, it can cover my real estate taxes and maybe fun money to do dinner with the wife.

Live on it? No.
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 06:22 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Default

The graphic is a bit simplistic, for example breaking down average rents by state when average rents can vary dramatically just from one side of a town to the other.

Can you live the way you are "accustomed to" on social security alone? Certainly not. Can you *live* on social security alone? Certainly you can. Many millions of people in the US live on less. I personally know several people who live on incomes of only around $5000 per year. The program was never intended as a full pension. It is intended to keep people from starving to death on the streets.
Reply
Old 02-14-2013 | 03:00 PM
  #9  
FlyFastLiveSlow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: On the Rock
Default

Fidelity: 401(k) Balances Grew 12% to Record High in 2012

The amounts that investors have saved through their 401(k)s vary widely depending on a participant's age. Fidelity said the average year-end balances were $143,300 for participants 55 and older and not yet retired; $120,400 for baby boomers born from 1946 to 1964; $59,100 for Generation Xers born from 1965 to 1978; and $15,400 for those in Generation Y, born from 1979 to 1991.

Looks like folks are planning on frugal living from their 401k balances.
Reply
Old 02-15-2013 | 07:34 AM
  #10  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 11Fan
I'm no longer considering SS as a source of retirement income.

And it was never meant to be that way.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyinhigh
Cargo
56
02-13-2012 07:15 AM
Sniper
Major
3
02-09-2012 08:54 PM
hesitant
Foreign
5
01-15-2012 04:23 AM
Priority 3
Cargo
88
05-04-2010 02:57 PM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
0
12-30-2008 12:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices