Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
A Look Inside Baker Aviation >

A Look Inside Baker Aviation

Search

Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

A Look Inside Baker Aviation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2025 | 05:52 PM
  #11  
Dubh's Avatar
Not home.
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 239
Likes: 4
From: Captain
Default

Y'all are based in Fort Worth, correct?
Why isn't DAL or DFW a domicile?

Asking out of all.due.respect (it's in the Geneva Convention).
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 09:06 AM
  #12  
zippinbye's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 20
From: WB Cpt
Default On the Other Hand .....

Originally Posted by Danny188
Odd that there has to be so many threads about how great a place is.
Obviously a subjective measure on your part - not that there's anything wrong with that. I'm sure there are lots of good 135 outfits that rarely see favorable comments online. And plenty that suck that don't experience negative public comments, and all those in between. These threads seem to simply be a genuine willingness to share, from an insider who likes his job and thinks others might enjoy working there too.

The Baker-related posts have been enough to intrigue me, as a future 121 evacuee. While most of my consideration has been for 91 and 91k, I thought a "good" 135 operation might be worth a look. A local 135 operator that flies a really cool fleet of jets (15 minutes from my house) has expressed clear disdain for ex-121 pilots. Even though my career started in their hangar with a now-defunct 135, these guys won't give me the time of day. There are plenty of other options to pursue over the next couple of years.

Baker caught my eye based on the "too frequent" posts you describe. There might be something to it, if a deeply-vested pilot is not just singing praises, but taking the time to shed light on the minutiae of the operation. The author, Chase/Roy, who is the D.O, was kind enough to have a lengthy phone chat with me during one of his layovers. Suffice it to say he was pleasant and professional, and painted a thorough picture of a day-in-the-life as a Baker pilot. Not all roses and rainbows, but a realistic view of a job that may not be for everyone. Good enough for me to explore further.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 09:21 AM
  #13  
Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Likes: 89
From: Airline Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye
Obviously a subjective measure on your part - not that there's anything wrong with that. I'm sure there are lots of good 135 outfits that rarely see favorable comments online. And plenty that suck that don't experience negative public comments, and all those in between. These threads seem to simply be a genuine willingness to share, from an insider who likes his job and thinks others might enjoy working there too.

The Baker-related posts have been enough to intrigue me, as a future 121 evacuee. While most of my consideration has been for 91 and 91k, I thought a "good" 135 operation might be worth a look. A local 135 operator that flies a really cool fleet of jets (15 minutes from my house) has expressed clear disdain for ex-121 pilots. Even though my career started in their hangar with a now-defunct 135, these guys won't give me the time of day. There are plenty of other options to pursue over the next couple of years.

Baker caught my eye based on the "too frequent" posts you describe. There might be something to it, if a deeply-vested pilot is not just singing praises, but taking the time to shed light on the minutiae of the operation. The author, Chase/Roy, who is the D.O, was kind enough to have a lengthy phone chat with me during one of his layovers. Suffice it to say he was pleasant and professional, and painted a thorough picture of a day-in-the-life as a Baker pilot. Not all roses and rainbows, but a realistic view of a job that may not be for everyone. Good enough for me to explore further.
Going from a 121 type operation to flying 800 hours a year at a 135 is going to kill you, especially at 65+. Doing 500 hours a year of retail 135 was enough to give me second thoughts on an aviation career, doing 800+ at an airline is a cake walk.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 10:16 AM
  #14  
biigD's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 110
Default

I think there's a certain kind of pilot that fits well with a shop like Baker, and I commend chase for taking the time to discuss the specifics of the job - especially on a board filled with lazy 121 heathens such as myself.

My time at a 135 was a ton of fun. I didn't even mind the 'work' - there's a sense of accomplishment that comes from being such a vital part of the client's experience. I'm just at a point in my life where being gone even 4 days is more than I like.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 02:41 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 31
Likes: 51
From: Macbook Pro Typer
Default

Originally Posted by HwkrPlt
Going from a 121 type operation to flying 800 hours a year at a 135 is going to kill you, especially at 65+. Doing 500 hours a year of retail 135 was enough to give me second thoughts on an aviation career, doing 800+ at an airline is a cake walk.
Seems like high volume 135 isnt for you. Its not for a lot of folks. But for some (150 or so) its perfect. We understand that. We post on FB and other places and clearly state that its a tough job sometimes but for 135 its got the pay and tempo that some guys desire. We have lots of former 121 guys. We have also hired a few 121 guys that realized it wasn't for them. They didn't come **** all over our posts because it was a hard job, they just said thanks and we helped them along the way. So its one of these things where lots of people wont be a good fit. Chase is out here talking to the people who will be a good fit because inside Baker thats all that matters. The rest is outside noise.

We appreciate your opinions on 135 for 121 guys but we are still hiring 121 guys an they are still thriving at Baker.

Thanks!
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 02:54 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Baker Aviation Citation X
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Citation X
Default

Originally Posted by Dubh
Y'all are based in Fort Worth, correct?
Why isn't DAL or DFW a domicile?

Asking out of all.due.respect (it's in the Geneva Convention).
Dubh,

Baker, like a lot of 135 operators used a concept of a “floating fleet”. There are no pilot bases as each pilot starts and ends his work week by getting on a commercial flight to/from his home of record, in my case SAT.

A schedule comes out (3 lines 3.5 yrs ago, now 22 lines…44 pilots) are all tracking to or from from wherever the planes are parked and the “crew swap” occurs.

We have two large mx facilities in FTW and BUY but planes only pass theough there for the regularly schedule mx checks or when a serious issue occurs requiring a ferry flight there.

With deployed mx experts in TEB, OPF, VNY, little things get taken care of before they become big things.

Pilots contribute to the high utilization by taking 17 pics each day of all tires, oxygen/fluid levels, accumulator pressures, O2 levels, tires and brake pads. This gives the DOM a first hand look at how the planes are holding up and if mx needs to be schedule.

BTW, gave up the DO position 18 months ago We made a massive improvement with my replacement!! Just a line swine now and enjoying it
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 04:44 PM
  #17  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 31
Likes: 51
From: Macbook Pro Typer
Default

Quote of the year.

"the health insurance is so expensive its cheaper to just pay out my training agreement and go to Baker"

Actual words of a pilot during an interview today.

Baker Aviation pays 100% of employee healthcare premiums.

Baker Aviation does not have training agreements. Why would you keep someone around that doesn't want to be there?

Baker Aviation is hiring Citation X and Challenger 300 pilots.
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 06:04 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,390
Likes: 112
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by zippinbye

The Baker-related posts have been enough to intrigue me, as a future 121 evacuee. While most of my consideration has been for 91 and 91k, I thought a "good" 135 operation might be worth a look. A local 135 operator that flies a really cool fleet of jets (15 minutes from my house) has expressed clear disdain for ex-121 pilots. Even though my career started in their hangar with a now-defunct 135, these guys won't give me the time of day. There are plenty of other options to pursue over the next couple of years.

Baker caught my eye based on the "too frequent" posts you describe. There might be something to it, if a deeply-vested pilot is not just singing praises, but taking the time to shed light on the minutiae of the operation. The author, Chase/Roy, who is the D.O, was kind enough to have a lengthy phone chat with me during one of his layovers. Suffice it to say he was pleasant and professional, and painted a thorough picture of a day-in-the-life as a Baker pilot. Not all roses and rainbows, but a realistic view of a job that may not be for everyone. Good enough for me to explore further.
Long time 121 guy, 2+ yrs corporate beforehand, 2 yrs Part 135 afterwards. Part 135 ops is a lot different than being a 121 Captain. Some 121 guys switch and do fine, a fair amount don't. That's why some companies are very leery of ex-121 guys. Doing paperwork (planning) in the hotel at night and take a break to call the big boss (wife) - "what are you doing?" "Paperwork. Just finished a bunch, have about another 1 hour go." "You never did this at the airline." True. More paperwork in an 8 day cycle vs several months worth of flying at the airline. Typically lost a couple of pounds every 8 day duty cycle because you're busy and '3 squares a day' is a pipe dream. #1 priority is keeping the operation moving, prepared, and solving the problems of the moment/day. 121 and the plane breaks? Hard break for a couple of days? You're done. Part 135? Bad jet? You own it until relieved. Turned out to be a 3 day AOG.* Three day trip extension on a 121 trip? "We're are we going?" Tried to squeeze a round of golf in on a Part 135 AOG....and couldn't make it work. Too many juggling balls to allow me to check out for 4 hours.** The plane is your baby, you own it, hook, line and sinker, when you're in charge. There is no hand off. Contract mx shows up? It's still your jet, you are the eyes and ears of your supervisors until relieved by another company representative.

* - FO felt a slight notch in the flight control check - "hey, feel this." Subtle...but there. Got noticeably worse in a couple of flight control checks. Hmmm. Bad bearings. Very good catch by the low time FO.
** - FO got sick. ER visit, food/fluid runs, etc.
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 05:01 PM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chase
Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Yes the webmaster used X+ numbers.

In the process of deleting all references to Garmin, correcting the ranges listed on the website and other cosmetic changes.

If you see anything else that doesn't seem right pls let me know.
what are your sic mins?
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 05:47 PM
  #20  
Dubh's Avatar
Not home.
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 239
Likes: 4
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by chase
Dubh,

Baker, like a lot of 135 operators used a concept of a “floating fleet”. There are no pilot bases as each pilot starts and ends his work week by getting on a commercial flight to/from his home of record, in my case SAT.

A schedule comes out (3 lines 3.5 yrs ago, now 22 lines…44 pilots) are all tracking to or from from wherever the planes are parked and the “crew swap” occurs.

We have two large mx facilities in FTW and BUY but planes only pass theough there for the regularly schedule mx checks or when a serious issue occurs requiring a ferry flight there.

With deployed mx experts in TEB, OPF, VNY, little things get taken care of before they become big things.

Pilots contribute to the high utilization by taking 17 pics each day of all tires, oxygen/fluid levels, accumulator pressures, O2 levels, tires and brake pads. This gives the DOM a first hand look at how the planes are holding up and if mx needs to be schedule.

BTW, gave up the DO position 18 months ago We made a massive improvement with my replacement!! Just a line swine now and enjoying it
We both have the deep.emotional.scars of being ex-Vista, so I completely understand the floating fleet concept.
I saw “domicile” mentioned upthread, thought something may have changed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
choppersafety
Flight Schools and Training
8
03-26-2017 09:06 AM
Fetzervalve
Part 135
43
02-04-2016 09:46 AM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
NTT5418
Flight Schools and Training
31
11-20-2011 03:30 PM
zyttocs
Corporate
8
09-30-2011 12:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices