Lasik/PRK and the airlines
#1
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
I currently fly for the Air Force and am seriously considering doing the Lasik/PRK they offer. Before I take the leap of faith I want to make sure I'm not closing doors on myself.
Though I don't know of anyone who has had issues cotinuing their Air Force flying career post-surgery, does corrective eye surgery preclude you from flying for the airlines, especially as a new hire? Specifically, are there regulations that create medical hassles (waivers or required additional testing)? Would any airline care (or even ask) if you've had corrective eye surgery?
In other words, am I screwing myself if I choose to ditch the glasses that are doing a mighty fine job of correcting my vision to 20/10 but are a pain in my a$$?
Though I don't know of anyone who has had issues cotinuing their Air Force flying career post-surgery, does corrective eye surgery preclude you from flying for the airlines, especially as a new hire? Specifically, are there regulations that create medical hassles (waivers or required additional testing)? Would any airline care (or even ask) if you've had corrective eye surgery?
In other words, am I screwing myself if I choose to ditch the glasses that are doing a mighty fine job of correcting my vision to 20/10 but are a pain in my a$$?
#3
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
I've know a few who had it done and a couple of years later required glasses again to correct their near-sightedness.
In other instances they can't always achieve 20/20 or better. Some folks end up with vision slightly worse than 20/20.
By the way, not sure if others know this but here's what 20/20 indicates.
Let's say your vision is 20/300.
What a person with normal eye sight (20/20) sees clearly at 300 feet, you see clearly at 20 feet. In other words, the clarity you have at 20 feet will be the same clarity a person with 20/20 vision has at 300 feet.
In other instances they can't always achieve 20/20 or better. Some folks end up with vision slightly worse than 20/20.
By the way, not sure if others know this but here's what 20/20 indicates.
Let's say your vision is 20/300.
What a person with normal eye sight (20/20) sees clearly at 300 feet, you see clearly at 20 feet. In other words, the clarity you have at 20 feet will be the same clarity a person with 20/20 vision has at 300 feet.
#4
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,847
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
If you are a professional pilot and can pass an FAA first class medical, you should think carefully before getting vision surgery.
Do they offer LASIK or PRK? LASIK is better in many ways, but the military has historically prefered PRK since it doesn't penetrate the structure of the cornea.
There is always a smal risk of complications.
Another concern is your Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA). I'm about 20/100 without glasses, but I correct to 20/15 with glasses. Laser surgery can improve your uncorrected acuity by reshaping the cornea while at the same time damaging the cornea and reducing your BCVA. Someone like me might go from:
20/100 (uncorrected) and 20/15 (corrected) to
20/25 uncorrected and 20/20 corrected.
So I end up with MUCH better vision without glasses, but even with glasses I can only see 20/20, so I've lost 5 points on the eye chart. This is actually pretty common, and is not likely to ever be correctable. It is also possible to lose enough BCVA to end up worse than 20/20, like say 20/25. This would make you ineligible for an FAA first class medical without a waiver.
Anyone who knows anything about laser eye surgery will STRONGLY recomend a VERY experienced surgeon...the military doc is likely to be somewhat junior, and it's military medicine. I've found they are very good at some things (like orthopedic surgery) but not so great at other things.
There is also a new procedure, a version of LASIK, which instead of just carving your cornea into a perfect geometric shape uses a laser to measure the optical imperfections INSIDE your eyeball. Then it cuts your cornea to the right general shape AND adds intentional deviations to the cornea to cancel out the inner-eye imperfections. This procedure can actually give you a serious INCREASE in BCVA by correcting those inner-eyeball errors which were previously not correctable. 20/10 uncorrected would not be uncommon. This is the procedure that I would be looking into for myself...hopefully the military has the new equipment.
Do they offer LASIK or PRK? LASIK is better in many ways, but the military has historically prefered PRK since it doesn't penetrate the structure of the cornea.
There is always a smal risk of complications.
Another concern is your Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA). I'm about 20/100 without glasses, but I correct to 20/15 with glasses. Laser surgery can improve your uncorrected acuity by reshaping the cornea while at the same time damaging the cornea and reducing your BCVA. Someone like me might go from:
20/100 (uncorrected) and 20/15 (corrected) to
20/25 uncorrected and 20/20 corrected.
So I end up with MUCH better vision without glasses, but even with glasses I can only see 20/20, so I've lost 5 points on the eye chart. This is actually pretty common, and is not likely to ever be correctable. It is also possible to lose enough BCVA to end up worse than 20/20, like say 20/25. This would make you ineligible for an FAA first class medical without a waiver.
Anyone who knows anything about laser eye surgery will STRONGLY recomend a VERY experienced surgeon...the military doc is likely to be somewhat junior, and it's military medicine. I've found they are very good at some things (like orthopedic surgery) but not so great at other things.
There is also a new procedure, a version of LASIK, which instead of just carving your cornea into a perfect geometric shape uses a laser to measure the optical imperfections INSIDE your eyeball. Then it cuts your cornea to the right general shape AND adds intentional deviations to the cornea to cancel out the inner-eye imperfections. This procedure can actually give you a serious INCREASE in BCVA by correcting those inner-eyeball errors which were previously not correctable. 20/10 uncorrected would not be uncommon. This is the procedure that I would be looking into for myself...hopefully the military has the new equipment.
#6
Rick makes a lot of good points. As a matter of fact, it sounds a lot like the brief the eye sugeon will give you if you choose to enter the program. I had mine done in San Diego by a Navy CAPT who is one of the most experienced around. Do your homework, they will give you a ton of info while you are going through the screening process and you have ample oppertunity to bail out if you change your mind. I went from 20/400 to 20/16 with no complications so it was nothing less than a life changing event for me, but since you are already flying now, YMMV.
#7
If you are a professional pilot and can pass an FAA first class medical, you should think carefully before getting vision surgery.
Do they offer LASIK or PRK? LASIK is better in many ways, but the military has historically prefered PRK since it doesn't penetrate the structure of the cornea.
There is always a smal risk of complications.
Another concern is your Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA). I'm about 20/100 without glasses, but I correct to 20/15 with glasses. Laser surgery can improve your uncorrected acuity by reshaping the cornea while at the same time damaging the cornea and reducing your BCVA. Someone like me might go from:
20/100 (uncorrected) and 20/15 (corrected) to
20/25 uncorrected and 20/20 corrected.
So I end up with MUCH better vision without glasses, but even with glasses I can only see 20/20, so I've lost 5 points on the eye chart. This is actually pretty common, and is not likely to ever be correctable. It is also possible to lose enough BCVA to end up worse than 20/20, like say 20/25. This would make you ineligible for an FAA first class medical without a waiver.
Anyone who knows anything about laser eye surgery will STRONGLY recomend a VERY experienced surgeon...the military doc is likely to be somewhat junior, and it's military medicine. I've found they are very good at some things (like orthopedic surgery) but not so great at other things.
There is also a new procedure, a version of LASIK, which instead of just carving your cornea into a perfect geometric shape uses a laser to measure the optical imperfections INSIDE your eyeball. Then it cuts your cornea to the right general shape AND adds intentional deviations to the cornea to cancel out the inner-eye imperfections. This procedure can actually give you a serious INCREASE in BCVA by correcting those inner-eyeball errors which were previously not correctable. 20/10 uncorrected would not be uncommon. This is the procedure that I would be looking into for myself...hopefully the military has the new equipment.
Do they offer LASIK or PRK? LASIK is better in many ways, but the military has historically prefered PRK since it doesn't penetrate the structure of the cornea.
There is always a smal risk of complications.
Another concern is your Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA). I'm about 20/100 without glasses, but I correct to 20/15 with glasses. Laser surgery can improve your uncorrected acuity by reshaping the cornea while at the same time damaging the cornea and reducing your BCVA. Someone like me might go from:
20/100 (uncorrected) and 20/15 (corrected) to
20/25 uncorrected and 20/20 corrected.
So I end up with MUCH better vision without glasses, but even with glasses I can only see 20/20, so I've lost 5 points on the eye chart. This is actually pretty common, and is not likely to ever be correctable. It is also possible to lose enough BCVA to end up worse than 20/20, like say 20/25. This would make you ineligible for an FAA first class medical without a waiver.
Anyone who knows anything about laser eye surgery will STRONGLY recomend a VERY experienced surgeon...the military doc is likely to be somewhat junior, and it's military medicine. I've found they are very good at some things (like orthopedic surgery) but not so great at other things.
There is also a new procedure, a version of LASIK, which instead of just carving your cornea into a perfect geometric shape uses a laser to measure the optical imperfections INSIDE your eyeball. Then it cuts your cornea to the right general shape AND adds intentional deviations to the cornea to cancel out the inner-eye imperfections. This procedure can actually give you a serious INCREASE in BCVA by correcting those inner-eyeball errors which were previously not correctable. 20/10 uncorrected would not be uncommon. This is the procedure that I would be looking into for myself...hopefully the military has the new equipment.
I've had friends who opted for LASIK obtain vastly different results. Some are very satisfied but one can no longer hold a 1st class due to night vision problems that he developed post surgery. If you're a military pilot your uncorrected vision can't be that bad to start with right? If you have good vision with glasses, I wouldn't take the risk associated with surgery no matter how small. It's kind of like playing russian roulette with your career in my book...
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
To answer your question, and not give you the cautionary side, I had Lasik a while back. Have interviewed at a number of airlines, and offered a job at all. It was never an issue, they could care less. They only care if you can pass a first class medical.
#9
Not true. That may be the case with many US airlines but there are certainly some foreign airlines / aviation authorities that will unfortunately not consider you if you have had LASIK, PRK, etc.
#10
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,847
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
The problem is the risk of LONG TERM complications...if your vision degrades over time you might need further surgery, or might not be able to pass an FAA medical (without a waiver).
I know plenty of folks who have had good luck with the surgery, but I don't know anyone who has gone 30 years post-surgery without complications...and neither does anyone else! There's no long term history on the new stuff, you're the guinea pig!
As a professional pilot (and military guy) I won't do it (maybe when I retire?). If I was employed in a regular job, I probably would.
If you NEED the surgery to qualify for military flying, that is your ultimate dream, and you are otherwise competetive... then consider it. I probably would have back in the day, in those circumstances.
If you're a civilian and can pass the medical now, think twice before slicing up your eyes.


