PSA or Republic (PHL Desired)
I keep hearing about junior manning and how the flow isn't worth much if you have a 4 yr degree and a good resume... Being a CFI working 6 to 7 days per week 14 plus hours a day (making **** poor money), I'm ready for a better QOL. What are your opinions on Republic vs PSA for a phl base? What about long term career outlook? Any insight would be much appreciated.. mid 30s with a mortgage if that changes anything strategy wise.. thanks in advance.
|
As of right now PHL is small and also fairly senior at PSA. That may not always be the case, but I’ve yet to hear of any plans for major growth there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I am not sure what PHL is like for Republic, but it’s a small base for us and senior at the Captain side. In regards to flow, a lot of folks who don’t have the flow will always try to say. However, I think of the flow as a insurance card/sure thing to AA in my back pocket while trying to get hired on off the street to the Majors. Think of it as playing house money.
|
How likely is it to get PHL out of training as a new hire?
|
At present very likely. PHL for PSA has its downsides but if you live close they’re all tolerable.
|
PHL just went to four new hires in the most recent bid.
|
Phl is really senior at PSA
Expect like 18 months on reserve at least with not the best reserve rules |
Originally Posted by mike sierra
(Post 2821786)
Phl is really senior at PSA
Expect like 18 months on reserve at least with not the best reserve rules |
Originally Posted by mike sierra
(Post 2821786)
Phl is really senior at PSA
Expect like 18 months on reserve at least with not the best reserve rules Yes, psa has short call reserve lines (about 90% of reserves) sit hot at the airport from time to time, maybe 20% of days |
Originally Posted by ClearPr0p
(Post 2821839)
PSA does ready reserve?
|
Originally Posted by ClearPr0p
(Post 2821839)
PSA does ready reserve?
|
Originally Posted by stillcantfly
(Post 2822033)
Ohhhhhhh man do you ever! Not only do you get a type rating in the CL-65, but wait for it....... The lazy boy 8.0!! As you’ll be spending 8.0 hours a day sitting in your monkey suit doing nothing.....
|
Originally Posted by Stratapilot
(Post 2822041)
Except if you’re a Captain. You’ll be flying a 4 day and 2 more days after that within 7 mins of butt in recliner with an extension to the max duty day on the last day, and you’ll ******* LIKE IT! Happens to me every time. The last time I was released early enough to catch a flight home the same day my wife actually cried.
|
Originally Posted by captande
(Post 2822059)
Especially if you end up based in CLT or DCA. They just agreed to increase the amount of HRV crews to sit. Double the fun!
|
Piedmont for a PHL base.
|
Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
(Post 2823056)
Piedmont for a PHL base.
|
Originally Posted by ClearPr0p
(Post 2823068)
I keep reading about terrible QOL and no solutions on the horizon for pdt... Is it true that not being on base is still better than being on base with PDT?
|
Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
(Post 2823056)
Piedmont for a PHL base.
|
Originally Posted by stillcantfly
(Post 2822033)
Ohhhhhhh man do you ever! Not only do you get a type rating in the CL-65, but wait for it....... The lazy boy 8.0!! As you’ll be spending 8.0 hours a day sitting in your monkey suit doing nothing.....
Originally Posted by Urban achiever
(Post 2823104)
Yeah I don’t know anyone who is happy with their decision to be a piedmonster.
|
Originally Posted by ClearPr0p
(Post 2823068)
I keep reading about terrible QOL and no solutions on the horizon for pdt... Is it true that not being on base is still better than being on base with PDT?
|
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823190)
Lazy Boy? You must be one of those spoiled CLT reserves. The outstations are lucky to have furniture just barely superior to lawn chairs.
Their flow rate, as a percentage of the pilot group (which is what matters) has long been higher than PSA's, so there is that. If flow is the goal, Piedmont has been the better choice for several years. A Piedmont Line holder vs a PSA line holder even prior to the PSA pay raise had to work an extra 3 months worth of days per year to come close to match PSA credit. Over a 10 year period waiting to flow, a Piedmont pilot will be at work an extra 900 days compared to a PSA pilot, for less credit. |
Originally Posted by Phoenix21
(Post 2823225)
Not lately. Piedmont’s flow is just under 10 years for new hires.
A Piedmont Line holder vs a PSA line holder even prior to the PSA pay raise had to work an extra 3 months worth of days per year to come close to match PSA credit. Over a 10 year period waiting to flow, a Piedmont pilot will be at work an extra 900 days compared to a PSA pilot, for less credit. How many pilots are on Piedmont's seniority list? PSA is flowing just ten a month. PSA has 1,900 pilots on the seniority list. Let's see the numbers over at Piedmont. |
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823252)
How many is Piedmont flowing a month?
How many pilots are on Piedmont's seniority list? PSA is flowing just ten a month. PSA has 1,900 pilots on the seniority list. Let's see the numbers over at Piedmont. 744 on the seniority list currently (fluxes between 740-760ish). |
Thanks.
Piedmont is flowing a maximum 9.68% of the seniority list annually. PSA is flowing a maximum 6.32%. Piedmont is flowing at a 53% greater rate than PSA is. |
Would you rather be in jail with an 8 year flow to American or in a staffed carribean villa with a 10 year flow.
There’s more to the choice than single point in time flow measurements |
Obviously there are many factors to consider. That doesn't mean one shouldn't counter misinformation...intentional or not. If flow is the priority, PSA's is inferior to Piedmont for a new hire. That is simple math. Would you rather be on the bottom of a seniority list with 6% of those senior to you leaving via flow every year, or on the bottom of a seniority list with 50% more leaving via flow every year?
It's a data point to add to the decision process. |
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823386)
Obviously there are many factors to consider. That doesn't mean one shouldn't counter misinformation...intentional or not. If flow is the priority, PSA's is inferior to Piedmont for a new hire. That is simple math. Would you rather be on the bottom of a seniority list with 6% of those senior to you leaving via flow every year, or on the bottom of a seniority list with 50% more leaving via flow every year?
It's a data point to add to the decision process. PHL won't grow at PSA and might even shrink....while probably will always be there for Piedmont. Another point is that piedmont lines might be bad...but he will be stuck for a long time in reserve anyway, so no big changes here...moreover he will not be able to hold captain LCR or better in PHL for a long time |
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823329)
Thanks.
Piedmont is flowing a maximum 9.68% of the seniority list annually. PSA is flowing a maximum 6.32%. Piedmont is flowing at a 53% greater rate than PSA is. Even when Piedmont gets its pay raise, it will still be hampered by 16hr. 4 day Lines strung together for 75hr credit lines with 11 days off. 11 days off (mostly 2 days with an occasional 3 or 4 day stretch thrown in) for 10 years... the OP said they’re looking for QOL. Piedmont is the last airline to come to in Philly or CLT if quality of life is even remotely part of the consideration. |
The difference isn’t 3.3%. It’s 53%.
|
Republic here if you're actually curious about what's going on here...PHL has been up and down over the last year. They suddenly had a few vacancies that let a bunch of junior FO's in, but I imagine that door has closed by now. Junior lineholder FO for June is 6/25/18 hire. However, PHL is small for us. Only 31 full lines. There's always movement, though...PHL on the CA side doesn't move at all, so FO's will end up taking upgrades in other bases. Junior upgrade is under 2 years now.
|
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823572)
The difference isn’t 3.3%. It’s 53%.
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2823655)
Truth somewhere in between. Outside attrition is what really drives time to flow
Regarding outside attrition, both carriers will likely experience roughly the same percentage of outside attrition, so that factor cancels out. A ten year flow at PDT isn’t realistic, because it doesn’t account for outside attrition. Likewise, a 16-year flow at PSA isn’t realistic, for the same reason. If half of PSA’s pilots leave outside the flow, that leaves 950/120 per year = 7.92 years for number 1,900 to flow. If half of PDT’s pilots flow, that leaves 372/72 per year = 5.17 years for number 744 to flow. That’s nearly three years’ difference. That’s what a 53% higher flow rate (considering pilot group size) does for PDT. A new hire who chooses PDT over PSA, and who flows, is likely to spend nearly three more years at AA...three more years at $250k-$300k/year. This assumes no change in flow rates from present. PDT’s flow is presently superior to PSA’s, and has been for a few years. Again, there are a lot of other factors to consider, but an extra $15k-$20k/year during one’s time at the regionals is nothing compared to an extra $250k/year at AA. |
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823679)
There is no “in between”. 9 is 50% greater than 6. Flow alone is roughly 53% higher at Piedmont. It’s fourth-grade math.
Regarding outside attrition, both carriers will likely experience roughly the same percentage of outside attrition, so that factor cancels out. A ten year flow at PDT isn’t realistic, because it doesn’t account for outside attrition. Likewise, a 16-year flow at PSA isn’t realistic, for the same reason. If half of PSA’s pilots leave outside the flow, that leaves 950/120 per year = 7.92 years for number 1,900 to flow. If half of PDT’s pilots flow, that leaves 372/72 per year = 5.17 years for number 744 to flow. That’s nearly three years’ difference. That’s what a 53% higher flow rate (considering pilot group size) does for PDT. A new hire who chooses PDT over PSA, and who flows, is likely to spend nearly three more years at AA...three more years at $250k-$300k/year. This assumes no change in flow rates from present. PDT’s flow is presently superior to PSA’s, and has been for a few years. Again, there are a lot of other factors to consider, but an extra $15k-$20k/year during one’s time at the regionals is nothing compared to an extra $250k/year at AA. The five year flow at Piedmont Does not exist for new hires. Do not come to Piedmont for a Philly area base unless you can’t get hired on at the following airlines: Frontier PSA Republic Each of the above will give better pay, scheduling and QOL. A 10 year flow is not worth coming to Piedmont. |
I see. So PDT is a horrible place to work, and no one should go there, but no one at PDT wants to leave for better opportunities. It’s crystal clear to me now.
|
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823715)
I see. So PDT is a horrible place to work, and no one should go there, but no one at PDT wants to leave for better opportunities. It’s crystal clear to me now.
When the flow was introduced PDT had less than 400 pilots and was going to take 5 years for new hires. Every 50-60 people since then has added a year to the flow. For a time Piedmont was supposed to get 175s, then instead 100+ 140/5s, which would have supported growth of he pilot group to increase flow. Those things didn’t materialize and aircraft completed at 60 and management has announced they intend to keep the pilot group its current 740-760 range. |
Yes the % of pilots flowed per year is simple arithmetic. The statistic produced isn’t particularly meaningful though.
If 20% of a seniority list leaves every year then the time to flow numbers are 26% vs 29%. If it’s 10% then it’s 16 vs 19. Very much makes a difference in how long hire to flow takes |
Originally Posted by Phoenix21
(Post 2823726)
Piedmont is like a jam in traffic. At the front of the line the end is in sight so even though it’s slow moving it’s not too bad. In the middle the line is long and barely moving but there aren’t many options to get out and go another way. Towards the back end folks see how long the line is and how it’s barely moving and take alternate route as soon as they can.
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2823736)
Yes the % of pilots flowed per year is simple arithmetic. The statistic produced isn’t particularly meaningful though.
If 20% of a seniority list leaves every year then the time to flow numbers are 26% vs 29%. If it’s 10% then it’s 16 vs 19. Very much makes a difference in how long hire to flow takes You guys can carry on without further input from me. I’ve made enough effort trying to explain why 9% is 50% more than 6%, and how it matters. It’s not my job to change your personal reality. |
Originally Posted by irrelevant
(Post 2823765)
This is no different than the scenario at PSA, or Envoy.
I suspect you are relatively junior. Perhaps once you get in the top 300 or so on the seniority list, once outside attrition dries up, you’ll understand why a flow rate 50% lower than PDT’s makes a big difference. 20% of the top 300 are not leaving outside of the flow, and once you get within the top 200, there is nearly zero outside attrition. I imagine you believe you’re going to get the call from Delta as soon as you hit 1,000 hours P.I.C. - I sincerely hope you do. You guys can carry on without further input from me. I’ve made enough effort trying to explain why 9% is 50% more than 6%, and how it matters. It’s not my job to change your personal reality. |
Originally Posted by Urban achiever
(Post 2823104)
Yeah I don’t know anyone who is happy with their decision to be a piedmonster.
|
Originally Posted by ClearPr0p
(Post 2824153)
"Piedmonster" LOL
SkyWorst Brown Streak Mesa etc... |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands