![]() |
Eagle and PSA merged?
I'll be the first to say this is of course strictly rumor, no real source but....
With the USA/AA merger most likely being announced on Tuesday. Lets toss around the idea of the new company deciding to merge PSA and Eagle. Eagle is obviously short staffed and not finding enough pilots to cover its want of 500 pilots this year. It just so happens that PSA has just over 500 pilots. I don't see any furloughs being needed at all. With people flowing to the new AA (either by the all ready in place flow agreements or a new one) they could even continue with the plan of parking 50 seat jets without the need to furlough anyone. This may sound crazy but i feel like there has to be at lest one merger between the wholly owned regionals of the soon to be new AA. |
who knows... but just because PSA has 500 pilots doesn't mean anything. PSA has 500 pilots cause it needs 500 pilots to do it's flying. If AE were to just scoop up all the flightcrews at PSA who will do their flying?
|
But if Eagle hires furloughed pilots, they can hire them at first year pay.
|
Well flying on both sides would likely shrink some with the ERJ's and CRJ-200's being parked.
|
that "beautiful idea" (yes veryyyy sarcastic mode ) is why the airline industry is how it is right now! .....
|
sad part is it will most likely happen
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1347756)
Well flying on both sides would likely shrink some with the ERJ's and CRJ-200's being parked.
Who knows but Airways owns 200s leases until 2019..... Don't see bombardier really wanting more 200s back and allowing them out on leases..... |
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 1347781)
Who knows but Airways owns 200s leases until 2019..... Don't see bombardier really wanting more 200s back and allowing them out on leases.....
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1347784)
unless they make a deal to trade 200's for 7/900's.
|
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 1347781)
Who knows but Airways owns 200s leases until 2019..... Don't see bombardier really wanting more 200s back and allowing them out on leases.....
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1347784)
unless they make a deal to trade 200's for 7/900's.
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 1347789)
Tell that to every pinnacle pilot who said the exact same thing bout delta owning the lease on 140 200s....
|
I want a CLT base
|
honestly this could be best for all involved.
|
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 1347831)
Beautiful.... Many at PSA would prefer that.... Especially once 1000 leave AE.... Ha
|
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1347876)
1000 leaving eagle? Really?
|
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 1347893)
Isn't that the known?
|
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1347876)
1000 leaving eagle? Really?
Beyond those obstacles, it could 2 years beyond that to actually truly merge the two carriers. |
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 1347833)
Pinnacle=Bankrupt..... USairways/PSA=not.... Kind of a big difference.
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 1347927)
I must have missed the part where daddy delta was bankrupt who owns the leases. Not pinnacle. Kind of a big difference.
Pinnacle being bankrupt certainly does help in this quest though..... Don't think for a second it doesn't...... |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1347751)
I'll be the first to say this is of course strictly rumor, no real source but....
With the USA/AA merger most likely being announced on Tuesday. Lets toss around the idea of the new company deciding to merge PSA and Eagle. Eagle is obviously short staffed and not finding enough pilots to cover its want of 500 pilots this year. It just so happens that PSA has just over 500 pilots. I don't see any furloughs being needed at all. With people flowing to the new AA (either by the all ready in place flow agreements or a new one) they could even continue with the plan of parking 50 seat jets without the need to furlough anyone. This may sound crazy but i feel like there has to be at lest one merger between the wholly owned regionals of the soon to be new AA. If we are so short staffed why are we paying CAs and FOs to sit at home and do nothing but wait for training in July |
Originally Posted by RomeoSierra
(Post 1348294)
If we are so short staffed why are we paying CAs and FOs to sit at home and do nothing but wait for training in July
thats why they are sitting at home until july. |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1347784)
unless they make a deal to trade 200's for 7/900's.
|
Originally Posted by Releasemaster
(Post 1348332)
And LCC owns part of Mesa, with a large chunk of the rest belonging to Bombardier. Seeing the connection this could be where Bomba gets the planes for a swap deal and allows Dougie to take JO out of the picture.
|
Originally Posted by OnMyWay
(Post 1348351)
He already had that chance.
|
When Mesa was in BK. Doug P could have pulled the contract. Their performance was in the toilet. But he decided to buy 10% and keep them around. Why would he let them go now?
|
Originally Posted by seafeye
(Post 1348605)
When Mesa was in BK. Doug P could have pulled the contract. Their performance was in the toilet. But he decided to buy 10% and keep them around. Why would he let them go now?
BTW the only reason Mesa survived BK was MAG ALPA raising a stink over merging with Skywest and how many pilots they were willing to take. |
Why do I feel like PSA is the town _____! Eagle, Mesa, PDT, etc...
|
I'm surprised that our MEC (PSA) hasn't reached out to the Eagle MEC. With the AA/ US merger imminent, you would think that they would want to map out a strategy. Currently, all ALPA US Express carriers have a committee where they meet to discuss issues and try to prevent whipsaw. I think it's important to get Eagle on board with this committee.
|
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 1349029)
I'm surprised that our MEC (PSA) hasn't reached out to the Eagle MEC. With the AA/ US merger imminent, you would think that they would want to map out a strategy. Currently, all ALPA US Express carriers have a committee where they meet to discuss issues and try to prevent whipsaw. I think it's important to get Eagle on board with this committee.
|
I'm surprised that our MEC (PSA) hasn't reached out to the Eagle MEC. With the AA/ US merger imminent, you would think that they would want to map out a strategy. Currently, all ALPA US Express carriers have a committee where they meet to discuss issues and try to prevent whipsaw. I think it's important to get Eagle on board with this committee. Include furlough protection that requires hiring off the RAPA furlough list before hiring off the street. Do your seniority list integration as you negotiate it, then fence it from below. New hires after that use their RAPA seniority regardless if they transfer from/to another carrier. Think steel workers union.... Take 401k and benefits program away from management also. Just a few ideas to get you started. |
Originally Posted by Mason32
(Post 1349058)
You want to stop the whipsaw... Dump ALPA, form the Regional Airline Pilots Association and write one contract to cover all pilots regardless of which airline they're at. One seniority list based on DOH at a RAPA airline.
Include furlough protection that requires hiring off the RAPA furlough list before hiring off the street. Do your seniority list integration as you negotiate it, then fence it from below. New hires after that use their RAPA seniority regardless if they transfer from/to another carrier. Think steel workers union.... Take 401k and benefits program away from management also. Just a few ideas to get you started. |
Originally Posted by Ultralight
(Post 1349055)
I don't understand. Your posts are quite intelligent and you have a picture of Irion Maiden's plane on your avatar, yet your screen name is Texas pilot. Shouldn't you be listening to country and calling people ya'll!? Shoot!
|
And has a Floridian accent.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands