Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Eagle and PSA merged?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2013 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
flysooner9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Default Eagle and PSA merged?

I'll be the first to say this is of course strictly rumor, no real source but....

With the USA/AA merger most likely being announced on Tuesday. Lets toss around the idea of the new company deciding to merge PSA and Eagle.

Eagle is obviously short staffed and not finding enough pilots to cover its want of 500 pilots this year. It just so happens that PSA has just over 500 pilots. I don't see any furloughs being needed at all. With people flowing to the new AA (either by the all ready in place flow agreements or a new one) they could even continue with the plan of parking 50 seat jets without the need to furlough anyone.

This may sound crazy but i feel like there has to be at lest one merger between the wholly owned regionals of the soon to be new AA.
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 11:31 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: CRJ200 Right
Default

who knows... but just because PSA has 500 pilots doesn't mean anything. PSA has 500 pilots cause it needs 500 pilots to do it's flying. If AE were to just scoop up all the flightcrews at PSA who will do their flying?
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 11:31 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

But if Eagle hires furloughed pilots, they can hire them at first year pay.
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 11:33 AM
  #4  
flysooner9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Default

Well flying on both sides would likely shrink some with the ERJ's and CRJ-200's being parked.
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 11:37 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: FO FOREVER....
Default

that "beautiful idea" (yes veryyyy sarcastic mode ) is why the airline industry is how it is right now! .....
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 11:46 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
Default

sad part is it will most likely happen
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 12:07 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flysooner9
Well flying on both sides would likely shrink some with the ERJ's and CRJ-200's being parked.


Who knows but Airways owns 200s leases until 2019..... Don't see bombardier really wanting more 200s back and allowing them out on leases.....
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 12:14 PM
  #8  
flysooner9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by meyers9163
Who knows but Airways owns 200s leases until 2019..... Don't see bombardier really wanting more 200s back and allowing them out on leases.....
unless they make a deal to trade 200's for 7/900's.
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 12:16 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flysooner9
unless they make a deal to trade 200's for 7/900's.
Don't really follow American but didn't they pick RAH over SKW because they specifically wanted E170s?
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 12:21 PM
  #10  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by meyers9163
Who knows but Airways owns 200s leases until 2019..... Don't see bombardier really wanting more 200s back and allowing them out on leases.....
Tell that to every pinnacle pilot who said the exact same thing bout delta owning the lease on 140 200s....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fly21
Regional
15
08-23-2007 08:06 AM
mregan
Regional
6
06-15-2007 04:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices