![]() |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 2402034)
I've never once been told that at an interview or by another non-regional pilot. As I said before, it literally has nothing to do with skill, for the most part. It has everything to do with economics and capitalism.
|
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
(Post 2401933)
The money is coming from the same place that pays the 200k guy, so how come you're only getting a tiny fraction?
Workers' Wages Sink as 'Domestic Outsourcing' Grows - NBC News |
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
(Post 2401933)
Why do we accept this notion that we are in the minors and are paying dues and are not worth the guy at the "majors"?
We fly aircraft that are as sophisticated, if not in some cases more so than at some of the "majors". We fly 200 some times 300 passengers a day. There's really nothing "regional" about our flying. We do the same exact thing as the guy at the next gate making 200k. Why?? Because in 1970s they flew props and were called regionals and somehow that correlates to today? It makes 0 sense. The money is coming from the same place that pays the 200k guy, so how come you're only getting a tiny fraction? I can't tell if this is a troll or a honest question. The reason regionals are paid less is that they are contract carriers. They don't own the flying. Any one of them is free to start their own airline I would imagine. Their sole purpose is lower wages and increase profits for the mainline company. This is done by whipsawing contracts. IMO the mainline pilots mistakenly gave up scope. Pilots only get what the union can negotiate from mgt. If the flying can be easily moved to another company then the threat of labor unrest carries little water. Thus lower wages. I would imagine the major airlines would prefer to have every pilot work at a regional and have no employees themselves, just contract labor. Why have any union with ability to cause problems. |
Airlines love unions. They're easily fooled (see pensions, scope, SJS) plus it takes years for unions to be able to strike thanks to the RLA. Because apparently we are too important to the economy to be able to fight for the wages we deserve. Airlines can stall for years after a contract expires, while they fool the mediators with the false pretense of "good faith negotiating".
Fortunately there are so many jobs these days that people can fight with their feet. Although I still can't understand how airlines like Mesa and Gojet are still filling classes in today's market. |
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
(Post 2401933)
Why do we accept this notion that we are in the minors and are paying dues and are not worth the guy at the "majors"?
We fly aircraft that are as sophisticated, if not in some cases more so than at some of the "majors". We fly 200 some times 300 passengers a day. There's really nothing "regional" about our flying. We do the same exact thing as the guy at the next gate making 200k. Why?? Because in 1970s they flew props and were called regionals and somehow that correlates to today? It makes 0 sense. The money is coming from the same place that pays the 200k guy, so how come you're only getting a tiny fraction? I agree in many cases you're essentially doing the same job. It's your option to accept the situation, get your employer to charge more for their sub-contract with the mainline and pay you more, get a bigger cut of what's being paid now or take your services elsewhere. You see the market forces acting on the RJ airlines now with bonus and pay increasing in order to attract pilots. So, it's not a stagnant situation. But the fact is that no one is "owed" a certain level of compensation simply because another company pays their workers who do that same job more. |
Pilots are in love with their image and rich parents/military subsidize them for many years. It is not an economical career otherwise. Like the minimum wage, it doesn't need to be raised because nobody can actually make a living on it.
|
Originally Posted by kevbo
(Post 2402124)
Pilots are in love with their image and rich parents/military subsidize them for many years. It is not an economical career otherwise. Like the minimum wage, it doesn't need to be raised because nobody can actually make a living on it.
I haven't taken a dime from my parents since I was 18. Referrring to military service as a government subsidy is both ignorant and insulting not to mention petty. There are plenty of former military folks and pure civilians receiving no money from government sources or their parents who make a fine living as professional pilots. If you chose another path resulting in huge debt, low wages or both, take your whine fest somewhere else and maybe think a bit before you post. |
But Adler, joining the military is so "yesterday"! They make you march and do stuff you don't want to do and wear dorky hats and get up early.... Like, no way, Dude! :p ;)
|
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
(Post 2402164)
But Adler, joining the military is so "yesterday"! They make you march and do stuff you don't want to do and wear dorky hats and get up early.... Like, no way, Dude! :p ;)
(Sarcasm) |
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
(Post 2402110)
You get paid what you (or your union) has negotiated with your employer. That's all the "sense" it has to make.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands