How does the NMB and RLA work
04-21-2007 | 11:21 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
How does the NMB and RLA work
http://www.nmb.gov/publicinfo/factsheet_thru-fy06.pdf
I've attached a simple .pdf for those interested in knowing the basics of mediation and the Railway Labor Act
I've attached a simple .pdf for those interested in knowing the basics of mediation and the Railway Labor Act
04-21-2007 | 11:33 PM
#2
APC co-founder
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
And the short version: http://airlinepilotcentral.com/web_v...060902131.html
Actually, IPA did a great job of presenting a quick pilot-digestible overview:
http://www.ipapilot.org/media/rla.asp
(Look what Brown did for you!)
Actually, IPA did a great job of presenting a quick pilot-digestible overview:
http://www.ipapilot.org/media/rla.asp
(Look what Brown did for you!)
04-21-2007 | 11:38 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Judicial Enforcement of RLA (Management Perspective)
Fact filled real life data regarding the RLA. (difficult to muddle through . . . but offers case examples for those interested in exploring more.)
http://d2d.ali-aba.org/_files/thumbs...G055_thumb.pdf
http://d2d.ali-aba.org/_files/thumbs...G055_thumb.pdf
04-22-2007 | 07:17 AM
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 2
From: FO, looking left
Thank you for posting these links. I was actually going to start this thread on the majors board.
The process does not sound that unreasonable. The company and the union negotiate normally. If they can't reach an agreement, the NMB helps to mediate the talks. If they can't mediate the talks, they are offered binding arbitration. Either side could reject the binding arbitration. This seems like a no brainer for pilots to reject. Wasn't this how Alaska's contract was gutted?? After that, there is a 30 day cooling off period in which the NMB will try its final mediation. At the end of that 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike! If the NMB and president belive there will be a severe disruption of commerce to any state/region, they may order an investigation into negotiations. They have 30 days to investigate, followed by another 30 day cooling off period (I think this is what happened to American 97). After the second 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike again!!
The very last statement from the IPA website is what is wrong, and needs to be fixed.
Congress can legislate your contract and prevent you from striking. Both are BS. A strike should be allowed once all necessary options have been exhausted.
I am calling my congressman on Monday morning to tell him what's wrong. If you agree this is also total BS, ask yourself, what else can you do to help??
The process does not sound that unreasonable. The company and the union negotiate normally. If they can't reach an agreement, the NMB helps to mediate the talks. If they can't mediate the talks, they are offered binding arbitration. Either side could reject the binding arbitration. This seems like a no brainer for pilots to reject. Wasn't this how Alaska's contract was gutted?? After that, there is a 30 day cooling off period in which the NMB will try its final mediation. At the end of that 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike! If the NMB and president belive there will be a severe disruption of commerce to any state/region, they may order an investigation into negotiations. They have 30 days to investigate, followed by another 30 day cooling off period (I think this is what happened to American 97). After the second 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike again!!
The very last statement from the IPA website is what is wrong, and needs to be fixed.
Is there any circumstance in which the parties are constrained from engaging in self-help (striking) after rejecting a PEB's proposal?
Yes. It is possible for Congress to intervene and legislatively mandate a settlement. If this is done, Congress most typically would simply take the recommendations of the PEB and write them into law. This would mean that a contract would be legislated by Congress and no strike or no membership ratification would be allowed.
Yes. It is possible for Congress to intervene and legislatively mandate a settlement. If this is done, Congress most typically would simply take the recommendations of the PEB and write them into law. This would mean that a contract would be legislated by Congress and no strike or no membership ratification would be allowed.
I am calling my congressman on Monday morning to tell him what's wrong. If you agree this is also total BS, ask yourself, what else can you do to help??
04-24-2007 | 02:34 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Thank you for posting these links. I was actually going to start this thread on the majors board.
The process does not sound that unreasonable. The company and the union negotiate normally. If they can't reach an agreement, the NMB helps to mediate the talks. If they can't mediate the talks, they are offered binding arbitration. Either side could reject the binding arbitration. This seems like a no brainer for pilots to reject. Wasn't this how Alaska's contract was gutted?? After that, there is a 30 day cooling off period in which the NMB will try its final mediation. At the end of that 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike! If the NMB and president belive there will be a severe disruption of commerce to any state/region, they may order an investigation into negotiations. They have 30 days to investigate, followed by another 30 day cooling off period (I think this is what happened to American 97). After the second 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike again!!
The very last statement from the IPA website is what is wrong, and needs to be fixed.
Congress can legislate your contract and prevent you from striking. Both are BS. A strike should be allowed once all necessary options have been exhausted.
I am calling my congressman on Monday morning to tell him what's wrong. If you agree this is also total BS, ask yourself, what else can you do to help??
The process does not sound that unreasonable. The company and the union negotiate normally. If they can't reach an agreement, the NMB helps to mediate the talks. If they can't mediate the talks, they are offered binding arbitration. Either side could reject the binding arbitration. This seems like a no brainer for pilots to reject. Wasn't this how Alaska's contract was gutted?? After that, there is a 30 day cooling off period in which the NMB will try its final mediation. At the end of that 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike! If the NMB and president belive there will be a severe disruption of commerce to any state/region, they may order an investigation into negotiations. They have 30 days to investigate, followed by another 30 day cooling off period (I think this is what happened to American 97). After the second 30 day cooling off period, you are allowed to strike again!!
The very last statement from the IPA website is what is wrong, and needs to be fixed.
Congress can legislate your contract and prevent you from striking. Both are BS. A strike should be allowed once all necessary options have been exhausted.
I am calling my congressman on Monday morning to tell him what's wrong. If you agree this is also total BS, ask yourself, what else can you do to help??
The whole thing (the RLA), is BS. Yeah, it sounds reasonable on paper, but getting released by the NMB is VERY difficult. Even if this does happen, if it is a major airline you can bet Congress or the President will step in.
The whole process encourages management to delay. They know there is very little chance of a strike, and any illegal job action will result in hefty fines against the union, which can then be used during negotiations (as happened to the AMR pilots). The result is that pilots, FAs and other work groups covered by the RLA end up getting ****ed at management and service suffers while management delays until midnight of the last day possible in a misguided attempt to keep costs down.
