![]() |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2768972)
So here’s an example. Regional with 1900 pilots. Seniority #100 hired 2014. Is that sustainable?
I think it has the potential not to be. Look at the FAA mandated positions for a 121 carrier. Some of those are pretty restrictive and if someone leaves from one of those from a carrier with a junior pilot group, this could cause some issues. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
To what degree are sim/lca/dpe position salaries constrained by the CBA. Can those be outsourced at competitive salaries?
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2769252)
To what degree are sim/lca/dpe position salaries constrained by the CBA. Can those be outsourced at competitive salaries?
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2769252)
To what degree are sim/lca/dpe position salaries constrained by the CBA. Can those be outsourced at competitive salaries?
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2769252)
To what degree are sim/lca/dpe position salaries constrained by the CBA. Can those be outsourced at competitive salaries?
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 2769804)
while a different approach i heard the FAA was considering allowing LCA's to stay past 65 to just do line checks. let under 65 guys do ioe. also could allow sim guys to be over 65
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2769252)
To what degree are sim/lca/dpe position salaries constrained by the CBA. Can those be outsourced at competitive salaries?
|
This whole thread is completely backwards. Take a look at XJT. Jam packed with lifers, and the problems it causes arent going away no matter what. You can’t have a log jam that prevents movement and expect to attract new talent. THAT is the model that’s unsustainable. As for the thread drift aspect.....I spent most of my life being pretty overweight, yet pretty bright and motivated. I never got the results in life that I felt I deserved and worked for. Then I focused heavily on running and lifting and completely changed my whole appproach to life. Outlook improved, personal relationships improved, the way people treat you improves, all because of how you perceive yourself and how you conduct yourself due to a new level of discipline. It transcends everything. So yes....it’s not universal, but to say that it doesn’t equate, isn’t correct.
|
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2770061)
As for the thread drift aspect.....I spent most of my life being pretty overweight, yet pretty bright and motivated. I never got the results in life that I felt I deserved and worked for. Then I focused heavily on running and lifting and completely changed my whole appproach to life. Outlook improved, personal relationships improved, the way people treat you improves, all because of how you perceive yourself and how you conduct yourself due to a new level of discipline. It transcends everything. So yes....it’s not universal, but to say that it doesn’t equate, isn’t correct.
|
Originally Posted by bradthepilot
(Post 2766985)
One of the most surprising things to me, transitioning from engineering to the airlines, is that pilots only need to be "adequate". There is no reward or recognition for holding a heading +/- one degree instead of the +/- ten degrees, for example.
The pilots who push, nonetheless, for +/- one degree are the ones I want to fly with. In my brief and junior experience, those are also the ones that attract attention from major airlines, LCA or not (mostly not). YMMV, of course. If minimum wasn’t good enough, it wouldn’t be a score. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands