Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Yer on guard!! (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/120777-yer-guard.html)

WestCoastFlyr 03-26-2019 02:34 PM


Originally Posted by dera (Post 2790572)
And if someone seriously suggested pulling tapes for that, i bet the union would "suggest" accidentally clearing the tapes every time you block in.


I agree. I think the FAA knows that if they ever went after CVR/FDR data on the sole basis of assessing a violation to a crewmember, the ramifications of such an act would be huge, and we would be taking a big step backward in using such devices as a safety tool.

dera 03-26-2019 02:50 PM


Originally Posted by WestCoastFlyr (Post 2790576)
I agree. I think the FAA knows that if they ever went after CVR/FDR data on the sole basis of assessing a violation to a crewmember, the ramifications of such an act would be huge, and we would be taking a big step backward in using such devices as a safety tool.

Best way to fix the situation is to punch the other pilot in the face if you catch them doing that sh*t.
Which doesn't really happen. Which is why I think these clowns are most oftne the single pilot cargo guys.

Blackhawk 03-26-2019 02:57 PM

Getting the CVR tapes would be beside the point. In the past the FAA has gone after both pilot certificates for the actions of one pilot, such as flying formation in a commercial airplane. In the eyes of the FAA an FO’s silence is acquiescence.

rickair7777 03-26-2019 03:04 PM


Originally Posted by WestCoastFlyr (Post 2790576)
I agree. I think the FAA knows that if they ever went after CVR/FDR data on the sole basis of assessing a violation to a crewmember, the ramifications of such an act would be huge, and we would be taking a big step backward in using such devices as a safety tool.

FAA has nothing to do with it in this case. It would be federal law enforcement. Whatever protections, by policy or precedent, may or may not apply to the FAA use of the CVR it is utterly not applicable to law enforcement.

Of course once law enforcement got a conviction, an FAA violation would presumably follow based on that alone.

rickair7777 03-26-2019 03:08 PM


Originally Posted by dera (Post 2790572)
And if someone seriously suggested pulling tapes for that, i bet the union would "suggest" accidentally clearing the tapes every time you block in.

The data can still be recovered by the feds. Easily :rolleyes:

The erase button just adds additional proof that you knew you were guilty of something.

dera 03-26-2019 03:27 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 2790606)
The data can still be recovered by the feds. Easily :rolleyes:

The erase button just adds additional proof that you knew you were guilty of something.

Yeah single-wipe recovery is super easy. That's not the point though.
Them going to such lengths would set a precedent that would ruin aviation safety forever.

MySaabStory 03-26-2019 06:27 PM

That’s why I don’t leave home without my rare earth magnets.

Meow1215 03-26-2019 07:25 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 2790603)
FAA has nothing to do with it in this case. It would be federal law enforcement. Whatever protections, by policy or precedent, may or may not apply to the FAA use of the CVR it is utterly not applicable to law enforcement.

Of course once law enforcement got a conviction, an FAA violation would presumably follow based on that alone.

Your severely overestimating to the clearing of red tape that the bureaucracy known as the United States Federal Government is riddled with. Again, even if all the stars aligned and you found the right airplane - how is a "meow" on 121.5 considered a criminal act? That would never hold up, it appears these days actual felonies can't hold up in court. On their worst day, the Meower is looking at a civil penalty.

Blackhawk 03-26-2019 08:17 PM


Originally Posted by Meow1215 (Post 2790752)
Your severely overestimating to the clearing of red tape that the bureaucracy known as the United States Federal Government is riddled with. Again, even if all the stars aligned and you found the right airplane - how is a "meow" on 121.5 considered a criminal act? That would never hold up, it appears these days actual felonies can't hold up in court. On their worst day, the Meower is looking at a civil penalty.

... and possible loss of their FCC license.

MySaabStory 03-26-2019 08:47 PM

Meowwwwwwwwwwwww

Meow1215 03-27-2019 03:50 AM


Originally Posted by dera (Post 2790592)
Best way to fix the situation is to punch the other pilot in the face if you catch them doing that sh*t.
Which doesn't really happen. Which is why I think these clowns are most oftne the single pilot cargo guys.

So you think assault is an acceptable reprimand for FCC violations? You must be a peach to fly with.

rickair7777 03-27-2019 06:33 AM


Originally Posted by Meow1215 (Post 2790752)
Your severely overestimating to the clearing of red tape that the bureaucracy known as the United States Federal Government is riddled with. Again, even if all the stars aligned and you found the right airplane - how is a "meow" on 121.5 considered a criminal act? That would never hold up, it appears these days actual felonies can't hold up in court. On their worst day, the Meower is looking at a civil penalty.

They woudn't go to the trouble just for a slap on the wrist. If (and it's a big if) they decided to go to the trouble to address this they would determine what they needed to do to make the max impact (ie send the message). They obviously cannot infract every violator, so they would would want to make one, or perhaps a couple, of very big examples.

Likely it would be something like criminal charges, then a plea deal to surrender all FAA and FCC certs. First time offender wouldn't be going to jail, but nobody wants a federal conviction for anything either.

rickair7777 03-27-2019 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by Meow1215 (Post 2790856)
So you think assault is an acceptable reprimand for FCC violations? You must be a peach to fly with.

If I had an FO do it, I would tell them not to. One. Second time I would tell the company I needed a new FO (or CA for that matter).

TJBrass 03-30-2019 04:57 AM

“meow” bandit(s)"

I love it!

80ktsClamp 03-30-2019 06:47 PM

It’s most common on the east coast around Charlotte and DC... I bounce from coast to coast and down to Central America. Lots of “bored” manline Pilots down south and around the world (was on the 330 before upgrade) but none of the meowing and low on the other idiocy once you are away from that area.

Truthanator 03-30-2019 07:03 PM

How about a "bark" or a "wuff" every once in a while? Or maybe a Sean Connery accent or some Rick Flair?

No creativity. Pilot nerds.

havick206 03-30-2019 07:16 PM


Originally Posted by Truthanator (Post 2793353)
How about a "bark" or a "wuff" every once in a while? Or maybe a Sean Connery accent or some Rick Flair?

No creativity. Pilot nerds.

Or the phantom clucker

flydrive 03-30-2019 08:17 PM

I heard Chewbacca once...

symbian simian 04-01-2019 11:16 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 2793345)
It’s most common on the east coast around Charlotte and DC... I bounce from coast to coast and down to Central America. Lots of “bored” manline Pilots down south and around the world (was on the 330 before upgrade) but none of the meowing and low on the other idiocy once you are away from that area.

I need more information

80ktsClamp 04-02-2019 07:00 PM


Originally Posted by symbian simian (Post 2794421)
I need more information

I'm not going to mansplain to you. :D

DENpilot 04-03-2019 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 2794955)
I'm not going to mansplain to you. :D

That's sexist, transphobic and every other LGBTQXYZ-phobic insult. How dare you assume their gender or lack of such.

DENpilot 04-03-2019 03:51 PM


Originally Posted by ninerdriver (Post 2787969)
bored mainline guys on transcons.

If you're bored, just be a normal pilot and take a nap or watch Netflix.

BobbyLeeSwagger 04-03-2019 06:01 PM


Originally Posted by DENpilot (Post 2795526)
That's sexist, transphobic and every other LGBTQXYZ-phobic insult. How dare you assume their gender or lack of such.

https://i.imgflip.com/2xph19.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands