![]() |
Article on Flight Shaming and Carbon Emission
http://news.trust.org/item/20191105110922-soqa0
I hope the link works. I have always been a fan of sailing, but know in reality most people don't have a month or two to get somewhere. |
Yep, as opposed to 200 people riding on one airplane I guess they should just all drive separately.
|
Originally Posted by Cefiro
(Post 2918182)
Yep, as opposed to 200 people riding on one airplane I guess they should just all drive separately.
But that doesn't account for the economic and personal cost of the lost time and the required travel infrastructure. Or going around mountains, or over water. |
I'm at the point where I tell people that when I start seeing the transcontinental shipping and cruise ship industry also start aggressively tackling their emissions, they can come back to aviation.
Modern aircraft are so much more efficient that there are much better low hanging fruit to go after now... |
Start with Amazon and the shop-in-your-underwear business model. Way more carbon there.
|
I make it a point to show everybody I am using a plastic straw.
|
Originally Posted by sflpilot
(Post 2918174)
http://news.trust.org/item/20191105110922-soqa0
I hope the link works. I have always been a fan of sailing, but know in reality most people don't have a month or two to get somewhere.
Originally Posted by Cefiro
(Post 2918182)
Yep, as opposed to 200 people riding on one airplane I guess they should just all drive separately.
The nice thing is they are hurting their own cause. They are making this political and it's one of the reason you see more and more people rolling their eyes are the hysteria surrounding this climate alarmism. |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 2922004)
Socialists aren't known for their rational thought.
The nice thing is they are hurting their own cause. They are making this political and it's one of the reason you see more and more people rolling their eyes are the hysteria surrounding this climate alarmism. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2921973)
Start with Amazon and the shop-in-your-underwear business model. Way more carbon there.
Everyone in the neighborhood driving to multiple stores versus one truck delivering all the goods. |
Originally Posted by Blackhawk
(Post 2924639)
Not so sure.
Everyone in the neighborhood driving to multiple stores versus one truck delivering all the goods. Doesn't save any cardboard though. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands