Read the major airline threads...
I know, I know, you are worried about what is going on at your own regional and what it means to you, but most people aren’t doing a lot of flying right now and you will never get a better opportunity to see business models under stress than you do right now.
From a regional perspective it may be easy to say, especially today, “H€|| I’ll gladly go to the first major that calls and then use THAT major as a stepping stone to where I REALLY want to go, but that begs the question of where you do REALLY want to go and realize after a few years seniority is going to pretty well lock you in to where you sit if you sit there very long. And airlines DO go extinct, even MAJOR airlines. Even airlines that were once THE place to be. History Is littered with big names that were once highly desirable but nonetheless went under. PanAm, TWA, Braniff, to name only a few. And the senior guys at those airlines, after a decade or two of building seniority, often got to start over somewhere else AT THE BOTTOM. So just a bit of advice, watch what is going on on the major threads. The cheapest experience you can get is watching what is happening to someone else. |
Sorry.......
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3135071)
I know, I know, you are worried about what is going on at your own regional and what it means to you, but most people aren’t doing a lot of flying right now and you will never get a better opportunity to see business models under stress than you do right now.
From a regional perspective it may be easy to say, especially today, “H€|| I’ll gladly go to the first major that calls and then use THAT major as a stepping stone to where I REALLY want to go, but that begs the question of where you do REALLY want to go and realize after a few years seniority is going to pretty well lock you in to where you sit if you sit there very long. And airlines DO go extinct, even MAJOR airlines. Even airlines that were once THE place to be. History Is littered with big names that were once highly desirable but nonetheless went under. PanAm, TWA, Braniff, to name only a few. And the senior guys at those airlines, after a decade or two of building seniority, often got to start over somewhere else AT THE BOTTOM. So just a bit of advice, watch what is going on on the major threads. The cheapest experience you can get is watching what is happening to someone else. |
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3135091)
Do you have any idea how bad working conditions are at the best regional compared to the worst major? Unless you’re in the last 10 years of your career it always makes sense to move on.
I can honestly say the very best day ever at the regional was still worse that the very worst day I have ever had where I am now.... and I'm just at a decent ACMI and love what I do now. |
Jeez, talk about being detached from reality.
|
Not sure if the point of this, not many people leave one major to go to another.
I think at my carrier we had 20 people leave last year for other carriers. That’s less than 1% of the pilot group. At this point I’m sure most of them (except for the ones who went to UPS and FedEx) are regretting it. |
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3135091)
Do you have any idea how bad working conditions are at the best regional compared to the worst major? Unless you’re in the last 10 years of your career it always makes sense to move on.
|
Live below your means and invest all of your spare money into cash-flowing assets so that it eventfully outgrows your flying income. Then if your airline goes under (or you lose your medical) you'll have another source of income to fall back on.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3135152)
Never said different. What I said was learn from what is going on to help you decide what your ultimate destination is going to be. Do you have an issue with that?
Most regional pilots are not afforded a choice of destinations. If you get a call at all, you hit the lottery and go. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 3135194)
Yes.
Most regional pilots are not afforded a choice of destinations. If you get a call at all, you hit the lottery and go. signed, someone who recently left a regional. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3135152)
Never said different. What I said was learn from what is going on to help you decide what your ultimate destination is going to be. Do you have an issue with that?
Implies to not go to the first one that calls. Turning down any mainline offer and hanging out at a regional hoping Cinderella calls is a bad idea. Nothing wrong with positioning yourself and trying harder for the one you like best, but I think you vastly over-estimate the amount of choice the average regional pilot has in who calls first. |
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3135251)
“From a regional perspective it may be easy to say, especially today, “H€|| I’ll gladly go to the first major that calls and then use THAT major as a stepping stone to where I REALLY want to go, but that begs the question of where you do REALLY want to go and realize after a few years seniority is going to pretty well lock you in to where you sit if you sit there very long”
Implies to not go to the first one that calls. Turning down any mainline offer and hanging out at a regional hoping Cinderella calls is a bad idea. Nothing wrong with positioning yourself and trying harder for the one you like best, but I think you vastly over-estimate the amount of choice the average regional pilot has in who calls first. My intention was to suggest that people pay attention - now that various business models are under stress - to see what happens with the various majors. Because, yeah, a lot of guys at the legacies are probably now wishing they’d taken that offer from SWA right now |
I feel like Excargodog’s point is, and correct me if I’m wrong, that some people only get infatuated with one place?
Kind of like someone being crazy over some ex that cheated on them when there are so many others out there. I feel many of the people I flew with in the regionals wanted to move on, but there were quite a few at mine who definitely weren’t moving as well. They had offers at other places but were comfortable with their QOL. Their choice, but boy they’re on the streets now... yikes. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3135288)
I think you misread the intention. It means what I said, no more and no less. It does not instruct anyone to turn down any offer. But as noted above, junior people in their first couple years at a major ONCE THEY’VE MADE IT THERE frequently have offers from other majors. They are in fact fairly mobile at that point, up until they have accrued enough seniority to be invested in that particular airline.
My intention was to suggest that people pay attention - now that various business models are under stress - to see what happens with the various majors. Because, yeah, a lot of guys at the legacies are probably now wishing they’d taken that offer from SWA right now With all that said... for most people, in the long run/grand scheme, it's better to be furloughed from a major than employed by a regional. Obvious exceptions for those over 50, GED and no other skills, stay-at-home spouse w/kids, etc. It's hard enough as it is to move up, without trying to guesstimate if the economy/industry will hold up for 3-4 years after your class date. I frankly wouldn't trade my somewhat junior number for the job security of my old regional gig. |
Trust me..... If you're afraid of failure, you'll never succeed.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3135359)
With all that said... for most people, in the long run/grand scheme, it's better to be furloughed from a major than employed by a regional. Obvious exceptions for those over 50, GED and no other skills, stay-at-home spouse w/kids, etc.
It's hard enough as it is to move up, without trying to guesstimate if the economy/industry will hold up for 3-4 years after your class date. I frankly wouldn't trade my somewhat junior number for the job security of my old regional gig. What I WAS advocating was that regional pilots educate themselves about what is going on at different majors because, yes, there IS a narrow window of flexibility for the first couple years at a major when junior people DO change employers (I know several former VX acquaintances who bailed from Alaska after they were acquired and other junior FOs who bailed to freight or to/from SWA. It really does happen. And I believe many if not most of the younger regional people ARE going to get an offer to a major once we are fully recovered, be that in two years or ten and - yeah, they are going to take it, because fir the vast majority any major will be better than any regional. But at that time they will have all the things on their resume that let them get that job to begin with and then immediately add a new type-rating and major experience. And when that happens they will have the narrow window of opportunity - a few years at most - before seniority locks them in to the airline they are at for a career, or at least for as long as that airline exists. But the world is changing and some business models are adapting better than others. Don’t get emotionally locked in to yesterday’s winner when the paradigm shifts. Watch what is happening today. |
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3135091)
Do you have any idea how bad working conditions are at the best regional compared to the worst major? Unless you’re in the last 10 years of your career it always makes sense to move on.
|
Originally Posted by Bahamasflyer
(Post 3135533)
How specifically are regionals worse than majors other than a much smaller paycheck of course?
1. Significantly better pay. 2. Significantly better qol 3. Significantly better schedules 4. Significantly less hostility from management 5. Significantly better union in terms of being able to actually defend their pilots. Our current MEC is doing a fine job, but we only have so much power at the end of the day. 6. Better jump seat privileges on the routes that actually matter. 7. Duty Rigs 8. Min Day Guarantee 9. Better per diem 10. Meals I could go on. Its not worth it though. Mainline is far and away the better option. |
Originally Posted by Bahamasflyer
(Post 3135533)
How specifically are regionals worse than majors other than a much smaller paycheck of course?
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3135454)
What I WAS advocating was that regional pilots educate themselves about what is going on at different majors because, yes, there IS a narrow window of flexibility for the first couple years at a major when junior people DO change employers (I know several former VX acquaintances who bailed from Alaska after they were acquired and other junior FOs who bailed to freight or to/from SWA. It really does happen. And I believe many if not most of the younger regional people ARE going to get an offer to a major once we are fully recovered, be that in two years or ten and - yeah, they are going to take it, because fir the vast majority any major will be better than any regional.
But at that time they will have all the things on their resume that let them get that job to begin with and then immediately add a new type-rating and major experience. And when that happens they will have the narrow window of opportunity - a few years at most - before seniority locks them in to the airline they are at for a career, or at least for as long as that airline exists. But the world is changing and some business models are adapting better than others. No one-size-fits-all answer, but I would say that almost any major pax job is pretty good gig so unless you're very young it's an iffy proposition to risk it all for something somewhat better. Some majors honored new-hire classes for a month or so after covid (to protect those who had already resigned from previous gigs), while at the same they did NOT allow some of their own pilots to rescind resignations which had been dropped immediately after covid. There were some major (even some legacy) pilots who went from several years (or more) seniority to on the street with their top-tier class dates cancelled (and pools quickly flushed in some cases). The lucky ones: FDX/UPS new-hires. Every move in this industry carries risk... training failures, background check issues, and of course straight-up bad timing due to black swans like covid and 9/11. Avoiding unnecessary lateral/diagonal moves will probably enhance your overall career stability, at some point it's just career risk vs. greed. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3135071)
I know, I know, you are worried about what is going on at your own regional and what it means to you, but most people aren’t doing a lot of flying right now and you will never get a better opportunity to see business models under stress than you do right now.
From a regional perspective it may be easy to say, especially today, “H€|| I’ll gladly go to the first major that calls and then use THAT major as a stepping stone to where I REALLY want to go, but that begs the question of where you do REALLY want to go and realize after a few years seniority is going to pretty well lock you in to where you sit if you sit there very long. And airlines DO go extinct, even MAJOR airlines. Even airlines that were once THE place to be. History Is littered with big names that were once highly desirable but nonetheless went under. PanAm, TWA, Braniff, to name only a few. And the senior guys at those airlines, after a decade or two of building seniority, often got to start over somewhere else AT THE BOTTOM. So just a bit of advice, watch what is going on on the major threads. The cheapest experience you can get is watching what is happening to someone else. |
Originally Posted by Bahamasflyer
(Post 3135533)
How specifically are regionals worse than majors other than a much smaller paycheck of course?
|
Originally Posted by Trappy
(Post 3135617)
121 Pilots are married to their company and have no job mobility. Majors sell their own tickets, while regionals are cost saving subcontractors. Which do you think is more stable?
on a side note, can we bring pretzels back to the regionals? I get hungry on my flights 😭 and making 68 credits at $36 doesn’t leave me with much money for food after rent, insurance and gas money. Oh, Mesa is pinching me hard. |
Originally Posted by propellere
(Post 3135606)
Probably the same reason why all the major airline pilots tell their kids to never be pilots. Anywhere there is a union, there is this type of uncertain environment. If you need a union to protect yourself, it’s probably an industry that is going away eventually. Wait until the cars have full autopilot like tesla is claiming. Going to see a lot less people taking planes and just sleeping in their cars as they autopilot them 500miles. Automation is going to reduce pilots down to one with a “super dispatcher.” The end is coming in the next 20 years. Drones are already being shot off the boat to tank.
|
Originally Posted by propellere
(Post 3135606)
The end is coming in the next 20 years. Drones are already being shot off the boat to tank.
|
Originally Posted by propellere
(Post 3135606)
Probably the same reason why all the major airline pilots tell their kids to never be pilots. Anywhere there is a union, there is this type of uncertain environment. If you need a union to protect yourself, it’s probably an industry that is going away eventually. Wait until the cars have full autopilot like tesla is claiming. Going to see a lot less people taking planes and just sleeping in their cars as they autopilot them 500miles. Automation is going to reduce pilots down to one with a “super dispatcher.” The end is coming in the next 20 years. Drones are already being shot off the boat to tank.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3135849)
You don't understand the technical and economic hurdles associated automating airliners. It can be done, but not safely or economically. Then you have politics and public perception, it's a lot further off than most people think. Plus add 20 years on top of all that for the natural life-span of the jets.
As far as a perfect choice destination airline, not possible until you have retired and look back to see if it met your needs, expectations and so called dreams whatever they may be. Nothing is under your control, you make the best guess and your lucky at best on your choice of airline that takes you to the finish line. Every choice if you were able to make is a best guess and really has nothing to do with you totally. Just a very lucky or fortunate person makes it through decades without a hitch or in this case unforeseen catastrophic impacts. Mentioned before by several: “Lucky to be hired by FedEx or UPS”. It’s all cyclic and economy dependent. People weren’t even going to FedEx, UPS or Southwest a year ago when called by the others at times. People entering this past decade never really understood that it’s been along time if not the first many pilots had the opportunity to choose where they wanted to live and then the airline vs airline first, then just commute to name one huge difference. It’s back to whoever calls first once again. Now some high seniority folks are headed back into the coal mines they thought they had left years ago. It’s tough out there. Job loss as well, super tough. |
Originally Posted by C17B74
(Post 3135862)
Very true, but everyone forgets the middle step. Everything coming down to single pilot ops first. Don’t worry about full drone capability being pushed, it’s incremental and especially with public perception involved as you’ve all witnessed these past several months. Long haul 4 pilots down to 2, 2 down to one... Although delayed due to COVID19, next airliners were already designed to drop a seat up front. Bought some time, but it’s coming.
As far as a perfect choice destination airline, not possible until you have retired and look back to see if it met your needs, expectations and so called dreams whatever they may be. Nothing is under your control, you make the best guess and your lucky at best on your choice of airline that takes you to the finish line. Every choice if you were able to make is a best guess and really has nothing to do with you totally. Just a very lucky or fortunate person makes it through decades without a hitch or in this case unforeseen catastrophic impacts. Mentioned before by several: “Lucky to be hired by FedEx or UPS”. It’s all cyclic and economy dependent. People weren’t even going to FedEx, UPS or Southwest a year ago when called by the others at times. People entering this past decade never really understood that it’s been along time if not the first many pilots had the opportunity to choose where they wanted to live and then the airline vs airline first, then just commute to name one huge difference. It’s back to whoever calls first once again. Now some high seniority folks are headed back into the coal mines they thought they had left years ago. It’s tough out there. Job loss as well, super tough. Plus it would literally cost billions upon billions to implement, and at the first indication that there's a screw up lack of public faith will tank the program. Most jets still have crt screens instead of led, even though the led's are so much lighter and take so much less effort to cool. The reason is because to manufacturers and buyers it's not worth the money to retrofit them. The biggest shake up I see is that it seems that the LCC's have a much more stable market with not really relying on business travelers in the first place. People want cheap tickets, so the airline that can profit off cheap tickets will be king. |
Originally Posted by Trappy
(Post 3135617)
121 Pilots are married to their company and have no job mobility. Majors sell their own tickets, while regionals are cost saving subcontractors. Which do you think is more stable?
|
Originally Posted by C17B74
(Post 3135862)
Very true, but everyone forgets the middle step. Everything coming down to single pilot ops first. Don’t worry about full drone capability being pushed, it’s incremental and especially with public perception involved as you’ve all witnessed these past several months. Long haul 4 pilots down to 2, 2 down to one... Although delayed due to COVID19, next airliners were already designed to drop a seat up front. Bought some time, but it’s coming.
While you might be able to massage the numbers and make the entire SYSTEM achieve something approximating equivalent safety even with some incap events, what you can't overcome is the perception hurdle because there will be several flights each year which operate at far less than normal airline safety. Regulators and politicians will not be in love with that idea. It's going to be harder than it sounds. The sectors of aviation which routinely operate single-pilot achieve safety levels which have a lot more in common with recreational motor-cycle riding than with 121 ops. Again, it's not happening as soon as you think.
Originally Posted by C17B74
(Post 3135862)
As far as a perfect choice destination airline, not possible until you have retired and look back to see if it met your needs, expectations and so called dreams whatever they may be. Nothing is under your control, you make the best guess and your lucky at best on your choice of airline that takes you to the finish line. Every choice if you were able to make is a best guess and really has nothing to do with you totally. Just a very lucky or fortunate person makes it through decades without a hitch or in this case unforeseen catastrophic impacts.
Mentioned before by several: “Lucky to be hired by FedEx or UPS”. It’s all cyclic and economy dependent. People weren’t even going to FedEx, UPS or Southwest a year ago when called by the others at times. People entering this past decade never really understood that it’s been along time if not the first many pilots had the opportunity to choose where they wanted to live and then the airline vs airline first, then just commute to name one huge difference. It’s back to whoever calls first once again. Now some high seniority folks are headed back into the coal mines they thought they had left years ago. It’s tough out there. Job loss as well, super tough. Even better if you enjoy flying. |
Originally Posted by Meep
(Post 3135932)
Are you arguing the regionals are more stable? Pretty sure 3 regionals have bit the dust within the last 5 months.
|
Originally Posted by C17B74
(Post 3135862)
Mentioned before by several: “Lucky to be hired by FedEx or UPS”. It’s all cyclic and economy dependent. People weren’t even going to FedEx, UPS or Southwest a year ago when called by the others at times.
https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/f...ping-ship.html "The majority of my buddies fly for the UAL/Delta/AA/SWA and truly think I’m nuts staying on board FedEx’s sinking ship." |
Originally Posted by C17B74
(Post 3135862)
Very true, but everyone forgets the middle step. Everything coming down to single pilot ops first. Don’t worry about full drone capability being pushed, it’s incremental and especially with public perception involved as you’ve all witnessed these past several months. Long haul 4 pilots down to 2, 2 down to one... Although delayed due to COVID19, next airliners were already designed to drop a seat up front. Bought some time, but it’s coming.
|
Reduced cockpit staffing is an enormous money saver. How soon? Hard to say. Will every big spender in aviation push for it? Absolutely. Look how hard every contract is fought. Look how hard Boeing pushed to reduce pilot costs on the max
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3136072)
Reduced cockpit staffing is an enormous money saver. How soon? Hard to say. Will every big spender in aviation push for it? Absolutely. Look how hard every contract is fought. Look how hard Boeing pushed to reduce pilot costs on the max
|
Originally Posted by 123494
(Post 3136122)
How hard did they push since the MAX has pretty much the same overhead panel as the 737 Classic?
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3136130)
That’s exactly how they pushed. They’d rather retrofit the rest of the airplane to accommodate the 1950’s flight deck than have airlines possibly have to pay for differences training.
https://i.ibb.co/LYwRcDN/96068-D94-1...DEB1-AC2-B.jpg My read is that they got caught with their pants down by the NEO and needed to quickly put lipstick on a 53 year old pig. They needed a clean sheet design, or better yet, the start of a type-family which Boeing sort of pioneered with the 757/767 42 years ago then dropped with follow on aircraft. |
Originally Posted by Trappy
(Post 3135617)
121 Pilots are married to their company and have no job mobility. Majors sell their own tickets, while regionals are cost saving subcontractors. Which do you think is more stable?
Take health and insurance benefits away from the companies and provided through the union, just have the company remit their share to the union program. Now, when you change jobs, all that changes is where the check comes form. Heck, even move the 401k's to be union managed... now you don't need to roll over or anything else. Lots of things the unions "should" do but never will since they are big business just like the Airlines and big business always takes care of their own first.... they are all sloths guilty of greed.... more for them, none for you. My favorite sins.... |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3136162)
https://i.ibb.co/LYwRcDN/96068-D94-1...DEB1-AC2-B.jpg
My read is that they got caught with their pants down by the NEO and needed to quickly put lipstick on a 53 year old pig. They needed a clean sheet design, or better yet, the start of a type-family which Boeing sort of pioneered with the 757/767 42 years ago then dropped with follow on aircraft. |
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3136130)
That’s exactly how they pushed. They’d rather retrofit the rest of the airplane to accommodate the 1950’s flight deck than have airlines possibly have to pay for differences training.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:05 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands