![]() |
1). Has anyone seen updated tables of retirements with the early outs of covid accounted for? I'm seeing a 20000 over 5 yrs number thrown around.
2). are any regionals struggling for applicants yet? In other words the covid induced glut has been cleared out. I'm just not convinced it will ever reach crisis levels. It's a damn good job (for the right type of person) and airline funded training is an actionable cost effective measure if necessary, and can be implemented gradually as needed. I've got 1000 TPIC and phone is dead silent. Until my peers at the 3-6 year experience level in 121 start moving on in significant numbers I'm not losing any sleep over it and I'm guessing recruiting teams aren't either. |
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3243274)
1). Has anyone seen updated tables of retirements with the early outs of covid accounted for? I'm seeing a 20000 over 5 yrs number thrown around.
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3243274)
I'm just not convinced it will ever reach crisis levels. It's a damn good job (for the right type of person) and airline funded training is an actionable cost effective measure if necessary, and can be implemented gradually as needed.
One thing they don't like about doing that is they commit a lot of money to unknown, and typically very young, candidates. They might be able to guesstimate who will make a good technical pilot by testing but it's harder to guess who will make a good employee and represent the company well that early in your life/career. Guess they can always gamble and reserve the right to not employ you in the end, although flows baked into regional union contracts seem to be trending more towards guaranteed employment.
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3243274)
I've got 1000 TPIC and phone is dead silent. Until my peers at the 3-6 year experience level in 121 start moving on in significant numbers I'm not losing any sleep over it and I'm guessing recruiting teams aren't either.
|
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3243274)
1). Has anyone seen updated tables of retirements with the early outs of covid accounted for? I'm seeing a 20000 over 5 yrs number thrown around.
2). are any regionals struggling for applicants yet? In other words the covid induced glut has been cleared out. I'm just not convinced it will ever reach crisis levels. It's a damn good job (for the right type of person) and airline funded training is an actionable cost effective measure if necessary, and can be implemented gradually as needed. I've got 1000 TPIC and phone is dead silent. Until my peers at the 3-6 year experience level in 121 start moving on in significant numbers I'm not losing any sleep over it and I'm guessing recruiting teams aren't either. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3243137)
foul on the play. Tu quoque fallacy
|
Originally Posted by Oma4545
(Post 3243490)
I’m right there with you. Plenty of TPIC, LCA, M.S. degree, extensive volunteer work and I too have not had any luck. My friends without these things have recently heard from United though so there’s hope for some out there.
|
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3243559)
That's depressing! You've definitely got a leg up on me, but needless to say we're both somewhere in that pile of apps, and hopefully not misplaced
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3243566)
the machine is running again but not full speed. Lotta cjo’s to clear And they cannot call everyone instantaneously
Given that one of the stated purposes of the PSP was to keep people qualified, that’s disappointing. Of course liberal leaves are cheaper than paying for displacement moves, up front anyway... |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3243586)
And in some cases the machines are sputtering pretty badly having early retired many of their training cadre and drastically driven up the training requirement by retiring some of their older and more junior aircraft fleet types.
Given that one of the stated purposes of the PSP was to keep people qualified, that’s disappointing. Of course liberal leaves are cheaper than paying for displacement moves, up front anyway... The rest are flying like crazy. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3239707)
REI in Seattle SOLD A NEW HEADQUARTERS they had not even moved into. The new headquarters is GONE. Working there is no longer even an option for REI:
https://i.ibb.co/C0StBGV/1-B14-D31-A...0-CC336-A2.jpg Now I’m not pretending any of us at this point can accurately predict the extent to which work at home will replace office work - even management experts are debating that - https://i.ibb.co/KX791Ht/7-CEDE71-A-...70-C4-E211.jpg -or that Zoom will replace travel, but it is probably likely that at least to SOME degree and for SOME duration there WILL be an effect. And yes, Rick, while it is indeed not impossible that this will “be good for us,” that sound a little bit like the kid digging through the manure pile hoping to find a pony. Not impossible, certainly, but clearly on the optimistic side..;) |
Originally Posted by ElCaribe
(Post 3244163)
Yes, and Facebook bought REI’s building.Your point is like saying McDonalds bought the burger shop down the street.
Corporations weren't just sending people on business trips on airlines to waste money, they were doing it because it was more profitable in the long run to send people to physical locations. And no, the "infrastructure" has not evolved over the last year. Until you can physically reach out and shake hands with someone over the internet, it will not replace or even make a dent in business travel long term. Any corporation that says they are doing away with business travel is either virtue signalling or making very poor future financial decisions based on an unprecedented economic recession. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands