Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/135174-regional-airlines-want-axe-1500-hour-rule.html)

rickair7777 10-06-2021 05:43 PM


Originally Posted by Swakid8 (Post 3305453)
1500 hours isn’t a arbitrary number, that was always required for the ATP. The difference was now that all operating crew members of a Part 121 flight must now hold a ATP and a PIC type-rating in the aircraft. Not a just a commercial ticket for those not operating in a non-PIC role.

Yes, we've kind of been having a circular argument about why an ATP is required to crew Air Transport operations.

The "1500 hour" rule actually added some exceptions to the old ATP rules (ie R-ATP).

So maybe the discussion should be how low can we go with R-ATP exceptions and under what circumstances? Unless anybody really thinks a 200 hour CPL from a 141 flight school really belongs in a passenger jet?

dera 10-06-2021 05:59 PM

The problem with the whole ATP rule is, that it assumes Riddle grads are somehow more qualified with their R-ATPs than pilots with 135 IFR experience, where the opposite is true. It was just a great lobbying effort from the flight school industry.

There should be credit for 135 operation. It makes the 121 transition easy.

Swakid8 10-06-2021 06:00 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3305488)
Yes, we've kind of been having a circular argument about why an ATP is required to crew Air Transport operations.

The "1500 hour" rule actually added some exceptions to the old ATP rules (ie R-ATP).

So maybe the discussion should be how low can we go with R-ATP exceptions and under what circumstances? Unless anybody really thinks a 200 hour CPL from a 141 flight school really belongs in a passenger jet?

Thats a discussion that can be had, but folks need to stop saying that 1500 is a Arbitrary number that was recently added which it isn’t. R-ATP numbers, sure let’s discuss

tsimmns927 10-06-2021 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3305438)
Essential is going to throw a hussy fit when I say this:
There is no substitute for experience.
No doubt you improved, we all did.
My gripe is with the time number which in itself is meaningless of you don’t require experience as the two are not equal.
Complexity makes a better pilot,
Not flying the same hour a hundred times over.
As long as there is no experience complexity requirement the 1500 is meaningless and nothing but a feel good.
TSA looking for water bottles.

I will ask this and I’ll preface it by saying this is coming from someone who’s not a pilot. What’s the idea in having the R-ATP for 1000 and 1200 hour guys? I can see it for military guys as those people get the best training under the most severe scenarios. However, what’s the difference in someone going to say Liberty University and getting a degree in aviation and only needing 1000 hours compared to someone who goes to basket weaving U and then getting top notch training from a former fighter pilot as his CFI as compared to some young kid from Riddle just trying to get his hours and get out? For this reason alone I’m looking at Liberty University to save 500 hours needed.

TFAYD 10-06-2021 07:10 PM


Originally Posted by tsimmns927 (Post 3305530)
I will ask this and I’ll preface it by saying this is coming from someone who’s not a pilot. What’s the idea in having the R-ATP for 1000 and 1200 hour guys? I can see it for military guys as those people get the best training under the most severe scenarios. However, what’s the difference in someone going to say Liberty University and getting a degree in aviation and only needing 1000 hours compared to someone who goes to basket weaving U and then getting top notch training from a former fighter pilot as his CFI as compared to some young kid from Riddle just trying to get his hours and get out? For this reason alone I’m looking at Liberty University to save 500 hours needed.

and that’s what is so brilliant about these R-ATP programs. Instead of getting 500 hours you get to pay extra tuition. And they get to advertise stuff like “get there first - seniority matters”

Amazing lobbying.

RandomPilotDude 10-06-2021 08:34 PM

So if they do axe the 1500 hour rule, what happens with all the people who are already near atp mins? It wouldn't be fair a 2t0 hour guy can go to the airlines, while the 1300 hour guy worked his way to build the time.

Myfingershurt 10-06-2021 08:37 PM


Originally Posted by RandomPilotDude (Post 3305576)
So if they do axe the 1500 hour rule, what happens with all the people who are already near atp mins? It wouldn't be fair a 2t0 hour guy can go to the airlines, while the 1300 hour guy worked his way to build the time.

Cause, you know, life is known for being fair.

kevin18 10-07-2021 03:39 AM


Originally Posted by Myfingershurt (Post 3305578)
Cause, you know, life is known for being fair.

what?!? Inconceivable!

Swakid8 10-07-2021 04:06 AM


Originally Posted by tsimmns927 (Post 3305530)
I will ask this and I’ll preface it by saying this is coming from someone who’s not a pilot. What’s the idea in having the R-ATP for 1000 and 1200 hour guys? I can see it for military guys as those people get the best training under the most severe scenarios. However, what’s the difference in someone going to say Liberty University and getting a degree in aviation and only needing 1000 hours compared to someone who goes to basket weaving U and then getting top notch training from a former fighter pilot as his CFI as compared to some young kid from Riddle just trying to get his hours and get out? For this reason alone I’m looking at Liberty University to save 500 hours needed.

As a previous R-ATP person who joined the regionals at 1000 hours. Best guess would be because of the structured training and in depth course work from Day 1 of school until degree certification vs the unstructured Part 61 training and lack of in-depth course work in that training environment. There is a big difference both environments. Is the course additional work worth the additional tuition expenses, no they are not.

DontLookDown 10-07-2021 05:09 AM

If anyone should be crying about hours requirements it should be the small mom and pops charter companies.

They need a 1200 hour pilot to fly their pax in IFR.

By the time someone has built 1200 hours, they might as well just keep doing what they’re doing to get 300 more.

Not to mention, we were just discussing if 1500 hours is safe for someone to be an airline pilot.

In the 135 world you might be flying old, piston airplanes with limited capabilities. No extra engine to rely on. You’re MUCH more likely to have a mechanical emergency. You don’t have a dispatcher or ground crew for support. You don’t have a cabin crew or copilot for support. In the regional world you’ll fly the same approaches all the time. In 135 you’re likely going somewhere new most days. As the pilot shortage continues I don’t think many small scale 135’s will stay in business.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands