More?
 

Fly this as a 4th year FO and make $78 and Seat 120Pax
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g1...aj/1116332.jpg

Fly this as a 4th year FO and make $36 and Seat 80pax
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g1...aj/1218107.jpg

40 Pax difference, and a difference of .20 cent per pax so If you put that 4th year FO and gave him the extra 40paxs he/she'd make $54 I'm tryin to prove a point here. Maybe my point is null and void because I don't understand the Scope clause Purpose. As I see it now though it's hurt Pilots as a Group!

The majors giving up scope was the worst thing they could have done. We are our own worst enemy's.

Perhaps I'm not understanding....but how is the fact that the pilot is making $78 instead of $54 a bad thing for pilots?

-Ben

It's a bad thing for the pilot making $54 for flying ultimately the same aircraft.

And your solution is to eliminate scope clauses so that all pilots can make $54 an hour? I'm not sure what your reasoning is here.

That's Hulas Kannodia's username.

The industry has changed.. like it or not.. ***** all you want..

If you dont like it, leave the industry.. if not.. get off your fukcing soapbox

popa, i'm lovin it.

Thats exactly what someone making crap money for flying a 70 seater would say...its sad that they try to justify it. Please fight for better pay on the 70 seaters. I think most regionals are understaffed and overworked right now, and its not going to get any better soon. This is our opportunity to raise our pay. Fight hard for better pay...please.

I agree the more the regionals pay, the more they will have to charge their "mainline" Slavemasters..............than maybe it will make more sense just to have mainline pilots flying larger airplanes..................of course that wont happen because that would just make too much sense