![]() |
50 seat sunset
https://thepointsguy.com/news/united...us-cities/amp/
Fifty-seat service going away as Kirby discussed |
It's almost gone from my hometown, seriously thinking of buying a plane for family visits.
|
I don't believe this is because of what Kirby discussed. Several thousand hours of fly have been giving back to United by the regional carriers due to staffing issues.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by iceman21
(Post 3320465)
I don't believe this is because of what Kirby discussed. Several thousand hours of fly have been giving back to United by the regional carriers due to staffing issues.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by KelvinHelmholtz
(Post 3320469)
Air Whiskey pilots are so deep in denial about this… reminds me of Compass people in 2018-2019 when it was clear their Delta contract would not be renewed
I know the majority of the routes canceled have been ZW routes but EVERY UA regional carrier gave hours back to UA this month. EVERY ONE. Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by iceman21
(Post 3320465)
I don't believe this is because of what Kirby discussed. Several thousand hours of fly have been giving back to United by the regional carriers due to staffing issues.
“We’re struggling with that, we feel some obligation to keep the communities connected, but the economics ultimately aren’t going to work, and pilot shortages — you know, they’re getting squeezed.” he said the pilot shortage (ie carriers giving back hours) makes the 50 seat model unworkable. And so they are winding down the flying https://www.google.com/amp/s/thepoin...view-iata/amp/ |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3320475)
it is exactly what he said
“We’re struggling with that, we feel some obligation to keep the communities connected, but the economics ultimately aren’t going to work, and pilot shortages — you know, they’re getting squeezed.” he said the pilot shortage (ie carriers giving back hours) makes the 50 seat model unworkable. And so they are winding down the flying https://www.google.com/amp/s/thepoin...view-iata/amp/ |
Originally Posted by iceman21
(Post 3320465)
I don't believe this is because of what Kirby discussed. Several thousand hours of fly have been giving back to United by the regional carriers due to staffing issues.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk Delta pilots would love that. However tons of hours were given to their WO due to staffing issues over the summer. |
Originally Posted by iceman21
(Post 3320473)
I'm not in denial about anything. The flying was given back to United. Not taken. Unless this situation was purposefully created by United. We lost 40 to Aviate last month. 18 the first 2 weeks of November. There are no more sims available backing up the training pipeline. Sim dates are now pushing 4 months for new hires.
I know the majority of the routes canceled have been ZW routes but EVERY UA regional carrier gave hours back to UA this month. EVERY ONE. Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by KelvinHelmholtz
(Post 3320553)
But not every one has a fleet of obsolete 20 year old 200s with no prospects of new CPA flying
ZW has a way of throwing a curveball into everyone's crystal ball... Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
ZW has a way of throwing a curveball into everyone's crystal ball... great if they do. But it’s hard to find a credible scenario where single-class 50-seat departures don’t decline substantially in the next year |
Did it get removed?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by WhiskyWhisky
(Post 3320602)
Yes Deleted. Nothing politically based. Factual news story about oil prices. WTF. Time to get my attorney involved. Free Speech rights are a basic Constitutional right. APC had started a war. So have the people who are driving up oil prices.
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3320641)
Lmao. Please get the government involved to force a private business to do something. Truly the pinnacle of small government libertarian thinking.
|
Originally Posted by WhiskyWhisky
(Post 3320684)
I rest my case. 3 posts deleted - each post had ZERO - NOTHING political in the post - and directly related to oil prices and the impact to 50 seaters.
APC is a bunch of commies. Controlling the narrative. Controlling the message. Not much different than Facebook and look what happened to them. It's time to escalate this to a new level. If you aren't going to run an American forum, then expect the consequences. |
Originally Posted by WhiskyWhisky
(Post 3320684)
I rest my case. 3 posts deleted - each post had ZERO - NOTHING political in the post - and directly related to oil prices and the impact to 50 seaters.
APC is a bunch of commies. Controlling the narrative. Controlling the message. Not much different than Facebook and look what happened to them. It's time to escalate this to a new level. If you aren't going to run an American forum, then expect the consequences. cant wait to see the consequences. surprised a Karen like you didn't ask to speak to the manager |
United Airlines was forced to cut service to 11 secondary cities across the midwestern USA beginning in January due to the pilot shortage, the company’s chief executive officer says.
“It’s down to pilots,” Scott Kirby tells viewers of the Skift Aviation conference on 17 November. The pilot shortage is now real, we don’t have enough pilots to fly all the airplanes. It’s very simple.” https://www.flightglobal.com/network...146481.article |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3324468)
United Airlines was forced to cut service to 11 secondary cities across the midwestern USA beginning in January due to the pilot shortage, the company’s chief executive officer says.
“It’s down to pilots,” Scott Kirby tells viewers of the Skift Aviation conference on 17 November. The pilot shortage is now real, we don’t have enough pilots to fly all the airplanes. It’s very simple.” https://www.flightglobal.com/network...146481.article “Hmmm, we can’t seem to find enough pilots” |
Originally Posted by 3400
(Post 3325111)
*throws 2,000 Trans States and ExpressJet pilots to the curb*
“Hmmm, we can’t seem to find enough pilots” |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3325146)
Let me ask you, do you honestly believe a large portion of those pilots are still looking for work? Don’t think so, snatched up during this hiring spree. So, your comment is no longer valid.
But I still know people, that know people at one of those carriers. There were many who simply didn't/weren't able to move on. Many, for obvious reasons, un-hirable or simply didn't want to put in the work And that's on them.... On a side note, it's comical that the "contraction" of 50 seats jets (in this case) ISN'T due to their aged out airframes, inefficiency, level of discomfort/customer dissatisfaction, what have you.... ....it's a lack of pilots. |
Agreed there are a few with every regional that are unhireable at any other regional, LCC, or major. Not wanting to commute, skeletons in the closet, etc. But most will get on with another carrier when push comes to shove. This is an amazing time. I cannot recall anything like it in the last half a century, since the dawn of the jet age.
|
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3325154)
I cannot recall anything like it in the last half a century, since the dawn of the jet age.
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 3325153)
It was years ago that I left.
But I still know people, that know people at one of those carriers. There were many who simply didn't/weren't able to move on. Many, for obvious reasons, un-hirable or simply didn't want to put in the work And that's on them.... On a side note, it's comical that the "contraction" of 50 seats jets (in this case) ISN'T due to their aged out airframes, inefficiency, level of discomfort/customer dissatisfaction, what have you.... ....it's a lack of pilots. |
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
|
Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
(Post 3325218)
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
they can’t staff the planes they have right now so the least profitable routes get triaged and yes he could fill more 76 seaters… but not from MLU-IAH |
Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
(Post 3325218)
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3325230)
I thought for sure that he would follow Delta’s lead with the A220 coming out of the pandemic. It would have offered a great product for small to medium markets, given UAX up to 70 more 175’s, and facilitated the elimination of the single class 50 seaters. The brand would be greatly improved. He went a different route. Instead of a SNB, he ordered hundreds of max/neo’s, got no additional 175’s, and the single class 50 seaters are still going to be mostly phased out. I’m glad that the United pilots dug in their heels on scope. It forced Kirby’s hand and it turns out that he picked higher paying aircraft over a SNB. I guess time will tell which company picked the right path.
One of the things Kirby did very well when he came from AA that really put UA back in the game as OM was leading the company was to dramatically expand the network with all those old 50 seaters over the pretty strenuous market/wall street and customer objections. I truly hope that this currrent upgauging results in continued improved connectivity and is not just being driven by a CASM - only perspective. UAs strength is their network. Shrinkage in domestic network connectivity isn't what I'd be betting on out of the pandemic. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3325230)
I thought for sure that he would follow Delta’s lead with the A220 coming out of the pandemic. It would have offered a great product for small to medium markets, given UAX up to 70 more 175’s, and facilitated the elimination of the single class 50 seaters. The brand would be greatly improved. He went a different route. Instead of a SNB, he ordered hundreds of max/neo’s, got no additional 175’s, and the single class 50 seaters are still going to be mostly phased out. I’m glad that the United pilots dug in their heels on scope. It forced Kirby’s hand and it turns out that he picked higher paying aircraft over a SNB. I guess time will tell which company picked the right path.
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3325179)
just for giggles, there was a time in the 60’s when the majors were hiring guys with wet commercials. Like 250 hr straight to the cockpit of a jet… course it was sitting sideways
My first time in a simulator was in the late 1960s. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3325198)
There is definitely a lack of pilots wanting to enter the field. Some don’t want to do the work, some aren’t willing to put in the time it takes to get to a career company, while others won’t do it without a guaranteed outcome or defined timeframe. That is a problem, however the contraction of the 50 seat aircraft is also largely influenced by consumer demand and scope. Managers like Kirby would love to retire all of the 50 seaters and replace them with brand new 175’s and mainline aircraft where appropriate, but they can’t. The decision for the industry to shrink the 50 seaters is just as much influenced by scope, an aging fleet with no replacements, and customer complaints about a garbage product as it is a shortage of pilots. With increasing demand and limited airport capacity, the only way to meet that demand is with larger aircraft. Being that scope is maxed out, as gauge increases, the legacies grow and the regionals shrink.
I guess I should have clarified and included "in this case, Kirby is blaming it on...." Or, what the guy below say VVVVVVVV
Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
(Post 3325218)
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3325227)
true true unrelated
they can’t staff the planes they have right now so the least profitable routes get triaged and yes he could fill more 76 seaters… but not from MLU-IAH There were a few places where only the 50 seater made sense and could get in/out of. And I believe the marketing/revenue department exploited the crap out of those markets fare wise. |
And also for EAS locations. They can run an empty plane and, with the government subsidy, still make a little money.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands