![]() |
Originally Posted by LoneStar32
(Post 3343082)
See what I mean? It always becomes just another dick measuring contest especially when the WO weenies chime in. Very cute
we could pick another question- who has the best work rules. From what i gather republic’s rigs are much better than the largely non-existent ones at the WO’s |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3342998)
Thats just it though, but saying having multiple airlines at a lower status level (RPA, SKW) are better than the WOs. You are saying that they are better than main benefits. WOs get mainline benefits from Day1. Not some second tier level like the UA exclusives or Endeavor.
surely folks in this thread who work for RPA won’t start class at AA on day 1 thinking they will miss RPA travel benefits over AAs (holidays same as WOs). |
Originally Posted by LoneStar32
(Post 3343091)
Who said they were better? Stop projecting your insecurities and putting words into other people's mouth. The point is that there really isn't that much difference between the two, and there isn't. And it certainly shouldn't factor in where you choose to work. But I understand that some WO regionals need all they can plus super inflated bonuses that just scream that we are desperate to attract talent these days.
But come on Lonestar, i would bet you a 100 dollars and round on me that one or ever have experience AA mainline privileges (24 hour check-in, 6 D1 passes a year, D2 priority with jumpseat privileges, Zed) you wouldn’t think twice about your RPA privileges. I am not here to defend any WO work rules and conditions as I’ve said earlier, I have no skin in the game and there are reasons why I left a WO. At the end of the day, travel privileges shouldn’t be a top deciding factor on where to go work however it can be used a tie breaker. It was for me when picked a WO over RPA. That worked for me and worked for me will not work for others. |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3343120)
Look the question is about the best travel privileges right? Are you going sit here day and think that RPA travel privileges are better that AA mainline privileges? (AA mainline = WO) Say yes because you obviously think so.
But come on Lonestar, i would bet you a 100 dollars and round on me that one or ever have experience AA mainline privileges (24 hour check-in, 6 D1 passes a year, D2 priority with jumpseat privileges, Zed) you wouldn’t think twice about your RPA privileges. I am not here to defend any WO work rules and conditions as I’ve said earlier, I have no skin in the game and there are reasons why I left a WO. At the end of the day, travel privileges shouldn’t be a top deciding factor on where to go work however it can be used a tie breaker. It was for me when picked a WO over RPA. That worked for me and worked for me will not work for others. |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3343025)
Dude, have you even flown a hour of 121 yet?
|
Originally Posted by kevin18
(Post 3343135)
I’m in the group of multiple options. I don’t care if I’m in the back or up front. The fact is you have a better chance when you have more busses to get from a to b. I’ve experienced this going from coast to coast using multiple carriers over one of the busiest travel days. Not to mention that if you live in a hub at a AA Mainline/WO you’re automatically lower than anyone traveling through that hub regardless of if you checked in at 23hrs59min59sec prior to departure.
Good point. At AA, those who are traveling and are connecting through a hub will have through and transfer status added to their category which will beat out those who are starting their travel in a hub. That is because of how the system process the check-in time because obviously, those who are starting their travel at a outstation will have a earlier travel time. When I lived in Dallas, I saw a lot of this. When I lived in ORF, I benefited from this. But I be a devil advocate, I still had those same multiple options that you had obviously will a better chance of going coast to coast on AA and lower chance as a OAL. Still managed just fine with mainline priority. |
If you wanna play the game you drive to gsp an fly gsp-clt-lhr and then you get the transfer priority. Or you drop a D1. Or you do both.
either way, as noted above, AA mainline and WO have exactly identical travel benefits and they are seniority agnostic |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3343165)
Fixed it for you
Good point. At AA, those who are traveling and are connecting through a hub will have through and transfer status added to their category which will beat out those who are starting their travel in a hub. That is because of how the system process the check-in time because obviously, those who are starting their travel at a outstation will have a earlier travel time. lets say I’m flying gsp-clt departing 0700 clt-lga departing 0900 i check in at 0600, 1 hour before departure im still ahead of everyone originating in clt for the clt-lga flight. Even if they checked in 3 days ago and have rolled from flight to flight to flight because they were full transfer pax are a fundamentally different category. It’s not just that they can check in earlier |
As someone who has had both, sorry, but I like Republic’s benefits better. There’s nothing like the ability to take the Skytrain across DFW when AA is falling apart in an IROP or even just a normal day with all the revenue standys, D1T’s etc and hop on a wide-open United flight to the same exact place. The flexibility gained is absolutely worth the lower priority to me.
To each their own. One man’s trash is another man’s Miata. |
Zed
we can all hop on any wide open flight |
Originally Posted by SunDevilPilot
(Post 3343251)
As someone who has had both, sorry, but I like Republic’s benefits better. There’s nothing like the ability to take the Skytrain across DFW when AA is falling apart in an IROP or even just a normal day with all the revenue standys, D1T’s etc and hop on a wide-open United flight to the same exact place. The flexibility gained is absolutely worth the lower priority to me.
To each their own. One man’s trash is another man’s Miata. |
Originally Posted by SunDevilPilot
(Post 3343251)
As someone who has had both, sorry, but I like Republic’s benefits better. There’s nothing like the ability to take the Skytrain across DFW when AA is falling apart in an IROP or even just a normal day with all the revenue standys, D1T’s etc and hop on a wide-open United flight to the same exact place. The flexibility gained is absolutely worth the lower priority to me.
To each their own. One man’s trash is another man’s Miata. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3343146)
But am I wrong?
Having to come up with reasons to affirm your choice to yourself this early on in your career is generally not a good thing. |
None. Apply to every major/ulcc to escape the whipsaw.
|
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 3343497)
Yup.
Having to come up with reasons to affirm your choice to yourself this early on in your career is generally not a good thing. Heck, the person who experienced both travel benefits sided with RPA bennies. With that With that, I digress. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3343296)
JS privelages
we can all hop on any wide open flight |
Originally Posted by JayBee
(Post 3343634)
and for free
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3343540)
I’m not reaffirming anything to myself. As someone who approached this objectively from the time recruiters walked through the door (RPA/AA WO alike), I’d say I offer a slightly different POV. Strictly outside looking in, I thought it through plenty of times. Did plenty of hw on this and thus I got my opinion.
Heck, the person who experienced both travel benefits sided with RPA bennies. With that With that, I digress. That being said, like it has been pointed out a number of times in this thread, WO travel bennies do not differ from the mainline in any way, shape or form. Think RPA's options are better? That's fine, your choice. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3343655)
Was thinking wife and kid, but i get it
|
Originally Posted by JayBee
(Post 3343783)
well they get free on any AA if WO or ZED just like any other though OMG RPA gets one step higher on the bottom of the list.
|
Let's try to bring a little objectivity to this here.
On balance, the AA WO privileges are probably a bit better, but not a lot better. I've traveled long-haul on 20 segments now in my time at Republic, and have gotten business or first on 18 of them and premium economy on the other 2. If you know what you're doing, it's not hard, even with an AAC/SA5X/S3C priority. D1s/D2s are great, and I wouldn't complain at all about having them, but I definitely would miss passrider access to UA and DL. As much as anything, simply having access to the loads makes commuting less uncertain, and therefore less stressful. Of course there are apps like Staff Traveler, but it sure is nice to make an evaluation with multiple airlines based on actual data. There are lots of buddies and ZEDs traveling that the non-WO regionals with AAC have priority over, particularly to places like South America. Those are all people we'd be behind (or at even priority with) without our benefits on multiple airlines. Somebody above also brought up the point of IROPS that I don't think was given enough weight. Flights are generally full (particularly pre-COVID), and it's not always as simple as waltzing over to a wide open flight on another airline with a ZED/jumpseat. I am consistently above multiple other people on both United and Delta, and that priority has gotten me where I needed to go where a lower priority wouldn't have. That's not to mention the priority for the jumpseat I enjoy on both UA and DL, so when IROPS strike and there are a boatload of offline pilots trying to get on I have peace of mind knowing that I have priority over them for both seats up front and in the back. Again, on balance these types of things don't happen regularly (though lately they seem to be happening more often) and the D1s/D2s would be incrementally more valuable, it's flat out wrong to say there's no argument for why non-WO flight benefits are more valuable. In every IROPS situation I've been able to travel, with a priority that is not at the bottom, on an unaffected airline (excepting widespread weather events, obviously). I'll also add that in my 3 years I have watched a full flight leave without me exactly twice, both on the United side, and in both instances I caught a flight an hour later. So I think there's a lot of merit to the notion what we lose in priority we make up for with flexibility. Depending on where you live and where you're trying to go, that can be very useful. |
Your thoughtful and reasoned post brings a lot to the discussion. Thanks!!
|
Originally Posted by Longhornmaniac8
(Post 3343834)
Let's try to bring a little objectivity to this here.
On balance, the AA WO privileges are probably a bit better, but not a lot better. I've traveled long-haul on 20 segments now in my time at Republic, and have gotten business or first on 18 of them and premium economy on the other 2. If you know what you're doing, it's not hard, even with an AAC/SA5X/S3C priority. D1s/D2s are great, and I wouldn't complain at all about having them, but I definitely would miss passrider access to UA and DL. As much as anything, simply having access to the loads makes commuting less uncertain, and therefore less stressful. Of course there are apps like Staff Traveler, but it sure is nice to make an evaluation with multiple airlines based on actual data. There are lots of buddies and ZEDs traveling that the non-WO regionals with AAC have priority over, particularly to places like South America. Those are all people we'd be behind (or at even priority with) without our benefits on multiple airlines. Somebody above also brought up the point of IROPS that I don't think was given enough weight. Flights are generally full (particularly pre-COVID), and it's not always as simple as waltzing over to a wide open flight on another airline with a ZED/jumpseat. I am consistently above multiple other people on both United and Delta, and that priority has gotten me where I needed to go where a lower priority wouldn't have. That's not to mention the priority for the jumpseat I enjoy on both UA and DL, so when IROPS strike and there are a boatload of offline pilots trying to get on I have peace of mind knowing that I have priority over them for both seats up front and in the back. Again, on balance these types of things don't happen regularly (though lately they seem to be happening more often) and the D1s/D2s would be incrementally more valuable, it's flat out wrong to say there's no argument for why non-WO flight benefits are more valuable. In every IROPS situation I've been able to travel, with a priority that is not at the bottom, on an unaffected airline (excepting widespread weather events, obviously). I'll also add that in my 3 years I have watched a full flight leave without me exactly twice, both on the United side, and in both instances I caught a flight an hour later. So I think there's a lot of merit to the notion what we lose in priority we make up for with flexibility. Depending on where you live and where you're trying to go, that can be very useful. I will add, FedEx and UPS are the best kept secret in terms of needing to get somewhere depending on where you are going. If you live in place that has access to likes of DHL flights or Amazon flights as well, those are also options for jumpseatinf as well. |
LMAO at these clowns thinking having WO benefits on only one airline is better than having slightly lower benefits (but higher jumpseat priorities) on 3-4 mainline carriers + zeds on everyone else.
Having mainline level benefits on AA isn't worth much when DFW/ORD is getting pounded by thunderstorms and AA is in total meltdown. Being able to instantly check loads on other carriers without having to call a buddy or get on staff traveler to be able to find a flight out of town and actually get on because you'll have priority over the WO schmuck who only has AA benefits can be quite invaluable. |
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3344089)
WO benefits on only one airline is better than having slightly lower benefits on 3-4 mainline carriers .
D1 (employee “vacation” pass) D2 (standard employee) D2R (retirees) D2P (parents) AAC (republic et al) D3 ( buddy passes) ZED Each of the classes above is fully seated before the next gets anything. AAWO employees have d2 standard and an annual d1 allocation same as all mainline employees. It’s not an inconsequential difference. the point about flexibility in an irrop is well taken. But, for me, the “value” in nonrev was long-haul premium family travel. To get 4 lay flat seats to paris or Buenos Aires… AA mainline benefits are the way to go The 4th mainline carrier is who? |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3344151)
the point about flexibility in an irrop is well taken. But, for me, the “value” in nonrev was long-haul premium family travel. To get 4 lay flat seats to paris or Buenos Aires… AA mainline benefits are the way to go
That difference in priority matters less on international as there are no free international upgrades. And also, imagine being overseas and the one AA flight cancels and you gotta get home? Those UA/DL bennies make that a LOT easier. That actually happened to me. the 4 mainline would be Alaska, which I’ll admit, pretty useless unless you live in SEA or PDX. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3344151)
Slightly lower is an inaccurate description. For the benefit of anyone else reading, AA nonrevrs are sorted as follows
D1 (employee “vacation” pass) D2 (standard employee) D2R (retirees) D2P (parents) AAC (republic et al) D3 ( buddy passes) ZED Each of the classes above is fully seated before the next gets anything. AAWO employees have d2 standard and an annual d1 allocation same as all mainline employees. It’s not an inconsequential difference. the point about flexibility in an irrop is well taken. But, for me, the “value” in nonrev was long-haul premium family travel. To get 4 lay flat seats to paris or Buenos Aires… AA mainline benefits are the way to go The 4th mainline carrier is who? I definitely have to sweat it out more that D2s do a lot of the time, but I've made it work! Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3343810)
Sewage Mate, 1st Class is indeed better than Sewage Mate, 2nd Class
you remind me of the guys that put Airman first class rank on and then try to boss around other Airman hahahaha as I said earlier in the thread, this is like trying to argue which hooker has the best herpes by all means if you think that travel bennies are the deciding factor ya'll go for it ! |
Whatever. I offered my perspective.
we can all find examples of when a different toolset worked better. Considering the totality of the circumstances, I find AA mainline nonrev benefits superior to those offered by republic. (FYI that doesn’t mean I think Republics are bad or that WO is a better job/career) |
Originally Posted by JayBee
(Post 3344215)
That moment when one riff-raff thinks they are better than other riff-raff only to realize one day that they are all indeed riff-raff...
you remind me of the guys that put Airman first class rank on and then try to boss around other Airman hahahaha as I said earlier in the thread, this is like trying to argue which hooker has the best herpes by all means if you think that travel bennies are the deciding factor ya'll go for it ! I'm not really clear what your point is or how you feel like you're furthering discussion here. Particularly when your premise that regionals have inferior privileges is demonstrably false in the case of AA and its WOs, which have the exact same travel benefits. |
I had benefits on three carriers at my precious regional. Then I got hired at AA.
AA flight benefits are the same as AA WO regional benefits, and I can say that the AA benefits are way better. The better priority is so much better than flying as AAC/S3C/SA5X. There was the one time when the AA flight cancelled and I ZED my whole family on United coming out of Europe, and having the three benefits would have saved me a little bit of money. But the majority of the time, higher priority I have as a mainline employee is better for me. |
I meant to say previous, not precious haha
|
I wish I had time to travel on my days off.
|
Originally Posted by MidsizeSUV
(Post 3345298)
I wish I had time to travel on my days off.
|
Let me ask a slight OT total noob question...
If you're flying stand by, are you able to check luggage? Can't imagine doing a week+ abroad in cold weather with just a carry on, but maybe I'm doing it wrong. |
Originally Posted by CareerPivot
(Post 3347831)
Let me ask a slight OT total noob question...
If you're flying stand by, are you able to check luggage? Can't imagine doing a week+ abroad in cold weather with just a carry on, but maybe I'm doing it wrong. |
Originally Posted by kevin18
(Post 3347847)
You’re doing it wrong. I did a two week trip in Europe in October through Jordan and Switzerland. All with an international carry on. Just plan to do laundry. That being said, you can check luggage. It will always go through with or without you. So while you may not make a flight, your luggage will. That’s only good when you’re going home.
That being said, checking bags as a nonrev is a horrible idea. Even if you gate-check the bag after getting a seat, they might pull you off and leave your bag on if it’s a domestic flight. |
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3347867)
international bags don’t get on a plane unless the passenger is confirmed on board.
That being said, checking bags as a nonrev is a horrible idea. Even if you gate-check the bag after getting a seat, they might pull you off and leave your bag on if it’s a domestic flight. |
Originally Posted by kevin18
(Post 3347888)
that was my point. Still stands international not withstanding. My international story was saying that nonreving around with an international carry on is something that is easily done for weeks at a time.
|
Originally Posted by CareerPivot
(Post 3347831)
maybe I'm doing it wrong.
wash hotel laundry layer rewear wash/layer/rewear (ie only need “clean” touching your skin) buy clothes ship things home |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands