Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CRJ turb tgt spd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2007 | 03:12 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Default CRJ turb tgt spd

Hello,

In our company the turbulent air penetration speed is 280/.75 whichever is lower.

Was told by someone that when bombardier designed the CRJ-200 this was meant to be a MINIMUM speed meaning that if you hit rough air you are to accelerate to atleast that, much preferable something above that. The reason given was this speed designed to be a MINIMUM speed to guarantee buffet protection margin.

What does your company say about that and how do they have you fly? Have any of you heard about anything described above?

Thx
-schone
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 04:03 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by schone
Hello,

In our company the turbulent air penetration speed is 280/.75 whichever is lower.

Was told by someone that when bombardier designed the CRJ-200 this was meant to be a MINIMUM speed meaning that if you hit rough air you are to accelerate to atleast that, much preferable something above that. The reason given was this speed designed to be a MINIMUM speed to guarantee buffet protection margin.

What does your company say about that and how do they have you fly? Have any of you heard about anything described above?

Thx
-schone
yeah its the same number i believe for every company. we had that discussion here a little while back on our company message board. we came to the conclusion that there is no way it is a minimum speed speed. if it were that would mean that at 2000 feet you would need to accelerate to 280kts if you ran into some rough air. i personally think it would be crazy if the rj's only protection in turbulance is to speed up. doesn't make sense. if it were rough air all the way down you could never land because if you slowed down the plane would stall. i believe the 280 is maneuvering speed, i.e. don't go faster than it for structural reasons.
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 04:12 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
yeah its the same number i believe for every company. we had that discussion here a little while back on our company message board. we came to the conclusion that there is no way it is a minimum speed speed. if it were that would mean that at 2000 feet you would need to accelerate to 280kts if you ran into some rough air. i personally think it would be crazy if the rj's only protection in turbulance is to speed up. doesn't make sense. if it were rough air all the way down you could never land because if you slowed down the plane would stall. i believe the 280 is maneuvering speed, i.e. don't go faster than it for structural reasons.
Yep - it's a structural limitation. Bingo.
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 04:32 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Default

That was my understanding as well, tho I've been strictly told by a ca that bombardier train differently.... figured i'll raise it as a conversation see if other companies say something different.
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 04:39 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by schone
That was my understanding as well, tho I've been strictly told by a ca that bombardier train differently.... figured i'll raise it as a conversation see if other companies say something different.
its a good conversation, i think we went 6 or 7 pages with it.
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 04:54 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
its a good conversation, i think we went 6 or 7 pages with it.
and like that proverbial question asked to ten different CFI's, I bet you get 15 different answers in those pages LoL
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 05:11 PM
  #7  
SharkAir's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by schone
In our company the turbulent air penetration speed is 280/.75 whichever is lower.
Ooh, is your company based in Utah?
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 06:08 PM
  #8  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 10
From: Bus driver
Default

hot/heavy and mid 30's at the cruise carats you won't do better than .75M anyway...
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 06:23 PM
  #9  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

If 280 was the absolute minimum speed they wanted you to penetrate turbulence at, then they wouldn't publish the following in the factory manuals:

Flight Crew Operating Manual, Volume 2

Limitations
Page 02-06-04

8. TURBULENCE PENETRATION SPEED

Maximum (emphasis added) air speed for turbulence penetration is 280 KIAS or 0.75 Mach, whichever is lower
At ACA/Independence we used 280/.75 as max penetration or 250/.70 for passenger comfort.

Also, FWIW, design maneuvering speeds vary depending on the aircraft weight and pressure altitude from as low as 161 knots (sea level, light weight) to as high as 305 knots (30,000' PA, 53,000lbs).

Design maneuvering speed (Va) is defined as Full Application of rudder and aileron controls as well as maneuvers that involve angles of attack near the stall, must be confined to speeds below Va.
Reply
Old 07-13-2007 | 06:37 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

design maneuvering speed also means that the plane will stall itself in the specified area of stress before sustaining structural damage or failure. but that isn't always true either.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM1337
Regional
14
09-03-2015 11:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices