![]() |
Aircraft Manning Comparison....
XJT -- 11.6 pilots per plane
RAH -- 9.6 pilots per plane AE -- 10.4 pilots per ASA -- 11.2 pilots per COMAIR -- 9.9 pilots per Skywest -- 10 pilots per AirWis -- 11.6 pilots per Horizon -- 10.3 pilots Per Pinnacle -- 10.1 pilots per Mesaba -- 14 pilots per Trans States -- 10.9 pilots per AA -- 13.1 CAL -- 13.4 DAL -- 15.5 NW -- 11.9 UAL -- 18 USAir -- 13.7 UPS -- 12.6 FedEx -- 13.1 All numbers are per Aircraft. Numbers of Pilots and aircraft are from APC info. Certainly the numbers arnt 100% but give good baselines. Who seems to be overstaffed...and who seems to be understaffed? |
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 246754)
Who seems to be overstaffed...and who seems to be understaffed?
|
Nice work though. I don't understand Masaba's 14 per aircraft though
|
me either TD.... with all the talk would have thought they would be on the south side of those numbers.
|
Originally Posted by HSLD
(Post 246760)
Hard to tell unless you add aircraft block hours or daily fleet utilization to the equation.
|
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 246768)
me either TD.... with all the talk would have thought they would be on the south side of those numbers.
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 246763)
Nice work though. I don't understand Masaba's 14 per aircraft though
|
Though it is clear that the legacy carriers and the cargo guys have higher numbers of pilots per plane than the National/Regional carriers. FWIW... Southwests number is 11 pilots per aircraft more in line with the smaller carriers than the legacy's. And certainly without the additional info that HSLD spoke of its not a complete statistic, but it certainly shows trends within types of carriers. I suspect the higher crew numbers for the mainline carriers is due to their international flying and the requirement to have crews in crew rest for extended periods of time in international destinations.
|
Originally Posted by boilerpilot
(Post 246777)
The important number to look at is FOs or CAs per a/c. That's why I wouldn't go to Mesaba as a direct entry CA, the reason they don't have enough CAs is because none of their FOs have enough time to qualify for ATP mins. I think a lot of people are going to get bumped down to FO or lance CA or at least ride reserve for a couple years because while that FO was below you time wise, he or she is above you seniority number wise.
|
Originally Posted by boilerpilot
(Post 246777)
a/c. That's why I wouldn't go to Mesaba as a direct entry CA, the reason they don't have enough CAs is because none of their FOs have enough time to qualify for ATP mins.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands