Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SkyWest - Lost Campaign

Old 01-03-2008 | 01:28 PM
  #11  
ghilis101's Avatar
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

oh well its over now, and like was said before, time will tell what happens.

there is no collective anything anymore. people are too selfish, they forgot how powerful labor unions could be if they all just stuck together. instead its every person for themselves. so just wait and see for the next set of bad news. but as for now, no news is good news.
Reply
Old 01-03-2008 | 01:33 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
In the past 10 years there have been 3 Union Drives and every single time the same people threaten and predict that if skywest votes down the union we will turn in to mesa and every single time they are proven wrong and our managment team keep their promise of revisiting pay issues. SAPA is currently negotiating a new pay package for us an will have it done very soon.
Ever heard of the term, "quid pro quo?"

Anyways, SAPA has no leverage and therefore there is no "good faith bargaining" going on. You will get whatever Skywest management thinks the minimum required is for the best interest of the shareholders.
Reply
Old 01-03-2008 | 01:40 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Not only should the inverter be made aware of it, but the pilots should be made aware of it
Those who are interested (more than you probably think) will seek the information. It's not being hidden from anybody.

Originally Posted by Nevets
I have put no words in Skywest management. This was taken word for word from their SEC filling.
I was not referring to your quote, but rather to:

Originally Posted by Nevets
Although it would be nice to see someone other than Skywest management actually admit that they only pay what they pay because of other collective bargaining.
This is your interpolation of the quote, not a fact or admission.
Reply
Old 01-03-2008 | 01:46 PM
  #14  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by meritflyer
Look, I want the SKYW guys to be paid what they're worth. Unfortunately their bark has no bite with respect to SAPA. SAPA has no legal grounds to negotiate anything. They can suggest certain things to management but when it comes down to it, management has no legal obligation to conform as a union carrier would.
I agree completely and although SAPA has no "bite," Mgmnt has proven that they will negotiate with them and treat them with respect. Mgmnt sees SAPA as a huge internal resource that allows them to keep their finger on the pulse of their pilot group. They know that if they keep us happy we’ll continue to perform as one of the nation’s best carriers and without SAPA they will lose insight. So in order to keep the wool pulled over our eyes (that SAPA does have a “bite”) they must continue to negotiate with SAPA and keep us among the top in the industry in pay & QOL (yes I now the industry was estabished on the sweat of others). We’ll see in 10 years when and if we have new Mgmnt the result of having no representation but as long as we have Dixie (current and Ex-SKW pilots know what I'm talking about LOL!) in the house I think this philosophy will hold.

I hope I’m not around when it does turn south.

Originally Posted by Nevets
SAPA has no leverage and therefore there is no "good faith bargaining" going on. You will get whatever Skywest management thinks the minimum required is for the best interest of the shareholders.
Yes SAPA has no true legal leverage but the threat of the many things gives them more leverage then you would think. BTW, everything we have here at SKW is the result of "good faith bargaining" and has been so for over 35 years. Mgmnt has continued to respect us and now that the ALPA drive has failed I must join in the faith and pray it never bite us.

Originally Posted by meritflyer
This is exactly why ASA guys have felt some bad blood towards their SkyWest counterpart.

I hope that one day they can find a way to look past the bad blood but I fear the worst. I’m sure that the large majority of ASA pilots will be able to move on but the older pilots will continue to find us being non-union hard to stomach. It’s sad that, just like them, we’re trying to make the best living we can so that we can enjoy our life, family and friends.

Even though I voted YES for ALPA I must now look toward the new SAPA elections so that we can oust those who are true company men (complete pushovers with NO flight) and replace them with new blood willing to fight. At least fight as much as they can…………..? I must support my pilot group and deal with what I’ve been dealt.

I will also continue to support ASA pilots as best as I can. I’m just sorry that some will never get past the fact that our pilot group isn’t represented but things do work very well over here and I hope that continues.

Last edited by JetJock16; 01-03-2008 at 04:26 PM.
Reply
Old 01-03-2008 | 10:04 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by waflyboy
Those who are interested (more than you probably think) will seek the information. It's not being hidden from anybody.



I was not referring to your quote, but rather to:



This is your interpolation of the quote, not a fact or admission.
I know it wasn't hidden from anyone. After all, I found it and post it here.

That was not my "interpolation." It was me lamenting the fact that many people here don't admit what Skywest management says publicly. That is that, "Any new collective bargaining agreements entered into by other regional carriers may also result in higher industry wages and increased pressure on us to increase the wages and benefits of our employees. Future agreements with unionized and non-unionized employees may be on terms that are not as attractive as our current agreements or comparable to agreements entered into by our competitors."

My "interpolation" is that Skywest management admits that other pilot's collective bargaining agreements may require them to "increase the wages and benefits" and thus "may not be on terms that are not as attractive as [thier] current agreements...entered into by [thier] competitors."

Last edited by Nevets; 01-03-2008 at 11:43 PM.
Reply
Old 01-03-2008 | 10:13 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
Yes SAPA has no true legal leverage but the threat of the many things gives them more leverage then you would think. BTW, everything we have here at SKW is the result of "good faith bargaining" and has been so for over 35 years. Mgmnt has continued to respect us and now that the ALPA drive has failed I must join in the faith and pray it never bite us.
I don't think you understand a couple of things. The threats you speak of are NOT collectively controlled by a unified group and therefore not able to be used as true leverage upon management. Its just the pressures of maintaining adequate, good, qualified employees (which all unionized pilot groups have going for them as well).

Also, "good faith bargaining" doesn't mean that management asks you nicely what you want and that they actually listen. "Good faith bargaining" only happens when their is true leverage which ultimately means that their is the ability to "self help." As "at-will employees" you have no such rights under current labor laws.

Anyways, please don't take this as an attack on you or on the Skywest pilot group. I just wish that more of them understood these things.
Reply
Old 01-04-2008 | 06:16 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Default

The only reason ya'll complain, I believe, is because you are so anti-management brainwashed that you simply cannot believe there is a even a shred of good in our mgmt team. We've all got it good...in slightly different ways, so quit trying to tell me how lousy my boss is - its getting very old, very quick.

Last edited by ExperimentalAB; 01-04-2008 at 01:12 PM. Reason: because I screwed up the formatting on the iPhone
Reply
Old 01-04-2008 | 08:12 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
The only reason ya'll complain, I believe, is because you are so anti-management brainwashed that you simply cannot believe there is a even a [I]little[/] bit of good in our mgmt team. We've all got it good...in slightly different ways, so quit trying to tell me how lousy my boss is - its getting very old, very quick.
Nicely said.
Reply
Old 01-04-2008 | 09:36 PM
  #19  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
everything we have here at SKW is the result of "good faith bargaining" and has been so for over 35 years. Mgmnt has continued to respect us and now that the ALPA drive has failed I must join in the faith and pray it never bite us........

...... I must now look toward the new SAPA elections so that we can oust those who are true company men (complete pushovers with NO flight) and replace them with new blood willing to fight. At least fight as much as they can…………..? I must support my pilot group and deal with what I’ve been dealt.

I'm happy to report that there are folks who have now stepped up to compete against the incumbents in the upcoming SAPA executive board elections (no, I'm not one of them).

Vote your choices, often
Reply
Old 01-04-2008 | 10:46 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
The only reason ya'll complain, I believe, is because you are so anti-management brainwashed that you simply cannot believe there is a even a shred of good in our mgmt team. We've all got it good...in slightly different ways, so quit trying to tell me how lousy my boss is - its getting very old, very quick.
Not so, at least not with me. I work at ExpressJet. We drink the kool aid with the best of any Skywest pilot. I beleive we have an excellent management team that treats us like professionals, for the most part. We just NOT dellusional in thinking that managements' first concerns are with the shareholders and sometimes that is in direct contrast to the best interests of pilots. And that is okay. That is their job. I'm glad they do it to keep the company afloat. But we also are able to look out in the best interest of pilots first with real leverage and real good faith bargaining. And sometimes we agree that pilots may have to sacrafice a bit now for a better long term situation. Trust me, we know this, especially those of us doing the Branded, Delta, and charter side of our business.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
Cessnadriver
Regional
27
11-16-2007 07:10 PM
Ellen
Regional
92
07-11-2007 06:56 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices