![]() |
Gojets & Gulfstream
I keep seeing people take a knock at these two companies, and I imagine it's probably because of QOL, Pay, or upgrade time. Whats the scoop?
|
Use the search function and then read for about two hours. You will quickly learn.
|
Originally Posted by Clue32
(Post 321929)
Use the search function and then read for about two hours. You will quickly learn.
I was afraid of that... :o |
Originally Posted by Scooter2525
(Post 321931)
I was afraid of that... :o
There are good reasons for the angst shown towards both companies, read and learn.:) Checko |
Originally Posted by Scooter2525
(Post 321931)
I was afraid of that... :o
|
To summarize briefly...
QOL, pay, and upgrade time are not really issues with gojet and GIA. If you're looking for poor pay, QOL, and emotional abuse try mesa/freedom or maybe TSA or pinnacle. Gojet and GIA have a bad rap because many of their pilots obtained their status as airline pilots through undesireable or unethical means. |
but not all of them
|
here we go again...:rolleyes:
|
for the kinggg!!!! waaaaaahhhhhhggggg!!!! :mad::mad: (the war has begun) :)
|
Originally Posted by 145Driver
(Post 322022)
here we go again...:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 322010)
To summarize briefly...
Gojet and GIA have a bad rap because many of their pilots obtained their status as airline pilots through undesireable or unethical means. |
I believe that Trans States took some flying from GoJet by the pilots undercutting a contract or something like that...I'm not sure..you better look it up to make sure of it.
|
Originally Posted by denramp
(Post 322154)
I believe that Trans States took some flying from GoJet by the pilots undercutting a contract or something like that...I'm not sure..you better look it up to make sure of it.
|
Originally Posted by grossole
(Post 322155)
Is that supposed to be some sick joke?
Heck, what do I know....I just know what I see throwing bags...that's why I said look it up |
Originally Posted by denramp
(Post 322156)
Heck, what do I know....I just know what I see throwing bags...that's why I said look it up
Hey Grossole.....Did you cut and paste that sticker from the no Alter Eagle stickers that American Eagle had going around several years ago?? It looks just like them. |
Originally Posted by denramp
(Post 322159)
Hey Grossole.....Did you cut and paste that sticker from the no Alter Eagle stickers that American Eagle had going around several years ago?? It looks just like them.
|
Originally Posted by denramp
(Post 322154)
I believe that Trans States took some flying from GoJet by the pilots undercutting a contract or something like that...I'm not sure..you better look it up to make sure of it.
|
Originally Posted by denramp
(Post 322154)
I believe that Trans States took some flying from GoJet by the pilots undercutting a contract or something like that...I'm not sure..you better look it up to make sure of it.
|
Originally Posted by wolf
(Post 322204)
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and suppose that perhaps he's dyslexic. (By the way denramp, if you're not dyslexic it was the other way around...)
They say that "10 out 9" people don't even know that they're dyslexic :D |
Originally Posted by meeko031
(Post 322328)
They say that "10 out 9" people don't even know that they're dyslexic :D
Im only dyslexic with letters and numbers :p |
I'm still trying to understand the whole GoJet issue. A few years ago there was hostility floating around when TSA started flying as American Connection. A friend of mine was an F.O. for Eagle and had a "No Alter-Eagle" sticker and TSA pilots now have the no "Alter EGo" stickers. My friend told me that TSA undercut the American Eagle pilot group and as a result Eagle lost flying and he was a 6 year F.O. on the 145. I understand a lot of things happened in that time frame that effected the industry, but he was happy blaming TSA for his misfortune. As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times. I understand the pay was below standard and the TSA pilots rejected the flying in an appreciable attempt to gain a better pay scale but were not successful. GoJet hired their own pilots and began operation. ALPA (Who has not negotiated a new contract for TSA in years) offered to represent GoJet and GoJet rejected that offer by selecting Teamsters. No where in this whole situation was there ever a picket line or a strike. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I have never seen the non-biased, non-emotional truth written about this.
|
Originally Posted by TrevorW
(Post 323483)
I'm still trying to understand the whole GoJet issue. A few years ago there was hostility floating around when TSA started flying as American Connection. A friend of mine was an F.O. for Eagle and had a "No Alter-Eagle" sticker and TSA pilots now have the no "Alter EGo" stickers. My friend told me that TSA undercut the American Eagle pilot group and as a result Eagle lost flying and he was a 6 year F.O. on the 145. I understand a lot of things happened in that time frame that effected the industry, but he was happy blaming TSA for his misfortune. As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times. I understand the pay was below standard and the TSA pilots rejected the flying in an appreciable attempt to gain a better pay scale but were not successful. GoJet hired their own pilots and began operation. ALPA (Who has not negotiated a new contract for TSA in years) offered to represent GoJet and GoJet rejected that offer by selecting Teamsters. No where in this whole situation was there ever a picket line or a strike. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I have never seen the non-biased, non-emotional truth written about this.
Some of the concessions that management gave the waterskiers included massive paycuts, loss of block or better and cuts to bennefits (which already suck). ALPA has been in negotiations for quite a while now. Management at TSA is dragging their feet as much as they can per the RLA. The only thing that's happening is that DH and his lawyer buddies are getting rich and Hulas is going to owe a ton of retro pay. The old contract was pretty standard fare for the time that it was signed. The MEC is working hard to improve it, but management is cheap. As far as GJ being teamsters, they aren't a member of local 747, the airline branch. A number of carriers from 747 wrote very passionate letters to national to oppose their inclusion. Instead they joined local 618. Then they preceeded to sign a CBA that was FAR below any CRJ-700 payscales in the industry. Block isn't everything. Havning worked for TSA I know their other bennies suck. To throw the Eagle arguement into it is BS. Pilots don't make that choice. The comair strike a few years back taught the legacies that they can't rely on one regional provider. The whipsaw is happening everywhere and the only way to stop it is to not accept below average contracts. That's exactly what the GJ pilots did. As a result, it's harder for TSA, Pinnacle, RAH and every other pilot group in negotations to raise the bar. |
There is a simple reason why people are angry. Pilots at TSA worked hard to make money for the company for years. The company then used this money to start a new airline to pick up 70 seat flying. These pilots stood up for a higher pay rate that was deserved. Instead, other non-union pilots were hired to fly for a lower rate. The new higher paying jobs, in the newer jets that these pilots had in essence worked to get, are now flown by external pilots. Thats the whole reason people at TSA were angry.
It was the GoJet pilots that chose to go work for cheaper rates than a union was in the process of negotiating. If no pilots had been willing to go, the TSA pilots would have gotten to keep the flying they helped pay for. |
Originally Posted by TrevorW
(Post 323483)
I'm still trying to understand the whole GoJet issue. A few years ago there was hostility floating around when TSA started flying as American Connection. A friend of mine was an F.O. for Eagle and had a "No Alter-Eagle" sticker and TSA pilots now have the no "Alter EGo" stickers. My friend told me that TSA undercut the American Eagle pilot group and as a result Eagle lost flying and he was a 6 year F.O. on the 145. I understand a lot of things happened in that time frame that effected the industry, but he was happy blaming TSA for his misfortune. As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times. I understand the pay was below standard and the TSA pilots rejected the flying in an appreciable attempt to gain a better pay scale but were not successful. GoJet hired their own pilots and began operation. ALPA (Who has not negotiated a new contract for TSA in years) offered to represent GoJet and GoJet rejected that offer by selecting Teamsters. No where in this whole situation was there ever a picket line or a strike. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I have never seen the non-biased, non-emotional truth written about this.
|
Originally Posted by TrevorW
(Post 323483)
...As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times...
|
Originally Posted by Flyboy8784
(Post 323315)
Im only dyslexic with letters and numbers :p
|
These answers are why I started the post... searching through the other forums found more of emotional vents... THANK YOU!
|
It seems like pilots are their own worst enemies. Hopefully the inevitable mergers will make the industry better for pilots.
|
And to make matters worse, since I have been there they have gotten a 50 seat payscale into their "contract"
Which I believe will be hung over our heads later down the road. the first fight and ill will against go jet may have eased some in the industry, but a I think a new and bigger one could be around the corner. |
Originally Posted by TrevorW
(Post 323692)
It seems like pilots are their own worst enemies. Hopefully the inevitable mergers will make the industry better for pilots.
|
Originally Posted by AirWillie
(Post 323731)
TreverW, I don't know if you're a pilot or whatever. That Eagle VS AAConnection carriers is totally different than Gojet. Gojet is a scab operation, if you choose to go to Gojets you will be blacklisted by ALPA and other pilots, good luck finding a job. Gojet pilots are supporting an operation which was started against union approval, they undermined the bettering of TSA pilot contract, and regional airline pilots, and the whole industry in general. Those CRJ7s that you see are supposed to be TSA airplanes and crews, that is why pilots who go there will be treated accordingly. If you like flying with no dignity, avoiding other's and would like hiding your badge at the airport go ahead and fly for Gojets. Most of the guys that go there are foreign nationals and guys you wouldn't want to share a cockpit anyways.
|
But will the go jet pilots be blacklisted eventually? or is this just an unofficial blacklist?
|
Originally Posted by icarosF1
(Post 323952)
AirWillie, i doupt that you know what a scab is. also NOBODY from GJ has been blacklisted by ALPA. Eagle/AAConnection is exactly the same. Did AAConnection pilots undercut AE pilots ABSOLUTELY YES. I am one of them. The GJ CRJ's would be TSA pilots they had agree to accept the flying. Just because TSA pilots don't want to fly for 1-2 dollars more that does not mean that companies will shut down. PILOTS DO NOT OWN COMPANIES. Again why TSA did not strike. We are setting standards such as 22$ versus 24$ are you kidding me ? those 2 dollars will bring the bar higher ? THATS WHY OUR SALARIES DROPED. Not because of GJ or TSA because companies offered that kind of money and ALPA SAID go ahead guys take it. NOBODY strike.Nobody did anything about it.So quot crying about who took my flying your flying etc etc and do your jobs.Stickers mean absolutely nothing.In my eyes if I see a sticker like that the only think that crosses my mind is UNPROFFESSIONAL.
|
I just talked to a Colgan Q400 F/O, guess where he was before Colon.........................????????
Gulfstream, :) what a joke |
exwaterski, Correct Hulas created GJ. Now what did your union did about it ?
NOTHING. See my dear fellow pilot what i do not understand is how all those (specific) TSA pilots or even pilots that they are having moral issues with GJ and outfits like GJ and they talk or are pro-ALPA and against scubs and all about blacklisting people, they now work in places such us Continental(talking about scubs), AirTran(ValueJet), JetBlue(ALPA overs and ex MEC there now) and i can get you a list of more.Again realise PILOTS DO NOT RUN AIRLINES.what you or I think won't change a damm thing unless someone does something about it. I would call GJ pilots SCUBS only if TSA pilots went on strike.Did they, hmmmm no.Why ? for the same reason probably that GJ pilots got the job. Got families to feed and time to built. Alot of people may or may not like it but oh well, when my wifes brother got furlough after 26 years in the same company guess what ALPA and their supporters did feed his family neither pay his bills. Can you support that ? |
Originally Posted by icarosF1
(Post 324089)
exwaterski, Correct Hulas created GJ. Now what did your union did about it ?
NOTHING. See my dear fellow pilot what i do not understand is how all those (specific) TSA pilots or even pilots that they are having moral issues with GJ and outfits like GJ and they talk or are pro-ALPA and against scubs and all about blacklisting people, they now work in places such us Continental(talking about scubs), AirTran(ValueJet), JetBlue(ALPA overs and ex MEC there now) and i can get you a list of more.Again realise PILOTS DO NOT RUN AIRLINES.what you or I think won't change a damm thing unless someone does something about it. I would call GJ pilots SCUBS only if TSA pilots went on strike.Did they, hmmmm no.Why ? for the same reason probably that GJ pilots got the job. Got families to feed and time to built. Alot of people may or may not like it but oh well, when my wifes brother got furlough after 26 years in the same company guess what ALPA and their supporters did feed his family neither pay his bills. Can you support that ? |
And ALPA never did anything to go against Midwest/Skyway Airlines management when they brought in SkyWest for the CRJs. Now the Skyway pilots are getting shown the door with nothing in hand. Having a talk or two doesn't cut it. Fees were paid for services not rendered, ALPA needs an overhaul.
|
Icaros, weren't you another screen name a while back???
And "my dear fellow pilot"??? You were at scabjet, no? If I am correct, and your poor spelling seems to ring true, your "dear pilots" ARE ONLY FELLOW SCUM.... And here is a heads up... There have been numerous scabjets who did NOT get a job due to their "proud" history..... That, scooter, you can be sure of....And your knowledge of unions and the RLA is stellar... Why didn't they strike?? Do you have any knowledge of the RLA? The NMB? And the union who was in place? Are you bitter that you didn't have a union hand to hold onto while Uncle H was mounting you like a trophy buck.....????? Enlighten, please.....
|
Originally Posted by Flyboydan
(Post 324202)
And ALPA never did anything to go against Midwest/Skyway Airlines management when they brought in SkyWest for the CRJs. Now the Skyway pilots are getting shown the door with nothing in hand. Having a talk or two doesn't cut it. Fees were paid for services not rendered, ALPA needs an overhaul.
|
When are you guys gonna understand that Alpa doesn't care for the regionals?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands