Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

C-Series

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2008 | 08:26 PM
  #21  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,864
Likes: 663
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
From what i was told by the guys here at NWA, they dont want the E-190 because it is already out of date as far as they are concerned. They cant justify spending big money like that on old technology when the C-series is supposed to be 35-45% more efficient than the Ejet. FWIW
Yeah, the C-series is suppoed to incorporate some bleeding-edge technology...including geared turbofans. I think a 40% efficiency gains might not be unrealistic.

Last edited by rickair7777; 03-13-2008 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old 03-13-2008 | 08:30 PM
  #22  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,864
Likes: 663
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Killer51883
is there a reason why boeing and airbus arent trying to get this market? I know they are working on the 787 and the a350 or whatever airbus is going to call their 787 version but they have a ton of clout with the majors. It wouldnt be that hard for them to draw up and build a competitive 100 to 150 seat jet to replace all the old dc9/md80/734-5's out there.
??? Boeing is already entrenched in that market...the low-end 737 models have always seated in the low-hundreds. Airbus has produced a few short buses (A319/A318).

The question is going to be how will Boeing react to an RJ maker who intrudes on their market. The C-series has not been officially launched yet, so there has been no reaction from Boeing, but I'm sure they have a plan.

Bombardier might get squashed like a bug. But I have to admit they are playing it very smart by emphasizing high-tech features...they might succeed by beating the next-gen Boeing/Airbus narrowbodies to market.
Reply
Old 03-13-2008 | 08:46 PM
  #23  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
??? Boeing is already entrenched in that market...the low-end 737 models have always seated in the low-hundreds. Airbus has produced a few short buses (A319/A318).

The question is going to be how will Boeing react to an RJ maker who intrudes on their market. The C-series has not been officially launched yet, so there has been no reaction from Boeing, but I'm sure they have a plan.

Bombardier might get squashed like a bug. But I have to admit they are playing it very smart by emphasizing high-tech features...they might succeed by beating the next-gen Boeing/Airbus narrowbodies to market.
It was just officially announced that they will go into production.
http://www.bombardier.com/index.jsp?.../3_8/3_8_1.jsp
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 04:26 AM
  #24  
seafeye's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Hot tub for now
Default

Originally Posted by UnlimitedAkro
The regionals wont be able to fly them because of scope clauses. An aircraft with 130 seats belongs at a major. Period.

Anything over 70 seats should be at a major...Better yet make that 50 seats. Everyone would benifit if this was the case....except for maybe the profit margins of the majors!
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 06:24 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 686
Likes: 12
From: Maddog FO
Default

The C-Series will sell... along with the NG NG 737 (sorry but don't know what they'll call it yet). Airbus will come out with a newer A320 (using the A350 technology). All 3 will compete. Who would have thought the A320 would have been a success against the best selling airliner ever?? It's the best market out there (130-150 seaters).
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 07:08 AM
  #26  
surreal1221's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UnlimitedAkro
The regionals wont be able to fly them because of scope clauses. An aircraft with 130 seats belongs at a major. Period.
Truth!

Let's just hope the Major pilots don't consider it a "little jet" and decide they don't want to fly it.

Hopefully they have wised up to their previous failings of scope implementation and understand that they NEED to fly the damn thing to better the profession.
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 07:28 AM
  #27  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,864
Likes: 663
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
It was just officially announced that they will go into production.
http://www.bombardier.com/index.jsp?.../3_8/3_8_1.jsp
No, I don't think so. Last I heard was that management had authorized offering the C-series. But that's different from a launch. You don't just start manufacturing airliners, put them in cold stoarage, and hope somebody will buy them...you need a customer first. I think they may be close to working out a deal or two, but nothing has been announced yet.
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 12:32 PM
  #28  
Avroman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
Default

According to our Bombardier factory instructor NWA has been all over them to get the C-series going as the replacement for the DC-9s.... We shall see but based on that they would be a good guess for a launch customer.
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 02:38 PM
  #29  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,864
Likes: 663
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
According to our Bombardier factory instructor NWA has been all over them to get the C-series going as the replacement for the DC-9s.... We shall see but based on that they would be a good guess for a launch customer.
NWA might be a sufficiently large buyer to justify a single-customer launch...bombardier needs at least 50 orders, preferably closer to 100.
Reply
Old 03-14-2008 | 03:34 PM
  #30  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

I think the NWA will be the launching customer. NWA already has options for any Bombardier aircraft and with the oil price skyrocketing, both DC9s and even CRJ900s are no longer economically attractive.

C series will be flown by Mainline NWA pilots due to the scope clause. NWA already has experiences with the Embraer 175s and the feedback is not that great. It's even less economical to run than CRJ900s and has electronic maintenance issues. A maintenance tech told me they have a nick name for E175s, they call them E180s for making a 180 turn to return to the gate soon after pushback. So, NWA is likely to go with the C series as a DC9 replacement.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Planespotta
Hangar Talk
10
11-01-2007 08:26 AM
GasPasser
Military
10
10-26-2007 05:32 PM
CitationX92
Part 135
0
10-14-2007 12:36 PM
Huck
Cargo
32
07-14-2007 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices