Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Tprops in a Jet world (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/23847-tprops-jet-world.html)

The Juice 03-19-2008 02:02 PM


Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi (Post 344142)
Yes. The general public is stupid.

Stupid is right. Give people the option when they book. Have $20 fuel surcharge when they book if the want to fly the 145, that would be funny to see.

JetJock16 03-19-2008 02:16 PM

I for one am headed back to the Prop as CA and I'm excited. It's nice to see the future starting to include these, what some where calling, relics. There efficiency at the regional level is often underrated due to the public’s perception but with the next gens including higher cruising speed and more passenger comfort, I truly believe that they hold an important role in domestic's air travels future. With higher fuel prices mainlines starting to shift more flying into international markets while pulling out of (errrrr neglecting) domestic because of Joe Publics unwillingness to pay higher fuel surcharges, this is the reason why 30-74 PAX T-Props will see a resurgence. If Joe Public wants a $100 ticket then they’ll have to fly on T-props (Emb-120, Saab 340, Q2/3/4's) for their short to short/intermediate hops, larger RJ's (CR7/9, E-170/75) for intermediate, small narrowbodies (E-190/5, C-series, 717, 737, A319/20) for intermediate/long haul, larger narrowbodies (737-800, A321, 757) for long haul/transcontinental domestic with the occasional small widebody (767) for transcontinental.

Regardless, fuel surcharges have to increase..............period.

rorwizard 03-19-2008 02:20 PM


Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi (Post 344142)
Yes. The general public is stupid.

I agree one hundred percent

Pilotpip 03-19-2008 02:26 PM


Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi (Post 344142)
Yes. The general public is stupid.

Be that as it may, they are the reason you have a paycheck.

saabguy493 03-19-2008 02:31 PM

Dash 8 300??? that has 50 seats right? Maybe they are dumping all the money is something better than the q400??!?!?!?

flynwmn 03-19-2008 02:35 PM

You can put I believe 57-60 but doesnt make sense 7-10 more people if fully loaded doesnt work since the whole FA requirement thing.

MaxRampW8 03-19-2008 02:37 PM


Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi (Post 344142)
Yes. The general public is stupid.

Didn't an FA say something like that on David Letterman? "The customer is the enemy." That was classic.

The Juice 03-19-2008 02:37 PM


Originally Posted by saabguy493 (Post 344168)
Dash 8 300??? that has 50 seats right? Maybe they are dumping all the money is something better than the q400??!?!?!?

Expect to see Colgan get started in the Dash 200/300 business.

Moose Surgeon 03-19-2008 03:02 PM

Hey stupid question, What is the difference between the dash 100/200. Thanks

usmc-sgt 03-19-2008 03:08 PM


Originally Posted by saabguy493 (Post 344168)
Dash 8 300??? that has 50 seats right? Maybe they are dumping all the money is something better than the q400??!?!?!?

You havent heard about plans on the drawing board for the Q400X? 90 passengers, they plan on just stretching the fuselage a bit, strengthening the gear and not derating the current engines on the Q400s.


Series 200: Series 100 airframe with more powerful Pratt & Whitney Canada PW123 engines (rated at 2,150 shp or 1,604 kW) for improved performance also capable of carrying 37 to 39 passengers.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands