Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Total Time and PIC time required to upgrade at most regionals (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/24986-total-time-pic-time-required-upgrade-most-regionals.html)

rickdb 04-11-2008 07:32 AM

Total Time and PIC time required to upgrade at most regionals
 
Any insight on this topic would be greatly appreciated. I have been told by a few people that low time pilots who are going to the regionals (i.e. 300-400 hrs) do not have enough PIC time to upgrade to CA when the time comes. Is their a PIC requirement to upgrade to CA, or is it just based off total time. Also, I have been told that you can log SIC time as 1/2 PIC. Is this true?

Thanks.

DeadHead 04-11-2008 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by rickdb (Post 360904)
Any insight on this topic would be greatly appreciated. I have been told by a few people that low time pilots who are going to the regionals (i.e. 300-400 hrs) do not have enough PIC time to upgrade to CA when the time comes. Is their a PIC requirement to upgrade to CA, or is it just based off total time. Also, I have been told that you can log SIC time as 1/2 PIC. Is this true?

Thanks.

No, 1/2 PIC????? Somebody was trying to pull one over on you.

Depending on the company's need, it could range from the 1500-3000 TT with close to 1,000 in type.
I believe most companies look for time closer to the 3,000 hour TT range.

Beyond that it really depends on your seniority number, and how quick that number will make you eligible for upgrade.
These days, it will probably be more likely that you will meet the hour/experience requirements a long time before your seniority number qualifies you for upgrade.

FlyJSH 04-11-2008 07:34 AM

With all flying comes down to two things:

Do you meet FAA mins? In this case ATP mins

Do you meet Insurance mins? More important than the first question

BankAngle09 04-11-2008 07:36 AM

Most likely those 300-400 hr. guys/gals are not gonna meet the ATP mins, and you've got to be 23 y.o. as well

grossole 04-11-2008 07:36 AM


Originally Posted by DeadHead (Post 360907)
No, 1/2 PIC????? Somebody was trying to pull one over on you.

For ATP PIC requirements, you may substitue 1/2 of your SIC time as PIC.

FlyerJosh 04-11-2008 07:38 AM

Most airlines have upgrade/insurance requirements around 2000-3000 hrs total time with exceptions given for time in type/time with company.

For example if you have 1500TT and 1000 in company aircraft vs 3000 hrs and 250 in company aircraft.

Beyond that, you need to meet all of the additional requirments of the ATP certificate.

DeadHead 04-11-2008 08:02 AM


Originally Posted by rickdb (Post 360904)
Also, I have been told that you can log SIC time as 1/2 PIC. Is this true?

Thanks.


Originally Posted by grossole (Post 360913)
For ATP PIC requirements, you may substitue 1/2 of your SIC time as PIC.

You cannot log SIC time as PIC time.

Stryker 04-11-2008 08:05 AM

no you cant log it, but you can substitute it for the ATP REQUIREMENTS.... So it makes you elligible if you dont meet he PIC requirements from the hard numbers in your logbook

Spooled 04-11-2008 08:11 AM


Originally Posted by grossole (Post 360913)
For ATP PIC requirements, you may substitue 1/2 of your SIC time as PIC.

I think you're getting that confused with the 1200hr ICAO requirement.

To issue an ATP you need 250hr PIC. However, some airlines have agreements with the FAA to do more OE for the people without 250 PIC.

rickair7777 04-11-2008 08:18 AM


Originally Posted by grossole (Post 360913)
For ATP PIC requirements, you may substitue 1/2 of your SIC time as PIC.

Not for a US ATP. You need 250 hours of real PIC, period.

For an ICAO ATP, you need 1200 hours PIC but you can SUBSTITUE two hours of 121 SIC for one hour of PIC (you still need some amount of real PIC). This means a low-timer will need 2500+ 121 SIC to qualify for ICAO ATP privileges.

The ICAO ATP is not required for domestic US flying, but most jet regionals go to canada and/or mexico so most require ICAO times to upgrade. Most turboprop-only operators should not require this.

andy171773 04-11-2008 08:25 AM

Comair requires 3000TT 1000ME and 500 hours with the company.

And obviously any other pertinent ATP requirements.

Like 23 years of age and of good moral character :)

MuseumDriver 04-11-2008 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 360953)
Not for a US ATP. You need 250 hours of real PIC, period.

For an ICAO ATP, you need 1200 hours PIC but you can SUBSTITUE two hours of 121 SIC for one hour of PIC (you still need some amount of real PIC). This means a low-timer will need 2500+ 121 SIC to qualify for ICAO ATP privileges.

The ICAO ATP is not required for domestic US flying, but most jet regionals go to canada and/or mexico so most require ICAO times to upgrade. Most turboprop-only operators should not require this.

An FAA ATP is an ICAO ATP... To my knowledge there is only one "FAA ATP" issued in the United States and it is accepted around the world as an ICAO ATP.

boilerpilot 04-11-2008 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 360953)
Not for a US ATP. You need 250 hours of real PIC, period.

For an ICAO ATP, you need 1200 hours PIC but you can SUBSTITUE two hours of 121 SIC for one hour of PIC (you still need some amount of real PIC). This means a low-timer will need 2500+ 121 SIC to qualify for ICAO ATP privileges.

The ICAO ATP is not required for domestic US flying, but most jet regionals go to canada and/or mexico so most require ICAO times to upgrade. Most turboprop-only operators should not require this.


Doesn't ANYbody read the regs anymore?


FAR 61.159.a.4

(4) 250 hours of flight time in an airplane as a pilot in command, or as second in command performing the duties of pilot in command while under the supervision of a pilot in command, or any combination thereof

boilerpilot 04-11-2008 08:54 AM


Originally Posted by MuseumDriver (Post 360986)
An FAA ATP is an ICAO ATP... To my knowledge there is only one "FAA ATP" and it is accepted around the world as an ICAO ATP.

Sort of, again, if you look at the regs, you'll notice that if you fail to meet the 1200 hour PIC mark, you will get a restriction on your ATP that says so.


FAR 61.159.d

(d) An applicant may be issued an airline transport pilot certificate with the endorsement, “Holder does not meet the pilot in command aeronautical experience requirements of ICAO,” as prescribed by Article 39 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, if the applicant:
(1) Credits second-in-command or flight-engineer time under paragraph (c) of this section toward the 1,500 hours total flight time requirement of paragraph (a) of this section;
(2) Does not have at least 1,200 hours of flight time as a pilot, including no more than 50 percent of his or her second-in-command time and none of his or her flight-engineer time; and
(3) Otherwise meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
(e) When the applicant specified in paragraph (d) of this section presents satisfactory evidence of the accumulation of 1,200 hours of flight time as a pilot including no more than 50 percent of his or her second-in-command flight time and none of his or her flight-engineer time, the applicant is entitled to an airline transport pilot certificate without the endorsement prescribed in that paragraph.

Spooled 04-11-2008 08:57 AM


Originally Posted by MuseumDriver (Post 360986)
An FAA ATP is an ICAO ATP... To my knowledge there is only one "FAA ATP" issued in the United States and it is accepted around the world as an ICAO ATP.

True, but, you would have the ICAO restriction: "Holder does not meet the pilot in command aeronautical experience requirement of ICAO" Which means you cannot exercise ATP privileges for international operations.

nicholasblonde 04-11-2008 09:04 AM

Thank god someone finally posted the reg. I hate it when people try to answer as if they know what they're talking about, when it takes less time to just go online and get the actual text of the regulation to post.

Utah 04-11-2008 09:33 AM

Beyond the ATP mins, SkyWest requires 2500tt, 1000 multi, 1000 turbine, and 1000 in a crew environment. They will not waive or reduce this, and it's one of the reasons EMB upgrade goes junior as alot don't meet the minimums.

Spooled 04-11-2008 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by nicholasblonde (Post 361012)
Thank god someone finally posted the reg. I hate it when people try to answer as if they know what they're talking about, when it takes less time to just go online and get the actual text of the regulation to post.

The regs are open to interpretation! I cannot find any legal interpretations on this subject.

Since you are at Pinnacle, you might find this information useful:
"Note: Minimum of 250 hours, PIC time, required for Pinnacle Airlines to issue ATP certificate."


Pinnacle doesn't count SIC acting as PIC, towards the 250 hours PIC time.

SharkAir 04-11-2008 10:38 AM

Is this really an issue? Who doesn't have 250 hours of legitimate PIC?

Spooled 04-11-2008 10:44 AM


Originally Posted by SharkAir (Post 361104)
Is this really an issue? Who doesn't have 250 hours of legitimate PIC?

People who get hired with less than 300TT. The infamous 280 Tom..

SharkAir 04-11-2008 10:48 AM

Have any of these guys actually upgraded yet?

RamenNoodles 04-11-2008 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by SharkAir (Post 361113)
Have any of these guys actually upgraded yet?

Yes. I know a few that were hired in the 1998 time frame that have been captains for years now. They simply carried the previously posted endorsement for about 18 months and were not allowed out of the country. Simple enough.

saab2000 04-11-2008 11:14 AM

When I upgraded at Air Wisconsin last summer, I had 128 hours of PIC in my logbook. There was some kind of limitation on my certificate at first, but was rapidly removed. Also, I could not fly to Canada at first.

Also, when I upgraded I had almost 4000 hours total time and about 3700 SIC. I now have about 560 hours of PIC.

SharkAir 04-11-2008 11:16 AM

Well that doesn't sound so bad. Plus, one would assume that with 4000 hours you'd be a competent pilot, PIC or not.

saab2000 04-11-2008 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by SharkAir (Post 361104)
Is this really an issue? Who doesn't have 250 hours of legitimate PIC?

I did not. I was part of a European Ab Initio program back in the 90s and was hired over there with 260 hours total time and just over 100 hours of PIC. It happens. Never instructed or flew cancelled checks or any of that usual stuff.

saab2000 04-11-2008 11:18 AM


Originally Posted by SharkAir (Post 361141)
Well that doesn't sound so bad. Plus, one would assume that with 4000 hours you'd be a competent pilot, PIC or not.

I am beyond competent! Superman comes to mind! :D

SharkAir 04-11-2008 11:31 AM


Originally Posted by saab2000 (Post 361143)
I did not. I was part of a European Ab Initio program back in the 90s and was hired over there with 260 hours total time and just over 100 hours of PIC. It happens. Never instructed or flew cancelled checks or any of that usual stuff.

Now don't get me started on Europe.

saab2000 04-11-2008 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by SharkAir (Post 361162)
Now don't get me started on Europe.

Why not? I lived there for about 15 years and think they basically do a pretty good job. Not better, not worse. Different. Different place with different needs. Getting my JAA certificates was NOT easy and the large airlines are extremely selective.

Anyway, not trying to pick an argument. I was just commenting on how it is possible to upgrade in the US with low PIC time, which I had. I still don't have very much.....

rickair7777 04-11-2008 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by boilerpilot (Post 360991)

Doesn't ANYbody read the regs anymore?


Quote:
FAR 61.159.a.4

(4) 250 hours of flight time in an airplane as a pilot in command, or as second in command performing the duties of pilot in command while under the supervision of a pilot in command, or any combination thereof

We are talking 121 airlines here. Unless your airline has a SPECIFIC policy which allows the SIC to "perform the duties of pilot in command while under the supervision of a pilot in command" you are not going to be able to use this clause.

Some airlines have programs to accomplish this, but if your company doesn't you can't just go declare yourself the "acting PIC".

rickair7777 04-11-2008 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by MuseumDriver (Post 360986)
An FAA ATP is an ICAO ATP... To my knowledge there is only one "FAA ATP" issued in the United States and it is accepted around the world as an ICAO ATP.

Only if you meet the ICAO requirements...otherwise your FAA ATP will have a restriction on it.

This is nothing new or obscure...every large jet regional in the US has this issue.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands